SWE-2 Flash
Explore SWE-2 Flash from Cognition: published specifications, source-linked vendor benchmarks, independent evaluator coverage and recorded pricing when available.
Compare SWE-2 Flash with other models →Compare subscription plansExplore data coverage
Pricing · OpenRouter
No OpenRouter pricing is recorded for this model. Missing rates are not free.
Official / vendor benchmarks
Default headline records. Own-vendor, peer-vendor and third-party provenance remain visible in evidence; configurations may differ.
| Benchmark / evaluator | Headline score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode 2.0 | 24%max effort | All 2 recorded results & sources23.2% · raw 23.17 % Alternative · low effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-04 Cognition primary public data.json (https://cognition.com/data/frontier-code-2.0/data.json), FrontierCode 2.0 main, 132 tasks; weighted new_score x100, not unweighted correct. Harness: devin. {"cost": 0.203}. Cost is source-observed mean USD per rollout at list API pricing, not an API rate. Data checked 5 November; evaluation date unpublished. Headline is the best-scoring published effort, as Cognition displays it. Cognition’s first 5 November copy of the file also listed a high-effort run (18.77, cost 0.2185); the current file has withdrawn it, so it is not stored. https://cognition.com/frontiercode24% · raw 24 % Headline · max effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-04 Cognition primary public data.json (https://cognition.com/data/frontier-code-2.0/data.json), FrontierCode 2.0 main, 132 tasks; weighted new_score x100, not unweighted correct. Harness: devin. {"cost": 0.2024}. Cost is source-observed mean USD per rollout at list API pricing, not an API rate. Data checked 5 November; evaluation date unpublished. Headline is the best-scoring published effort, as Cognition displays it. Cognition’s first 5 November copy of the file also listed a high-effort run (18.77, cost 0.2185); the current file has withdrawn it, so it is not stored. https://cognition.com/frontiercode |
| FrontierCode 1.1 Main | 45.5%unknown effort | The recorded result & source45.5% · raw 45.5 % Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-04 Cognition SWE-2 Flash launch table (4 November 2026), row “FrontierCode 1.1 Main”, column “SWE-2 Flash”. Cognition publishes no methodology for this table; its SWE-2 post says it reports a model’s public result where one exists and otherwise runs it in the harness it was developed for (Claude Code for Anthropic, Codex for OpenAI, Devin CLI for open-weight models) at its best reasoning effort. Effort per cell unstated. https://cognition.com/blog/swe-2-flash |
| DeepSWE v1.1 | 60.1%unknown effort | The recorded result & source60.1% · raw 60.1 % Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-04 Cognition SWE-2 Flash launch table (4 November 2026), row “DeepSWE 1.1”, column “SWE-2 Flash”. Cognition publishes no methodology for this table; its SWE-2 post says it reports a model’s public result where one exists and otherwise runs it in the harness it was developed for (Claude Code for Anthropic, Codex for OpenAI, Devin CLI for open-weight models) at its best reasoning effort. Effort per cell unstated. https://cognition.com/blog/swe-2-flash |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 20%unknown effort | The recorded result & source20% · raw 20 % Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-04 Cognition SWE-2 Flash launch table (4 November 2026), row “Terminal-Bench 4.0”, column “SWE-2 Flash”. Cognition publishes no methodology for this table; its SWE-2 post says it reports a model’s public result where one exists and otherwise runs it in the harness it was developed for (Claude Code for Anthropic, Codex for OpenAI, Devin CLI for open-weight models) at its best reasoning effort. Effort per cell unstated. https://cognition.com/blog/swe-2-flash |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 89.2%unknown effort | The recorded result & source89.2% · raw 89.2 % Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-04 Cognition SWE-2 Flash launch table (4 November 2026), row “Terminal-Bench 2.1”, column “SWE-2 Flash”. Cognition publishes no methodology for this table; its SWE-2 post says it reports a model’s public result where one exists and otherwise runs it in the harness it was developed for (Claude Code for Anthropic, Codex for OpenAI, Devin CLI for open-weight models) at its best reasoning effort. Effort per cell unstated. https://cognition.com/blog/swe-2-flash |
| SWE-Atlas QnA | 50%unknown effort | The recorded result & source50% · raw 50 % Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-04 Cognition SWE-2 Flash launch table (4 November 2026), row “SWE-Atlas QA”, column “SWE-2 Flash”. Cognition labels it “SWE-Atlas QA”. Cognition publishes no methodology for this table; its SWE-2 post says it reports a model’s public result where one exists and otherwise runs it in the harness it was developed for (Claude Code for Anthropic, Codex for OpenAI, Devin CLI for open-weight models) at its best reasoning effort. Effort per cell unstated. https://cognition.com/blog/swe-2-flash |
| SWE-bench Pro v2-Hard | 89.9%unknown effort | The recorded result & source89.9% · raw 89.9 % Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-04 Cognition SWE-2 Flash launch table (4 November 2026), row “SWE-Bench Pro v2 Hard”, column “SWE-2 Flash”. Cognition publishes no methodology for this table; its SWE-2 post says it reports a model’s public result where one exists and otherwise runs it in the harness it was developed for (Claude Code for Anthropic, Codex for OpenAI, Devin CLI for open-weight models) at its best reasoning effort. Effort per cell unstated. https://cognition.com/blog/swe-2-flash |
| ExploitBench | 34.8%unknown effort | The recorded result & source34.8% · raw 34.8 % Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-04 Cognition SWE-2 Flash launch table (4 November 2026), row “ExploitBench”, column “SWE-2 Flash”. Cognition publishes no methodology for this table; its SWE-2 post says it reports a model’s public result where one exists and otherwise runs it in the harness it was developed for (Claude Code for Anthropic, Codex for OpenAI, Devin CLI for open-weight models) at its best reasoning effort. Effort per cell unstated. https://cognition.com/blog/swe-2-flash |
Independent evaluators
Evaluator harnesses are distinct from vendor measurements. Missing coverage is not a failed test.
No independent evaluator results are recorded for this model.
Read how we select and source scores or the comparison guide.