Examenos

Official vendor benches · independent evaluators · OpenRouter pricing

Model profilesv d6c93c5

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B-A12B (BF16)

Explore Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B-A12B (BF16) from NVIDIA: published specifications, source-linked vendor benchmarks, independent evaluator coverage and recorded pricing when available.

Compare Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B-A12B (BF16) with other models →Compare subscription plansExplore data coverage

Pricing · OpenRouter

No OpenRouter pricing is recorded for this model. Missing rates are not free.

Official / vendor benchmarks

Default headline records. Own-vendor, peer-vendor and third-party provenance remain visible in evidence; configurations may differ.

Official / vendor headline scores; expand evidence for every record
Benchmark / evaluatorHeadline scoreEvidence
SWE-bench Verified (OpenCode)71.1%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

71.1% · raw 71.1 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. OpenCode default agent harness; report Figure 8 unmodified-harness results have separate run settings. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23
SWE-bench Multilingual (NVIDIA OpenCode)67.7%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

67.7% · raw 67.72 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. OpenCode default agent harness; report Figure 8 unmodified-harness results have separate run settings. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23
SWE-bench Pro (NVIDIA OpenCode)51.8%unknown effort
All 7 recorded results & sources

51.8% · raw 51.78 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. OpenCode default agent harness; report Figure 8 unmodified-harness results have separate run settings. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23

49.5% · raw 49.45 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Harness: Claude Code 2.1.126. Unmodified harness system prompts and standard configurations. SWE-Pro 731 tasks / 2 repeats, no git history and explicit no-cheating/no-online-resources instruction; Terminal-Bench 2.1 89 tasks / 3 repeats. Distinct from the main NeMo Gym setup. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16/resolve/main/harness_comparisons.png

47.4% · raw 47.4 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Harness: Mini-SWE-agent 2.4.5. Unmodified harness system prompts and standard configurations. SWE-Pro 731 tasks / 2 repeats, no git history and explicit no-cheating/no-online-resources instruction; Terminal-Bench 2.1 89 tasks / 3 repeats. Distinct from the main NeMo Gym setup. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16/resolve/main/harness_comparisons.png

47.3% · raw 47.26 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Harness: Codex 0.144.6. Unmodified harness system prompts and standard configurations. SWE-Pro 731 tasks / 2 repeats, no git history and explicit no-cheating/no-online-resources instruction; Terminal-Bench 2.1 89 tasks / 3 repeats. Distinct from the main NeMo Gym setup. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16/resolve/main/harness_comparisons.png

47.2% · raw 47.2 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Harness: Hermes 0.18.2. Unmodified harness system prompts and standard configurations. SWE-Pro 731 tasks / 2 repeats, no git history and explicit no-cheating/no-online-resources instruction; Terminal-Bench 2.1 89 tasks / 3 repeats. Distinct from the main NeMo Gym setup. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16/resolve/main/harness_comparisons.png

46.9% · raw 46.92 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Harness: Pi 0.80.10. Unmodified harness system prompts and standard configurations. SWE-Pro 731 tasks / 2 repeats, no git history and explicit no-cheating/no-online-resources instruction; Terminal-Bench 2.1 89 tasks / 3 repeats. Distinct from the main NeMo Gym setup. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16/resolve/main/harness_comparisons.png

41% · raw 41.04 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Harness: OpenCode 1.17.8. Unmodified harness system prompts and standard configurations. SWE-Pro 731 tasks / 2 repeats, no git history and explicit no-cheating/no-online-resources instruction; Terminal-Bench 2.1 89 tasks / 3 repeats. Distinct from the main NeMo Gym setup. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16/resolve/main/harness_comparisons.png
τ²-bench (Retail)69.2%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

69.2% · raw 69.24 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23
τ²-bench (Airline)76.5%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

76.5% · raw 76.5 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23
τ²-bench (Telecom)73.2%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

73.2% · raw 73.19 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23
τ³-bench Banking18.9%unknown effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

18.9% · raw 18.88 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23

19.9% · raw 19.85 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Bolt report Table 7: explicit BF16 columns; all other metrics inherit Super parent evaluation setup. GDPVal is a published index, not Elo or percent; its mapping to Table 10 normalization is not asserted. MCP-Atlas uses the official evaluator on 500 public tasks with reasoning on, not the full 1,000-task suite. WebArena uses 812 public tasks, screenshot vision, vLLM temp 1.0/top_p 0.95, 100 steps, internal string/URL/programmatic checks. BrowseComp uses Exa. Super values differ from its main launch run and remain alternatives. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Bolt-74B-A9B-24GB-Technical-Report.pdf#page=16
Terminal-Bench 2.160.7%unknown effort
All 9 recorded results & sources

60.7% · raw 60.67 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Terminus 2, three-hour task timeout. Report Tables 10/23 and chart agree on 60.67 (~60.7); HF card table says 66.70, retained as an alternative rather than silently reconciled. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23

61.9% · raw 61.94 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Bolt report Table 7: explicit BF16 columns; all other metrics inherit Super parent evaluation setup. GDPVal is a published index, not Elo or percent; its mapping to Table 10 normalization is not asserted. MCP-Atlas uses the official evaluator on 500 public tasks with reasoning on, not the full 1,000-task suite. WebArena uses 812 public tasks, screenshot vision, vLLM temp 1.0/top_p 0.95, 100 steps, internal string/URL/programmatic checks. BrowseComp uses Exa. Super values differ from its main launch run and remain alternatives. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Bolt-74B-A9B-24GB-Technical-Report.pdf#page=16

66.7% · raw 66.7 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Exact released BF16 card table. Conflicts/rounding versus detailed report remain non-headline alternatives; detailed report supplies the precise protocol. Raw card label: Terminal-Bench 2.1. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16

61.8% · raw 61.8 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Harness: Codex 0.144.6. Unmodified harness system prompts and standard configurations. SWE-Pro 731 tasks / 2 repeats, no git history and explicit no-cheating/no-online-resources instruction; Terminal-Bench 2.1 89 tasks / 3 repeats. Distinct from the main NeMo Gym setup. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16/resolve/main/harness_comparisons.png

61.4% · raw 61.42 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Harness: Hermes 0.18.2. Unmodified harness system prompts and standard configurations. SWE-Pro 731 tasks / 2 repeats, no git history and explicit no-cheating/no-online-resources instruction; Terminal-Bench 2.1 89 tasks / 3 repeats. Distinct from the main NeMo Gym setup. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16/resolve/main/harness_comparisons.png

59.6% · raw 59.55 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Harness: Claude Code 2.1.126. Unmodified harness system prompts and standard configurations. SWE-Pro 731 tasks / 2 repeats, no git history and explicit no-cheating/no-online-resources instruction; Terminal-Bench 2.1 89 tasks / 3 repeats. Distinct from the main NeMo Gym setup. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16/resolve/main/harness_comparisons.png

55.1% · raw 55.06 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Harness: OpenCode 1.17.8. Unmodified harness system prompts and standard configurations. SWE-Pro 731 tasks / 2 repeats, no git history and explicit no-cheating/no-online-resources instruction; Terminal-Bench 2.1 89 tasks / 3 repeats. Distinct from the main NeMo Gym setup. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16/resolve/main/harness_comparisons.png

54.7% · raw 54.68 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Harness: Mini-SWE-agent 2.4.5. Unmodified harness system prompts and standard configurations. SWE-Pro 731 tasks / 2 repeats, no git history and explicit no-cheating/no-online-resources instruction; Terminal-Bench 2.1 89 tasks / 3 repeats. Distinct from the main NeMo Gym setup. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16/resolve/main/harness_comparisons.png

48.3% · raw 48.31 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Harness: Pi 0.80.10. Unmodified harness system prompts and standard configurations. SWE-Pro 731 tasks / 2 repeats, no git history and explicit no-cheating/no-online-resources instruction; Terminal-Bench 2.1 89 tasks / 3 repeats. Distinct from the main NeMo Gym setup. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16/resolve/main/harness_comparisons.png
GDPval-AA v2 (NVIDIA committee Elo)1211.2unknown effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

1211.2 · raw 1211.2 Elo

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Stirrup agent, NVIDIA reference committee loosely following AA v2.1; not independent AA Elo. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23

1211 · raw 1211 Elo

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Exact released BF16 card table. Conflicts/rounding versus detailed report remain non-headline alternatives; detailed report supplies the precise protocol. Raw card label: GDPval-AA v2. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16
GDPval-AA v2 (NVIDIA normalized Elo)35.6%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

