Pareto 26.10 Benchmarks, Specifications & Availability

Pareto 26.10

Explore Pareto 26.10 from Unbiased: published specifications, source-linked vendor benchmarks, independent evaluator coverage and recorded pricing when available.

Latest versionPrevious version: Pareto 26.10 PreviewRelease source ↗

Published specifications

Provider: Unbiased
Access: Proprietary
License: Proprietary
Context window: 1.05M
Total parameters: Not published
Active parameters: Not published
Released: 2026-10-15
Modalities: text, image
Family: Pareto

Model card · Announcement · Website · OpenRouter

Model notes

Stable release of Unbiased’s hosted blended model. Unbiased says several frontier and open models work on every request and their outputs are blended into one answer, and that the composition can change. OpenRouter lists text and image input, text output, tool calling, a 1,048,576-token context and 131,072 output tokens. No official weights on Hugging Face (checked 2026-10-31). No results of its own yet: Unbiased says the 1 October figures on its model card are preview measurements, not a new evaluation of the stable release, so they stay on Pareto 26.10 Preview.

Compare Pareto 26.10 with other models →Compare subscription plans Explore data coverage

Pricing · OpenRouter

Dated cached OpenRouter rates in USD per 1M tokens. Open the dashboard for live enhancements. Per-metric endpoint minima can refer to different providers; they are not a guaranteed combined rate from one endpoint.

Recorded pricing tiers
Tier	Input / 1M	Output / 1M	Cached input / 1M	Cache write / 1M	Date & source
Default	$0.8	$3.2	$0.03	—	2026-10-31 · OpenRouter source

Recorded pricing notes

OpenRouter lists Unbiased as the single provider; no contributor sibling. min-healthy endpoint minima 2026-10-31

Official / vendor benchmarks

Default headline records. Own-vendor, peer-vendor and third-party provenance remain visible in evidence; configurations may differ.

No official results are recorded.

Independent evaluators

Evaluator harnesses are distinct from vendor measurements. Missing coverage is not a failed test.

No independent evaluator results are recorded for this model.

Read how we select and source scores or the comparison guide.