35.6% · raw 35.6 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Stirrup agent, NVIDIA reference committee loosely following AA v2.1; not independent AA Elo. Raw source 0.356/0.532 normalized values ×100; not a pass rate. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23
BrowseComp (NVIDIA Exa/NeMo Gym)78.9%unknown effort
All 3 recorded results & sources

78.9% · raw 78.91 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23

71.5% · raw 71.5 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Bolt report Table 7: explicit BF16 columns; all other metrics inherit Super parent evaluation setup. GDPVal is a published index, not Elo or percent; its mapping to Table 10 normalization is not asserted. MCP-Atlas uses the official evaluator on 500 public tasks with reasoning on, not the full 1,000-task suite. WebArena uses 812 public tasks, screenshot vision, vLLM temp 1.0/top_p 0.95, 100 steps, internal string/URL/programmatic checks. BrowseComp uses Exa. Super values differ from its main launch run and remain alternatives. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Bolt-74B-A9B-24GB-Technical-Report.pdf#page=16

78% · raw 78 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Exact released BF16 card table. Conflicts/rounding versus detailed report remain non-headline alternatives; detailed report supplies the precise protocol. Raw card label: BrowseComp. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16
BrowseComp (NVIDIA OpenCode)72.4%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

72.4% · raw 72.35 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23
SciCode (subtask)47.1%unknown effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

47.1% · raw 47.13 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23

47.3% · raw 47.27 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Bolt report Table 7: explicit BF16 columns; all other metrics inherit Super parent evaluation setup. GDPVal is a published index, not Elo or percent; its mapping to Table 10 normalization is not asserted. MCP-Atlas uses the official evaluator on 500 public tasks with reasoning on, not the full 1,000-task suite. WebArena uses 812 public tasks, screenshot vision, vLLM temp 1.0/top_p 0.95, 100 steps, internal string/URL/programmatic checks. BrowseComp uses Exa. Super values differ from its main launch run and remain alternatives. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Bolt-74B-A9B-24GB-Technical-Report.pdf#page=16
SciCode (whole problem)15.1%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

15.1% · raw 15.1 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23
LiveCodeBench v688.2%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

88.2% · raw 88.22 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23
GPQA Diamond89.5%unknown effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

89.5% · raw 89.52 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23

90.8% · raw 90.78 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Bolt report Table 7: explicit BF16 columns; all other metrics inherit Super parent evaluation setup. GDPVal is a published index, not Elo or percent; its mapping to Table 10 normalization is not asserted. MCP-Atlas uses the official evaluator on 500 public tasks with reasoning on, not the full 1,000-task suite. WebArena uses 812 public tasks, screenshot vision, vLLM temp 1.0/top_p 0.95, 100 steps, internal string/URL/programmatic checks. BrowseComp uses Exa. Super values differ from its main launch run and remain alternatives. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Bolt-74B-A9B-24GB-Technical-Report.pdf#page=16
CritPt10.9%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

10.9% · raw 10.86 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23
Humanity's Last Exam (text-only, no tools)31.8%unknown effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

31.8% · raw 31.79 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23

31.8% · raw 31.84 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Bolt report Table 7: explicit BF16 columns; all other metrics inherit Super parent evaluation setup. GDPVal is a published index, not Elo or percent; its mapping to Table 10 normalization is not asserted. MCP-Atlas uses the official evaluator on 500 public tasks with reasoning on, not the full 1,000-task suite. WebArena uses 812 public tasks, screenshot vision, vLLM temp 1.0/top_p 0.95, 100 steps, internal string/URL/programmatic checks. BrowseComp uses Exa. Super values differ from its main launch run and remain alternatives. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Bolt-74B-A9B-24GB-Technical-Report.pdf#page=16
Humanity's Last Exam (text-only, with tools)46%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

46% · raw 46.01 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23
MathArena APEX Shortlist (NVIDIA, no tools)88.4%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

88.4% · raw 88.36 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23
AA-Omniscience Accuracy (public set)26.2%unknown effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

26.2% · raw 26.2 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23

26% · raw 25.98 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Bolt report Table 7: explicit BF16 columns; all other metrics inherit Super parent evaluation setup. GDPVal is a published index, not Elo or percent; its mapping to Table 10 normalization is not asserted. MCP-Atlas uses the official evaluator on 500 public tasks with reasoning on, not the full 1,000-task suite. WebArena uses 812 public tasks, screenshot vision, vLLM temp 1.0/top_p 0.95, 100 steps, internal string/URL/programmatic checks. BrowseComp uses Exa. Super values differ from its main launch run and remain alternatives. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Bolt-74B-A9B-24GB-Technical-Report.pdf#page=16
AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination Rate (1 − Hallucination Rate, public set)70%unknown effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

70% · raw 69.96 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23

69.2% · raw 69.24 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Bolt report Table 7: explicit BF16 columns; all other metrics inherit Super parent evaluation setup. GDPVal is a published index, not Elo or percent; its mapping to Table 10 normalization is not asserted. MCP-Atlas uses the official evaluator on 500 public tasks with reasoning on, not the full 1,000-task suite. WebArena uses 812 public tasks, screenshot vision, vLLM temp 1.0/top_p 0.95, 100 steps, internal string/URL/programmatic checks. BrowseComp uses Exa. Super values differ from its main launch run and remain alternatives. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Bolt-74B-A9B-24GB-Technical-Report.pdf#page=16
BabyVision29.6%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

29.6% · raw 29.6 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23
CharXiv (RQ split)80.8%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

80.8% · raw 80.82 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23
MathVision78.2%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

78.2% · raw 78.16 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23
OCR-Reasoning65.1%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

65.1% · raw 65.08 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23
OCRBench v2 (English)68.1%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

68.1% · raw 68.12 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23
OCRBench v2 (Chinese)59.2%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

59.2% · raw 59.15 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23
Video-MME v2 (without subtitles)32.9%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

32.9% · raw 32.85 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23
V* (static multiple choice, no search)85.6%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

85.6% · raw 85.6 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23
HLE (full 2,500 questions, NVIDIA)29.2%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

29.2% · raw 29.2 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23
MMLongBench-Doc (up to 100 pages, NVIDIA)62.8%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

62.8% · raw 62.82 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23
OSWorld-Verified (NVIDIA 361 tasks, partial credit)52.1%unknown effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

52.1% · raw 52.14 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23

51.1% · raw 51.14 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Exact released BF16 card table. Conflicts/rounding versus detailed report remain non-headline alternatives; detailed report supplies the precise protocol. Raw card label: OSWorld-Verified. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16
AA-LCR v1.168.6%unknown effort
All 3 recorded results & sources

68.6% · raw 68.63 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23

68.8% · raw 68.81 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Bolt report Table 7: explicit BF16 columns; all other metrics inherit Super parent evaluation setup. GDPVal is a published index, not Elo or percent; its mapping to Table 10 normalization is not asserted. MCP-Atlas uses the official evaluator on 500 public tasks with reasoning on, not the full 1,000-task suite. WebArena uses 812 public tasks, screenshot vision, vLLM temp 1.0/top_p 0.95, 100 steps, internal string/URL/programmatic checks. BrowseComp uses Exa. Super values differ from its main launch run and remain alternatives. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Bolt-74B-A9B-24GB-Technical-Report.pdf#page=16

68.6% · raw 68.62 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Exact released BF16 card table. Conflicts/rounding versus detailed report remain non-headline alternatives; detailed report supplies the precise protocol. Raw card label: AA-LCR v1.1. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16
GraphWalks (BFS + parents, 950 prompts ≤1M)89.7%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

89.7% · raw 89.71 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23
IFBench (NVIDIA strict constraint fraction)70.9%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

70.9% · raw 70.86 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23
NV Chat Benchmark (NVIDIA style-controlled win rate)52.7%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

52.7% · raw 52.67 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23
MMLU-ProX (NVIDIA 10-language mean)76.9%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

76.9% · raw 76.91 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23
WMT24++ XCOMET-XXL (EN → nine languages)84.8 scoreunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

84.8 score · raw 84.8 score

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=23
GDPval-AA v2 (NVIDIA reported index)34.5unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

34.5 · raw 34.48 index

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Bolt report Table 7: explicit BF16 columns; all other metrics inherit Super parent evaluation setup. GDPVal is a published index, not Elo or percent; its mapping to Table 10 normalization is not asserted. MCP-Atlas uses the official evaluator on 500 public tasks with reasoning on, not the full 1,000-task suite. WebArena uses 812 public tasks, screenshot vision, vLLM temp 1.0/top_p 0.95, 100 steps, internal string/URL/programmatic checks. BrowseComp uses Exa. Super values differ from its main launch run and remain alternatives. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Bolt-74B-A9B-24GB-Technical-Report.pdf#page=16
PinchBench90.3%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

90.3% · raw 90.25 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Bolt report Table 7: explicit BF16 columns; all other metrics inherit Super parent evaluation setup. GDPVal is a published index, not Elo or percent; its mapping to Table 10 normalization is not asserted. MCP-Atlas uses the official evaluator on 500 public tasks with reasoning on, not the full 1,000-task suite. WebArena uses 812 public tasks, screenshot vision, vLLM temp 1.0/top_p 0.95, 100 steps, internal string/URL/programmatic checks. BrowseComp uses Exa. Super values differ from its main launch run and remain alternatives. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Bolt-74B-A9B-24GB-Technical-Report.pdf#page=16
MCP-Atlas (NVIDIA public 500 tasks)51.2%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

51.2% · raw 51.2 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Bolt report Table 7: explicit BF16 columns; all other metrics inherit Super parent evaluation setup. GDPVal is a published index, not Elo or percent; its mapping to Table 10 normalization is not asserted. MCP-Atlas uses the official evaluator on 500 public tasks with reasoning on, not the full 1,000-task suite. WebArena uses 812 public tasks, screenshot vision, vLLM temp 1.0/top_p 0.95, 100 steps, internal string/URL/programmatic checks. BrowseComp uses Exa. Super values differ from its main launch run and remain alternatives. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Bolt-74B-A9B-24GB-Technical-Report.pdf#page=16
WebArena (NVIDIA vision, public 812 tasks)57.4%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

57.4% · raw 57.4 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Bolt report Table 7: explicit BF16 columns; all other metrics inherit Super parent evaluation setup. GDPVal is a published index, not Elo or percent; its mapping to Table 10 normalization is not asserted. MCP-Atlas uses the official evaluator on 500 public tasks with reasoning on, not the full 1,000-task suite. WebArena uses 812 public tasks, screenshot vision, vLLM temp 1.0/top_p 0.95, 100 steps, internal string/URL/programmatic checks. BrowseComp uses Exa. Super values differ from its main launch run and remain alternatives. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Bolt-74B-A9B-24GB-Technical-Report.pdf#page=16
IFBench (loose instruction)73%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

73% · raw 73.04 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Bolt report Table 7: explicit BF16 columns; all other metrics inherit Super parent evaluation setup. GDPVal is a published index, not Elo or percent; its mapping to Table 10 normalization is not asserted. MCP-Atlas uses the official evaluator on 500 public tasks with reasoning on, not the full 1,000-task suite. WebArena uses 812 public tasks, screenshot vision, vLLM temp 1.0/top_p 0.95, 100 steps, internal string/URL/programmatic checks. BrowseComp uses Exa. Super values differ from its main launch run and remain alternatives. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Bolt-74B-A9B-24GB-Technical-Report.pdf#page=16
AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate (public set)30%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

30% · raw 30 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Exact released BF16 card table. Conflicts/rounding versus detailed report remain non-headline alternatives; detailed report supplies the precise protocol. Raw card label: AA-Omniscience hallucination rate. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16
AA-Omniscience Index (public set)4unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

4 · raw 4.03 index

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Exact released BF16 card table. Conflicts/rounding versus detailed report remain non-headline alternatives; detailed report supplies the precise protocol. Raw card label: AA-Omniscience index. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16
BrowseComp (NVIDIA offline)78%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

78% · raw 78 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Exact card offline snapshot; full source text: 78. Tuple labels and parentheses are not explained; no quantity/denominator inferred. Reported external AA values are quotes, not independent verification. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16
WebVoyager (NVIDIA offline)77.7%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

77.7% · raw 77.72 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Exact card offline snapshot; full source text: 77.72. Tuple labels and parentheses are not explained; no quantity/denominator inferred. Reported external AA values are quotes, not independent verification. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16
AA-Briefcase-Lite (NVIDIA offline, component 1)1137 scoreunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

1137 score · raw 1137 score

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Exact card offline snapshot; full source text: 1137 (-) | 1252 (-) | 40. Tuple labels and parentheses are not explained; no quantity/denominator inferred. Reported external AA values are quotes, not independent verification. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16
AA-Briefcase-Lite (NVIDIA offline, component 2)1252 scoreunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

1252 score · raw 1252 score

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Exact card offline snapshot; full source text: 1137 (-) | 1252 (-) | 40. Tuple labels and parentheses are not explained; no quantity/denominator inferred. Reported external AA values are quotes, not independent verification. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16
AA-Briefcase-Lite (NVIDIA offline, component 3)40 scoreunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

40 score · raw 40 score

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Exact card offline snapshot; full source text: 1137 (-) | 1252 (-) | 40. Tuple labels and parentheses are not explained; no quantity/denominator inferred. Reported external AA values are quotes, not independent verification. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16
AutomationBench-AA (NVIDIA offline)32.4%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

32.4% · raw 32.44 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Exact card offline snapshot; full source text: 32.44. Tuple labels and parentheses are not explained; no quantity/denominator inferred. Reported external AA values are quotes, not independent verification. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16
GDP.pdf (NVIDIA offline)6.6%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

6.6% · raw 6.6 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Exact card offline snapshot; full source text: 6.6 (AA 6.6). Tuple labels and parentheses are not explained; no quantity/denominator inferred. Reported external AA values are quotes, not independent verification. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16
Terminal Bench 4 (NVIDIA offline)1%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

1% · raw 1 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Exact card offline snapshot; full source text: 1. Tuple labels and parentheses are not explained; no quantity/denominator inferred. Reported external AA values are quotes, not independent verification. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16
DeepSWE (NVIDIA offline)24.7%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

24.7% · raw 24.65 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Exact card offline snapshot; full source text: 24.65. Tuple labels and parentheses are not explained; no quantity/denominator inferred. Reported external AA values are quotes, not independent verification. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16
SWE-bench Verified (OpenCode) — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)22353 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

22353 tokens/trajectory · raw 22353 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
SWE-bench Multilingual (NVIDIA OpenCode) — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)29710 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

29710 tokens/trajectory · raw 29710 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
SWE-bench Pro (NVIDIA OpenCode) — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)25630 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

25630 tokens/trajectory · raw 25630 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
τ²-bench (Telecom) — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)5784 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

5784 tokens/trajectory · raw 5784 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
τ²-bench (Retail) — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)4028 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

4028 tokens/trajectory · raw 4028 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
τ²-bench (Airline) — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)5426 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

5426 tokens/trajectory · raw 5426 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
τ³-bench Banking — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)12173 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

12173 tokens/trajectory · raw 12173 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
Terminal-Bench 2.1 — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)65560 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

65560 tokens/trajectory · raw 65560 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
Nvidia Gdpval Accuracy50%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

50% · raw 49.98 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Final BF16 reference, Table 23. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
Nvidia Gdpval Accuracy — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)49705 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

49705 tokens/trajectory · raw 49705 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
SciCode (subtask) — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)6621 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

6621 tokens/trajectory · raw 6621 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
SciCode (whole problem) — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)6621 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

6621 tokens/trajectory · raw 6621 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
LiveCodeBench v6 — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)15449 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

15449 tokens/trajectory · raw 15449 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
Bird Text2Sql No Tools59.6%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

59.6% · raw 59.58 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Final BF16 reference, Table 23. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
Bird Text2Sql No Tools — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)637 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

637 tokens/trajectory · raw 637 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
GPQA Diamond — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)14383 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

14383 tokens/trajectory · raw 14383 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
MathArena APEX Shortlist (NVIDIA, no tools) — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)68050 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

68050 tokens/trajectory · raw 68050 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
Humanity's Last Exam (text-only, no tools) — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)39253 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

39253 tokens/trajectory · raw 39253 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
AA-Omniscience Accuracy (public set) — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)4373 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

4373 tokens/trajectory · raw 4373 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination Rate (1 − Hallucination Rate, public set) — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)4373 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

4373 tokens/trajectory · raw 4373 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
CritPt — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)7347 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

7347 tokens/trajectory · raw 7347 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
BabyVision — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)11839 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

11839 tokens/trajectory · raw 11839 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
CharXiv (RQ split) — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)4157 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

4157 tokens/trajectory · raw 4157 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
MathVision — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)7434 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

7434 tokens/trajectory · raw 7434 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
OCR-Reasoning — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)5362 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

5362 tokens/trajectory · raw 5362 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
OCRBench v2 (English) — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)1860 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

1860 tokens/trajectory · raw 1860 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
OCRBench v2 (Chinese) — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)2688 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

2688 tokens/trajectory · raw 2688 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
ScreenSpot-Pro43.5%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

43.5% · raw 43.53 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Final BF16 reference, Table 23. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
ScreenSpot-Pro — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)236 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

236 tokens/trajectory · raw 236 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
Video-MME v2 (without subtitles) — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)4579 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

4579 tokens/trajectory · raw 4579 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
V* (static multiple choice, no search) — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)855 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

855 tokens/trajectory · raw 855 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
HLE (full 2,500 questions, NVIDIA) — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)36564 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

36564 tokens/trajectory · raw 36564 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
MMLongBench-Doc (up to 100 pages, NVIDIA) — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)3365 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

3365 tokens/trajectory · raw 3365 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
AA-LCR v1.1 — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)4601 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

4601 tokens/trajectory · raw 4601 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
GraphWalks (BFS + parents, 950 prompts ≤1M) — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)10635 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

10635 tokens/trajectory · raw 10635 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
IFBench (NVIDIA strict constraint fraction) — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)10016 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

10016 tokens/trajectory · raw 10016 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
NV Chat Benchmark (NVIDIA style-controlled win rate) — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)3835 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

3835 tokens/trajectory · raw 3835 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
MMLU-ProX (NVIDIA 10-language mean) — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)3478 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

3478 tokens/trajectory · raw 3478 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
Wmt24Pp En Xx52.3%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

52.3% · raw 52.32 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Final BF16 reference, Table 23. NeMo Gym; report Table 10 and §§3.8–3.9. AA Omniscience uses 600 public questions / 10 repeats with GPT-5.6 Luna judge. SciCode uses scientist background / 8 repeats and distinguishes subtask vs whole-problem accuracy. GPQA averages 8 repeats; APEX Shortlist 16 repeats, no tools. HLE text-only has 2,158 questions; full HLE 2,500 with one sample. Video-MME v2 has no subtitles; V* has no search tool. OSWorld excludes Google Drive tasks (361), screenshot-only pyautogui, 100 steps and partial-credit mean over 3 runs. GraphWalks averages F1 across BFS and parents on the same 950/1,150 prompts fitting ≤1M. IFBench is mean fraction of constraints satisfied under strict verification, not prompt all-pass. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
Wmt24Pp En Xx — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)1175 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

1175 tokens/trajectory · raw 1175 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
WMT24++ XCOMET-XXL (EN → nine languages) — output tokens/trajectory (NVIDIA BF16)1175 tokens/trajectoryunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

1175 tokens/trajectory · raw 1175 tokens/trajectory

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Mean BF16 completion tokens per trajectory from Table 23; exact benchmark and harness defined by the corresponding accuracy observation. No cash cost is inferred. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=43
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (NVIDIA LAV study, 89 tasks)62.7%unknown effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

62.7% · raw 62.7 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Figure 9 final post-trained checkpoint; empirical pass@1 averaged across candidate rollouts; 5 candidate trajectories, 89 tasks. Same model verifies candidates using three criteria, both presentation orders and probabilistic pivot tournament. BrowseComp uses only a 400-problem tracking subset. Baseline is headline; selected result is an explicit alternative. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=29

71.9% · raw 71.9 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Figure 9 final post-trained checkpoint; LAV selected accuracy; 5 candidate trajectories, 89 tasks. Same model verifies candidates using three criteria, both presentation orders and probabilistic pivot tournament. BrowseComp uses only a 400-problem tracking subset. Baseline is headline; selected result is an explicit alternative. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=29
SWE Verified (NVIDIA LAV study, 500 tasks)71.3%unknown effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

71.3% · raw 71.3 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Figure 9 final post-trained checkpoint; empirical pass@1 averaged across candidate rollouts; 3 candidate trajectories, 500 tasks. Same model verifies candidates using three criteria, both presentation orders and probabilistic pivot tournament. BrowseComp uses only a 400-problem tracking subset. Baseline is headline; selected result is an explicit alternative. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=29

72.4% · raw 72.4 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Figure 9 final post-trained checkpoint; LAV selected accuracy; 3 candidate trajectories, 500 tasks. Same model verifies candidates using three criteria, both presentation orders and probabilistic pivot tournament. BrowseComp uses only a 400-problem tracking subset. Baseline is headline; selected result is an explicit alternative. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=29
SWE Pro (NVIDIA LAV study, 731 tasks)52.2%unknown effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

52.2% · raw 52.2 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Figure 9 final post-trained checkpoint; empirical pass@1 averaged across candidate rollouts; 3 candidate trajectories, 731 tasks. Same model verifies candidates using three criteria, both presentation orders and probabilistic pivot tournament. BrowseComp uses only a 400-problem tracking subset. Baseline is headline; selected result is an explicit alternative. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=29

54.6% · raw 54.6 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Figure 9 final post-trained checkpoint; LAV selected accuracy; 3 candidate trajectories, 731 tasks. Same model verifies candidates using three criteria, both presentation orders and probabilistic pivot tournament. BrowseComp uses only a 400-problem tracking subset. Baseline is headline; selected result is an explicit alternative. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=29
SWE Multilingual (NVIDIA LAV study, 300 tasks)69.8%unknown effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

69.8% · raw 69.8 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Figure 9 final post-trained checkpoint; empirical pass@1 averaged across candidate rollouts; 3 candidate trajectories, 300 tasks. Same model verifies candidates using three criteria, both presentation orders and probabilistic pivot tournament. BrowseComp uses only a 400-problem tracking subset. Baseline is headline; selected result is an explicit alternative. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=29

71.7% · raw 71.7 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Figure 9 final post-trained checkpoint; LAV selected accuracy; 3 candidate trajectories, 300 tasks. Same model verifies candidates using three criteria, both presentation orders and probabilistic pivot tournament. BrowseComp uses only a 400-problem tracking subset. Baseline is headline; selected result is an explicit alternative. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=29
DeepSWE (NVIDIA LAV study, 113 tasks)24.6%unknown effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

24.6% · raw 24.6 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Figure 9 final post-trained checkpoint; empirical pass@1 averaged across candidate rollouts; 5 candidate trajectories, 113 tasks. Same model verifies candidates using three criteria, both presentation orders and probabilistic pivot tournament. BrowseComp uses only a 400-problem tracking subset. Baseline is headline; selected result is an explicit alternative. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=29

34.5% · raw 34.5 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Figure 9 final post-trained checkpoint; LAV selected accuracy; 5 candidate trajectories, 113 tasks. Same model verifies candidates using three criteria, both presentation orders and probabilistic pivot tournament. BrowseComp uses only a 400-problem tracking subset. Baseline is headline; selected result is an explicit alternative. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=29
BrowseComp (NVIDIA LAV study, 400 tasks)71.5%unknown effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

71.5% · raw 71.5 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Figure 9 final post-trained checkpoint; empirical pass@1 averaged across candidate rollouts; 3 candidate trajectories, 400 tasks. Same model verifies candidates using three criteria, both presentation orders and probabilistic pivot tournament. BrowseComp uses only a 400-problem tracking subset. Baseline is headline; selected result is an explicit alternative. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=29

79.8% · raw 79.8 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Figure 9 final post-trained checkpoint; LAV selected accuracy; 3 candidate trajectories, 400 tasks. Same model verifies candidates using three criteria, both presentation orders and probabilistic pivot tournament. BrowseComp uses only a 400-problem tracking subset. Baseline is headline; selected result is an explicit alternative. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=29
SPEED-Bench MTP acceptance length: Coding (boosted Super)5.6 tokensunknown effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

5.6 tokens · raw 5.563 tokens

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Table 9 Boosted MTP, SPEED-Bench qualitative split, draft length 7, reasoning on, temperature 0 greedy decoding. Native/pre-boosting checkpoint and unlabeled Figure 6 coordinates excluded. Greedy configuration is headline. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=22

5.4 tokens · raw 5.441 tokens

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Table 9 Boosted MTP, SPEED-Bench qualitative split, draft length 7, reasoning on, temperature 1 probabilistic draft sampling. Native/pre-boosting checkpoint and unlabeled Figure 6 coordinates excluded. Greedy configuration is headline. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=22
SPEED-Bench MTP acceptance length: Humanities (boosted Super)4 tokensunknown effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

4 tokens · raw 3.975 tokens

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Table 9 Boosted MTP, SPEED-Bench qualitative split, draft length 7, reasoning on, temperature 0 greedy decoding. Native/pre-boosting checkpoint and unlabeled Figure 6 coordinates excluded. Greedy configuration is headline. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=22

3.8 tokens · raw 3.817 tokens

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Table 9 Boosted MTP, SPEED-Bench qualitative split, draft length 7, reasoning on, temperature 1 probabilistic draft sampling. Native/pre-boosting checkpoint and unlabeled Figure 6 coordinates excluded. Greedy configuration is headline. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=22
SPEED-Bench MTP acceptance length: Math (boosted Super)4.8 tokensunknown effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

4.8 tokens · raw 4.841 tokens

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Table 9 Boosted MTP, SPEED-Bench qualitative split, draft length 7, reasoning on, temperature 0 greedy decoding. Native/pre-boosting checkpoint and unlabeled Figure 6 coordinates excluded. Greedy configuration is headline. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=22

4.8 tokens · raw 4.825 tokens

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Table 9 Boosted MTP, SPEED-Bench qualitative split, draft length 7, reasoning on, temperature 1 probabilistic draft sampling. Native/pre-boosting checkpoint and unlabeled Figure 6 coordinates excluded. Greedy configuration is headline. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=22
SPEED-Bench MTP acceptance length: Multilingual (boosted Super)5.5 tokensunknown effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

5.5 tokens · raw 5.548 tokens

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Table 9 Boosted MTP, SPEED-Bench qualitative split, draft length 7, reasoning on, temperature 0 greedy decoding. Native/pre-boosting checkpoint and unlabeled Figure 6 coordinates excluded. Greedy configuration is headline. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=22

5.4 tokens · raw 5.358 tokens

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Table 9 Boosted MTP, SPEED-Bench qualitative split, draft length 7, reasoning on, temperature 1 probabilistic draft sampling. Native/pre-boosting checkpoint and unlabeled Figure 6 coordinates excluded. Greedy configuration is headline. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=22
SPEED-Bench MTP acceptance length: QA (boosted Super)4.5 tokensunknown effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

4.5 tokens · raw 4.526 tokens

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Table 9 Boosted MTP, SPEED-Bench qualitative split, draft length 7, reasoning on, temperature 0 greedy decoding. Native/pre-boosting checkpoint and unlabeled Figure 6 coordinates excluded. Greedy configuration is headline. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=22

4.4 tokens · raw 4.378 tokens

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Table 9 Boosted MTP, SPEED-Bench qualitative split, draft length 7, reasoning on, temperature 1 probabilistic draft sampling. Native/pre-boosting checkpoint and unlabeled Figure 6 coordinates excluded. Greedy configuration is headline. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=22
SPEED-Bench MTP acceptance length: RAG (boosted Super)5.5 tokensunknown effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

5.5 tokens · raw 5.538 tokens

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Table 9 Boosted MTP, SPEED-Bench qualitative split, draft length 7, reasoning on, temperature 0 greedy decoding. Native/pre-boosting checkpoint and unlabeled Figure 6 coordinates excluded. Greedy configuration is headline. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=22

5.5 tokens · raw 5.496 tokens

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Table 9 Boosted MTP, SPEED-Bench qualitative split, draft length 7, reasoning on, temperature 1 probabilistic draft sampling. Native/pre-boosting checkpoint and unlabeled Figure 6 coordinates excluded. Greedy configuration is headline. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=22
SPEED-Bench MTP acceptance length: Reasoning (boosted Super)4.8 tokensunknown effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

4.8 tokens · raw 4.791 tokens

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Table 9 Boosted MTP, SPEED-Bench qualitative split, draft length 7, reasoning on, temperature 0 greedy decoding. Native/pre-boosting checkpoint and unlabeled Figure 6 coordinates excluded. Greedy configuration is headline. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=22

4.8 tokens · raw 4.751 tokens

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Table 9 Boosted MTP, SPEED-Bench qualitative split, draft length 7, reasoning on, temperature 1 probabilistic draft sampling. Native/pre-boosting checkpoint and unlabeled Figure 6 coordinates excluded. Greedy configuration is headline. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=22
SPEED-Bench MTP acceptance length: Roleplay (boosted Super)3.8 tokensunknown effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

3.8 tokens · raw 3.781 tokens

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Table 9 Boosted MTP, SPEED-Bench qualitative split, draft length 7, reasoning on, temperature 0 greedy decoding. Native/pre-boosting checkpoint and unlabeled Figure 6 coordinates excluded. Greedy configuration is headline. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=22

3.7 tokens · raw 3.703 tokens

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Table 9 Boosted MTP, SPEED-Bench qualitative split, draft length 7, reasoning on, temperature 1 probabilistic draft sampling. Native/pre-boosting checkpoint and unlabeled Figure 6 coordinates excluded. Greedy configuration is headline. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=22
SPEED-Bench MTP acceptance length: STEM (boosted Super)4.1 tokensunknown effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

4.1 tokens · raw 4.102 tokens

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Table 9 Boosted MTP, SPEED-Bench qualitative split, draft length 7, reasoning on, temperature 0 greedy decoding. Native/pre-boosting checkpoint and unlabeled Figure 6 coordinates excluded. Greedy configuration is headline. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=22

4 tokens · raw 4.045 tokens

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Table 9 Boosted MTP, SPEED-Bench qualitative split, draft length 7, reasoning on, temperature 1 probabilistic draft sampling. Native/pre-boosting checkpoint and unlabeled Figure 6 coordinates excluded. Greedy configuration is headline. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=22
SPEED-Bench MTP acceptance length: Summarization (boosted Super)5.2 tokensunknown effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

5.2 tokens · raw 5.235 tokens

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Table 9 Boosted MTP, SPEED-Bench qualitative split, draft length 7, reasoning on, temperature 0 greedy decoding. Native/pre-boosting checkpoint and unlabeled Figure 6 coordinates excluded. Greedy configuration is headline. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=22

5 tokens · raw 5.041 tokens

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Table 9 Boosted MTP, SPEED-Bench qualitative split, draft length 7, reasoning on, temperature 1 probabilistic draft sampling. Native/pre-boosting checkpoint and unlabeled Figure 6 coordinates excluded. Greedy configuration is headline. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=22
SPEED-Bench MTP acceptance length: Writing (boosted Super)4 tokensunknown effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

4 tokens · raw 4.001 tokens

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Table 9 Boosted MTP, SPEED-Bench qualitative split, draft length 7, reasoning on, temperature 0 greedy decoding. Native/pre-boosting checkpoint and unlabeled Figure 6 coordinates excluded. Greedy configuration is headline. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=22

3.9 tokens · raw 3.873 tokens

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Table 9 Boosted MTP, SPEED-Bench qualitative split, draft length 7, reasoning on, temperature 1 probabilistic draft sampling. Native/pre-boosting checkpoint and unlabeled Figure 6 coordinates excluded. Greedy configuration is headline. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=22
SPEED-Bench MTP acceptance length: Average (boosted Super)4.7 tokensunknown effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

4.7 tokens · raw 4.718 tokens

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Table 9 Boosted MTP, SPEED-Bench qualitative split, draft length 7, reasoning on, temperature 0 greedy decoding. Native/pre-boosting checkpoint and unlabeled Figure 6 coordinates excluded. Greedy configuration is headline. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=22

4.6 tokens · raw 4.612 tokens

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Table 9 Boosted MTP, SPEED-Bench qualitative split, draft length 7, reasoning on, temperature 1 probabilistic draft sampling. Native/pre-boosting checkpoint and unlabeled Figure 6 coordinates excluded. Greedy configuration is headline. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated. Alternative source/configuration; does not replace the existing headline.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=22
NVIDIA H100 BF16 aggregate throughput522 tok/sunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

522 tok/s · raw 522 tok/s

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Figure 10 BF16 bars; vLLM, 50K shared prefix, 20 turns of 2,048 input / 1,024 output tokens, ReplaySSM disabled. Aggregate throughput is output tokens/s/GPU subject to ≥50 tokens/s/user; minimum-latency point reports tokens/s/user, not latency seconds. Not OpenRouter API speed. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=44
NVIDIA H100 BF16 minimum latency decode rate509.1 tok/sunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

509.1 tok/s · raw 509.131 tok/s

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Figure 10 BF16 bars; vLLM, 50K shared prefix, 20 turns of 2,048 input / 1,024 output tokens, ReplaySSM disabled. Aggregate throughput is output tokens/s/GPU subject to ≥50 tokens/s/user; minimum-latency point reports tokens/s/user, not latency seconds. Not OpenRouter API speed. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=44
NVIDIA GB200 BF16 aggregate throughput1778 tok/sunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

1778 tok/s · raw 1778 tok/s

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Figure 10 BF16 bars; vLLM, 50K shared prefix, 20 turns of 2,048 input / 1,024 output tokens, ReplaySSM disabled. Aggregate throughput is output tokens/s/GPU subject to ≥50 tokens/s/user; minimum-latency point reports tokens/s/user, not latency seconds. Not OpenRouter API speed. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=44
NVIDIA GB200 BF16 minimum latency decode rate587.5 tok/sunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

587.5 tok/s · raw 587.453 tok/s

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Harness: NVIDIA evaluation of the released BF16 post-trained model. Figure 10 BF16 bars; vLLM, 50K shared prefix, 20 turns of 2,048 input / 1,024 output tokens, ReplaySSM disabled. Aggregate throughput is output tokens/s/GPU subject to ≥50 tokens/s/user; minimum-latency point reports tokens/s/user, not latency seconds. Not OpenRouter API speed. Checked 15 October 2026; execution date and selectable model effort unpublished unless explicitly stated.

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-and-Lightning-Technical-Report.pdf#page=44

Independent evaluators

Evaluator harnesses are distinct from vendor measurements. Missing coverage is not a failed test.

Independent evaluator headline scores; expand evidence for every record
Benchmark / evaluatorHeadline scoreEvidence
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Acronyms · Artificial Analysis3.84 acronyms/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

3.84 acronyms/response · raw 3.84 acronyms/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Acronyms: Two or more capital letters in a row (AI, USA) or dotted forms (U.S.). Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 3.84.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Avg. sentence length · Artificial Analysis14.60 words/sentenceunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

14.60 words/sentence · raw 14.6 words/sentence

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Avg. sentence length: Words divided by sentences. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 14.6.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Bold text · Artificial Analysis14.90 bold spans/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

14.90 bold spans/response · raw 14.9 bold spans/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Bold text: Uses of bold: each unbroken run of bold text counts once, so a single bolded word and a fully bolded sentence both count as 1. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 14.9.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Characters · Artificial Analysis4158 characters/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

4158 characters/response · raw 4158 characters/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Characters: Characters in the prose, spaces included, after code and URLs are removed. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 4,158.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Colons · Artificial Analysis10.40 colons/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

10.40 colons/response · raw 10.4 colons/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Colons: Colons. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 10.4.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Contractions · Artificial Analysis9.94 contractions/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

9.94 contractions/response · raw 9.94 contractions/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Contractions: Contractions such as “don’t”, “you’re” and “it’s”; possessives such as “John’s” do not count. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 9.94.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Ellipses · Artificial Analysis0.15 ellipses/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

0.15 ellipses/response · raw 0.15 ellipses/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Ellipses: Three periods (...) or the ellipsis character (…). Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 0.15.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Em dashes · Artificial Analysis3.41 em dashes/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

3.41 em dashes/response · raw 3.41 em dashes/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Em dashes: The em dash character (—); double hyphens do not count. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 3.41.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Emojis · Artificial Analysis0.02 emojis/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

0.02 emojis/response · raw 0.02 emojis/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Emojis: Each emoji as the reader sees it. An emoji built from several characters, such as a family (👨‍👩‍👧), still counts as one emoji. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 0.02.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Ends with a question · Artificial Analysis2%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

2% · raw 2 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Ends with a question: Whether the answer’s last character is a question mark, reported as the share of responses that do. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 2%.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Exclamations · Artificial Analysis0.07 exclamations/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

0.07 exclamations/response · raw 0.07 exclamations/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Exclamations: Exclamation marks. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 0.07.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Headings · Artificial Analysis5.81 headings/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

5.81 headings/response · raw 5.81 headings/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Headings: Headings of any level. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 5.81.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Italics · Artificial Analysis2.39 italic spans/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

2.39 italic spans/response · raw 2.39 italic spans/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Italics: Uses of italics: each unbroken run of italic text counts once, so a single italicized word and a fully italicized sentence both count as 1. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 2.39.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Lists · Artificial Analysis3.78 lists/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

3.78 lists/response · raw 3.78 lists/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Lists: Top-level bulleted or numbered lists; nested sub-lists do not count separately. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 3.78.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Paragraphs · Artificial Analysis11.60 paragraphs/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

11.60 paragraphs/response · raw 11.6 paragraphs/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Paragraphs: Paragraphs of prose; headings, code and the items of a single-spaced list do not count. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 11.6.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Parentheses · Artificial Analysis7.56 parenthesis pairs/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

7.56 parenthesis pairs/response · raw 7.56 parenthesis pairs/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Parentheses: Closed pairs of parentheses, nested pairs included; unmatched parentheses do not count. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 7.56.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Questions · Artificial Analysis3.14 question marks/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

3.14 question marks/response · raw 3.14 question marks/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Questions: Question marks. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 3.14.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Quotes · Artificial Analysis13.50 quotation marks/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

13.50 quotation marks/response · raw 13.5 quotation marks/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Quotes: Quotation marks of any style, such as straight, curly, « » and „ “; apostrophes do not count. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 13.5.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Sentences · Artificial Analysis45.70 sentences/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

45.70 sentences/response · raw 45.7 sentences/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Sentences: Sentences found by a rule-based splitter that handles abbreviations such as “Dr.”. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 45.7.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Tables · Artificial Analysis0.41 tables/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

0.41 tables/response · raw 0.41 tables/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Tables: Tables. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 0.41.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Words · Artificial Analysis634 words/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

634 words/response · raw 634 words/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Words: Tokens that contain a letter or digit; each Chinese, Japanese or Korean character counts as one word (but all questions are in English). Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 634.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Index · Conviction percentile · Artificial Analysis24 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

24 percentile · raw 24 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Direct, confident positions and constructive pushback. Source index is the mean of member-trait Elo z-scores followed by percentile ranking across the October2026 evaluated pool. Sycophantic is inverted only when contributing to Transparency; this does not invert the separately reported Sycophantic trait. A higher number means more of this named communication pattern, not better model quality. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 24.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Index · Expressiveness percentile · Artificial Analysis62 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

62 percentile · raw 62 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Rich, varied, well-crafted language. Source index is the mean of member-trait Elo z-scores followed by percentile ranking across the October2026 evaluated pool. Sycophantic is inverted only when contributing to Transparency; this does not invert the separately reported Sycophantic trait. A higher number means more of this named communication pattern, not better model quality. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 62.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Index · Imagination percentile · Artificial Analysis48 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

48 percentile · raw 48 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Creative, exploratory, open-ended thinking. Source index is the mean of member-trait Elo z-scores followed by percentile ranking across the October2026 evaluated pool. Sycophantic is inverted only when contributing to Transparency; this does not invert the separately reported Sycophantic trait. A higher number means more of this named communication pattern, not better model quality. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 48.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Index · Informativeness percentile · Artificial Analysis59 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

59 percentile · raw 59 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Practical depth, evidence, actionable content. Source index is the mean of member-trait Elo z-scores followed by percentile ranking across the October2026 evaluated pool. Sycophantic is inverted only when contributing to Transparency; this does not invert the separately reported Sycophantic trait. A higher number means more of this named communication pattern, not better model quality. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 59.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Index · Organization percentile · Artificial Analysis97 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

97 percentile · raw 97 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Well-structured, scannable, answer-first. Source index is the mean of member-trait Elo z-scores followed by percentile ranking across the October2026 evaluated pool. Sycophantic is inverted only when contributing to Transparency; this does not invert the separately reported Sycophantic trait. A higher number means more of this named communication pattern, not better model quality. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 97.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Index · Slop percentile · Artificial Analysis63 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

63 percentile · raw 63 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Use of filler and generic language. Source index is the mean of member-trait Elo z-scores followed by percentile ranking across the October2026 evaluated pool. Sycophantic is inverted only when contributing to Transparency; this does not invert the separately reported Sycophantic trait. A higher number means more of this named communication pattern, not better model quality. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 63.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Index · Transparency percentile · Artificial Analysis53 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

53 percentile · raw 53 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Truthful, acknowledges uncertainty, non-sycophantic. Source index is the mean of member-trait Elo z-scores followed by percentile ranking across the October2026 evaluated pool. Sycophantic is inverted only when contributing to Transparency; this does not invert the separately reported Sycophantic trait. A higher number means more of this named communication pattern, not better model quality. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 53.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Index · Warmth percentile · Artificial Analysis36 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

36 percentile · raw 36 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Friendly, humorous, sincere, emotionally attuned. Source index is the mean of member-trait Elo z-scores followed by percentile ranking across the October2026 evaluated pool. Sycophantic is inverted only when contributing to Transparency; this does not invert the separately reported Sycophantic trait. A higher number means more of this named communication pattern, not better model quality. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 36.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Trait · Actionable Guidance percentile · Artificial Analysis66 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

66 percentile · raw 66 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Prominence of the Actionable Guidance writing trait, judged pairwise among responses to the same questions. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 66.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Trait · Admits Uncertainty percentile · Artificial Analysis52 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

52 percentile · raw 52 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Prominence of the Admits Uncertainty writing trait, judged pairwise among responses to the same questions. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 52.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Trait · Answer First percentile · Artificial Analysis43 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

43 percentile · raw 43 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Prominence of the Answer First writing trait, judged pairwise among responses to the same questions. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 43.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Trait · Bottom-Line Summary percentile · Artificial Analysis89 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

89 percentile · raw 89 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Prominence of the Bottom-Line Summary writing trait, judged pairwise among responses to the same questions. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 89.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Trait · Confident percentile · Artificial Analysis58 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

58 percentile · raw 58 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Prominence of the Confident writing trait, judged pairwise among responses to the same questions. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 58.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Trait · Constructive Pushback percentile · Artificial Analysis49 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

49 percentile · raw 49 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Prominence of the Constructive Pushback writing trait, judged pairwise among responses to the same questions. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 49.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Trait · Creative percentile · Artificial Analysis46 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

46 percentile · raw 46 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Prominence of the Creative writing trait, judged pairwise among responses to the same questions. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 46.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Trait · Direct percentile · Artificial Analysis29 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

29 percentile · raw 29 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Prominence of the Direct writing trait, judged pairwise among responses to the same questions. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 29.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Trait · Disclaims Assumptions percentile · Artificial Analysis49 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

49 percentile · raw 49 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Prominence of the Disclaims Assumptions writing trait, judged pairwise among responses to the same questions. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 49.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Trait · Eloquent percentile · Artificial Analysis72 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

72 percentile · raw 72 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Prominence of the Eloquent writing trait, judged pairwise among responses to the same questions. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 72.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Trait · Emotionally Intelligent percentile · Artificial Analysis26 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

26 percentile · raw 26 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Prominence of the Emotionally Intelligent writing trait, judged pairwise among responses to the same questions. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 26.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Trait · Evidence-Based percentile · Artificial Analysis26 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

26 percentile · raw 26 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Prominence of the Evidence-Based writing trait, judged pairwise among responses to the same questions. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 26.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Trait · Flags Nuances percentile · Artificial Analysis55 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

55 percentile · raw 55 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Prominence of the Flags Nuances writing trait, judged pairwise among responses to the same questions. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 55.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Trait · Friendly percentile · Artificial Analysis46 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

46 percentile · raw 46 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Prominence of the Friendly writing trait, judged pairwise among responses to the same questions. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 46.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Trait · Humorous percentile · Artificial Analysis55 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

55 percentile · raw 55 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Prominence of the Humorous writing trait, judged pairwise among responses to the same questions. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 55.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Trait · Information Dense percentile · Artificial Analysis46 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

46 percentile · raw 46 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Prominence of the Information Dense writing trait, judged pairwise among responses to the same questions. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 46.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Trait · Lexically Varied percentile · Artificial Analysis55 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

55 percentile · raw 55 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Prominence of the Lexically Varied writing trait, judged pairwise among responses to the same questions. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 55.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Trait · Literate percentile · Artificial Analysis72 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

72 percentile · raw 72 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Prominence of the Literate writing trait, judged pairwise among responses to the same questions. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 72.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Trait · Metaphorical percentile · Artificial Analysis69 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

69 percentile · raw 69 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Prominence of the Metaphorical writing trait, judged pairwise among responses to the same questions. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 69.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Trait · Natural Sounding percentile · Artificial Analysis35 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

35 percentile · raw 35 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Prominence of the Natural Sounding writing trait, judged pairwise among responses to the same questions. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 35.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Trait · Open-Ended percentile · Artificial Analysis38 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

38 percentile · raw 38 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Prominence of the Open-Ended writing trait, judged pairwise among responses to the same questions. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 38.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Trait · Opinionated percentile · Artificial Analysis15 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

15 percentile · raw 15 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Prominence of the Opinionated writing trait, judged pairwise among responses to the same questions. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 15.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Trait · Pragmatic percentile · Artificial Analysis38 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

38 percentile · raw 38 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Prominence of the Pragmatic writing trait, judged pairwise among responses to the same questions. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 38.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Trait · Resource-Specific percentile · Artificial Analysis66 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

66 percentile · raw 66 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Prominence of the Resource-Specific writing trait, judged pairwise among responses to the same questions. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 66.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Trait · Scannable percentile · Artificial Analysis94 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

94 percentile · raw 94 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Prominence of the Scannable writing trait, judged pairwise among responses to the same questions. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 94.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Trait · Sincere percentile · Artificial Analysis38 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

38 percentile · raw 38 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Prominence of the Sincere writing trait, judged pairwise among responses to the same questions. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 38.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Trait · Slop percentile · Artificial Analysis63 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

63 percentile · raw 63 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Prominence of the Slop writing trait, judged pairwise among responses to the same questions. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 63.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Trait · Structured percentile · Artificial Analysis92 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

92 percentile · raw 92 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Prominence of the Structured writing trait, judged pairwise among responses to the same questions. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 92.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Trait · Sycophantic percentile · Artificial Analysis41 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

41 percentile · raw 41 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Prominence of the Sycophantic writing trait, judged pairwise among responses to the same questions. Native trait direction: higher means more sycophancy; only its contribution to Transparency is inverted. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 41.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Trait · Truthful percentile · Artificial Analysis43 percentileunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

43 percentile · raw 43 percentile

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Prominence of the Truthful writing trait, judged pairwise among responses to the same questions. A judged writing/personality trait in this question population, not a general factual-accuracy benchmark. Blind pairwise LLM judging by Gemini3.8Flash(high), ClaudeSonnet5.5(medium), GLM5.3Flash(max), one randomly assigned judge per comparison with balanced assignments and randomized answer order; reasoning text hidden. Firth-penalized Bradley–Terry trait ratings; ties count as half-win. GPT-6.1Sol(max) anchors Elo1000. Published values here are rounded 1–100 pool-relative percentiles, NOT Elo, raw accuracy or a percentage of tasks passed. The current capture contains 36 judged configurations even though UI selection labels say38of38; the two extra communication-only models have no captured judged values. Underlying Elo and 95%CI values were not captured, and are not inferred from chart widths/colors; methodology uses1000bootstrap refits. The pool-relative scale can move when the evaluated pool changes without a new model execution. Source label: 43.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
GDPval-AA v2.1 Elo · Artificial Analysis1162unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

1162 · raw 1162 Elo

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Manually observed public GDPval-AA v2.1 leaderboard table, full 298-configuration pool checked 20 October 2026. Exact source configuration: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL; creator: NVIDIA; source rank 127; source release-month label Oct 2026 is model release metadata, not execution date. Published rounded native Elo 1162; literal displayed CI -19 / +19. Native Elo is not a percentage and is not the normalized (Elo−500)/2000 chart quantity. This versioned metric is separate from older generic GDPval-AA Elo and vendor GDPval/GDPval-AA results; no old evidence is overwritten. Execution date, inference precision, unprinted effort budgets and task costs are unpublished in this captured table. Elo is relative to the dated comparison pool; drift from an earlier observation does not prove a new evaluation run. Source does not label an effort; unknown is preserved rather than copying a vendor default. AA exact model-page links to the approved reference checkpoint were verified in prior curated evidence; a BF16 reference link does not prove BF16 inference. Headline: highest published native Elo for this exact approved model; tied values prefer existing featured effort then source order.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/gdpval-aa
Intelligence Index · Artificial Analysis26.5unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

26.5 · raw 26.4910658661689 index

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Artificial Analysis independent evaluation; page explicitly links the requested BF16 weights repository. Inference provider/weight precision and exact run date are not disclosed; this is not a claim that AA served BF16. Reasoning enabled but selectable effort is unspecified; the metadata reasoningTokens field is not treated as a verified inference budget.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/nemotron-3-5-super-vl
AA-Omniscience Index · Artificial Analysis-4.2unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

-4.2 · raw -4.216666666666667 index

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Artificial Analysis independent evaluation; page explicitly links the requested BF16 weights repository. Inference provider/weight precision and exact run date are not disclosed; this is not a claim that AA served BF16. Reasoning enabled but selectable effort is unspecified; the metadata reasoningTokens field is not treated as a verified inference budget.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/nemotron-3-5-super-vl
AA-Omniscience accuracy · Artificial Analysis23.3%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

23.3% · raw 23.283333333333335 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Artificial Analysis independent evaluation; page explicitly links the requested BF16 weights repository. Inference provider/weight precision and exact run date are not disclosed; this is not a claim that AA served BF16. Reasoning enabled but selectable effort is unspecified; the metadata reasoningTokens field is not treated as a verified inference budget. Published fraction on 0–1 scale ×100.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/nemotron-3-5-super-vl
AA-Omniscience hallucination rate · Artificial Analysis35.8%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

35.8% · raw 35.84618726917228 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Artificial Analysis independent evaluation; page explicitly links the requested BF16 weights repository. Inference provider/weight precision and exact run date are not disclosed; this is not a claim that AA served BF16. Reasoning enabled but selectable effort is unspecified; the metadata reasoningTokens field is not treated as a verified inference budget. Published fraction on 0–1 scale ×100.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/nemotron-3-5-super-vl
GDPval-AA Elo · Artificial Analysis1162.4unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

1162.4 · raw 1162.41 Elo

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Artificial Analysis independent evaluation; page explicitly links the requested BF16 weights repository. Inference provider/weight precision and exact run date are not disclosed; this is not a claim that AA served BF16. Reasoning enabled but selectable effort is unspecified; the metadata reasoningTokens field is not treated as a verified inference budget.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/nemotron-3-5-super-vl
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) · Artificial Analysis0%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

0% · raw 0 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Artificial Analysis independent evaluation; page explicitly links the requested BF16 weights repository. Inference provider/weight precision and exact run date are not disclosed; this is not a claim that AA served BF16. Reasoning enabled but selectable effort is unspecified; the metadata reasoningTokens field is not treated as a verified inference budget. Published fraction on 0–1 scale ×100.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/nemotron-3-5-super-vl
SciCode (AA) · Artificial Analysis47.8%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

47.8% · raw 47.8009259259259 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Artificial Analysis independent evaluation; page explicitly links the requested BF16 weights repository. Inference provider/weight precision and exact run date are not disclosed; this is not a claim that AA served BF16. Reasoning enabled but selectable effort is unspecified; the metadata reasoningTokens field is not treated as a verified inference budget. Published fraction on 0–1 scale ×100.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/nemotron-3-5-super-vl
AA-LCR · Artificial Analysis69%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

69% · raw 69 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Artificial Analysis independent evaluation; page explicitly links the requested BF16 weights repository. Inference provider/weight precision and exact run date are not disclosed; this is not a claim that AA served BF16. Reasoning enabled but selectable effort is unspecified; the metadata reasoningTokens field is not treated as a verified inference budget. Published fraction on 0–1 scale ×100.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/nemotron-3-5-super-vl
Humanity's Last Exam (AA harness) · Artificial Analysis30.7%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

30.7% · raw 30.722891566265098 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Artificial Analysis independent evaluation; page explicitly links the requested BF16 weights repository. Inference provider/weight precision and exact run date are not disclosed; this is not a claim that AA served BF16. Reasoning enabled but selectable effort is unspecified; the metadata reasoningTokens field is not treated as a verified inference budget. Published fraction on 0–1 scale ×100.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/nemotron-3-5-super-vl
CritPt (AA) · Artificial Analysis10.6%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

10.6% · raw 10.5714285714286 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Artificial Analysis independent evaluation; page explicitly links the requested BF16 weights repository. Inference provider/weight precision and exact run date are not disclosed; this is not a claim that AA served BF16. Reasoning enabled but selectable effort is unspecified; the metadata reasoningTokens field is not treated as a verified inference budget. Published fraction on 0–1 scale ×100.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/nemotron-3-5-super-vl
GDP.PDF (AA) · Artificial Analysis8%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

8% · raw 8 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Artificial Analysis independent evaluation; page explicitly links the requested BF16 weights repository. Inference provider/weight precision and exact run date are not disclosed; this is not a claim that AA served BF16. Reasoning enabled but selectable effort is unspecified; the metadata reasoningTokens field is not treated as a verified inference budget. Published fraction on 0–1 scale ×100.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/nemotron-3-5-super-vl
AutomationBench (AA) · Artificial Analysis14.8%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

14.8% · raw 14.818345798643588 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Artificial Analysis independent evaluation; page explicitly links the requested BF16 weights repository. Inference provider/weight precision and exact run date are not disclosed; this is not a claim that AA served BF16. Reasoning enabled but selectable effort is unspecified; the metadata reasoningTokens field is not treated as a verified inference budget. Published fraction on 0–1 scale ×100. Partial reward, not strict all-assertion pass rate.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/nemotron-3-5-super-vl
AA Industry Index · Finance and accounting · Artificial Analysis27.2unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

27.2 · raw 27.1898695604114 index

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Artificial Analysis independent evaluation; page explicitly links the requested BF16 weights repository. Inference provider/weight precision and exact run date are not disclosed; this is not a claim that AA served BF16. Reasoning enabled but selectable effort is unspecified; the metadata reasoningTokens field is not treated as a verified inference budget.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/nemotron-3-5-super-vl
AA Industry Index · Strategy and operations · Artificial Analysis22.6unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

22.6 · raw 22.5653667608007 index

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Artificial Analysis independent evaluation; page explicitly links the requested BF16 weights repository. Inference provider/weight precision and exact run date are not disclosed; this is not a claim that AA served BF16. Reasoning enabled but selectable effort is unspecified; the metadata reasoningTokens field is not treated as a verified inference budget.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/nemotron-3-5-super-vl
AA Industry Index · Legal · Artificial Analysis28.1unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

28.1 · raw 28.1134112990134 index

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Artificial Analysis independent evaluation; page explicitly links the requested BF16 weights repository. Inference provider/weight precision and exact run date are not disclosed; this is not a claim that AA served BF16. Reasoning enabled but selectable effort is unspecified; the metadata reasoningTokens field is not treated as a verified inference budget.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/nemotron-3-5-super-vl
AA Industry Index · Engineering · Artificial Analysis30.1unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

30.1 · raw 30.1143480206541 index

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Artificial Analysis independent evaluation; page explicitly links the requested BF16 weights repository. Inference provider/weight precision and exact run date are not disclosed; this is not a claim that AA served BF16. Reasoning enabled but selectable effort is unspecified; the metadata reasoningTokens field is not treated as a verified inference budget.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/nemotron-3-5-super-vl
AA Industry Index · Economics · Artificial Analysis38.5unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

38.5 · raw 38.4726370481928 index

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Artificial Analysis independent evaluation; page explicitly links the requested BF16 weights repository. Inference provider/weight precision and exact run date are not disclosed; this is not a claim that AA served BF16. Reasoning enabled but selectable effort is unspecified; the metadata reasoningTokens field is not treated as a verified inference budget.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/nemotron-3-5-super-vl
AA-Briefcase Elo · Artificial Analysis998.8unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

998.8 · raw 998.76 Elo

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Artificial Analysis independent evaluation; page explicitly links the requested BF16 weights repository. Inference provider/weight precision and exact run date are not disclosed; this is not a claim that AA served BF16. Reasoning enabled but selectable effort is unspecified; the metadata reasoningTokens field is not treated as a verified inference budget. 95% CI 989.23 to 1008.29.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/nemotron-3-5-super-vl
AA-Briefcase analytical quality Elo · Artificial Analysis996.7unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

996.7 · raw 996.67 Elo

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Artificial Analysis independent evaluation; page explicitly links the requested BF16 weights repository. Inference provider/weight precision and exact run date are not disclosed; this is not a claim that AA served BF16. Reasoning enabled but selectable effort is unspecified; the metadata reasoningTokens field is not treated as a verified inference budget. 95% CI 979.1 to 1014.24.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/nemotron-3-5-super-vl
AA-Briefcase presentation Elo · Artificial Analysis997.8unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

997.8 · raw 997.76 Elo

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Artificial Analysis independent evaluation; page explicitly links the requested BF16 weights repository. Inference provider/weight precision and exact run date are not disclosed; this is not a claim that AA served BF16. Reasoning enabled but selectable effort is unspecified; the metadata reasoningTokens field is not treated as a verified inference budget. 95% CI 980.29 to 1015.22.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/nemotron-3-5-super-vl
AA-Briefcase rubric pass rate · Artificial Analysis26.9%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

26.9% · raw 26.86868686868687 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-15

Artificial Analysis independent evaluation; page explicitly links the requested BF16 weights repository. Inference provider/weight precision and exact run date are not disclosed; this is not a claim that AA served BF16. Reasoning enabled but selectable effort is unspecified; the metadata reasoningTokens field is not treated as a verified inference budget. Published fraction on 0–1 scale ×100.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/nemotron-3-5-super-vl

Read how we select and source scores or the comparison guide.