Examenos

Official vendor benches · independent evaluators · OpenRouter pricing

Model profilesv d6c93c5

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Explore MiniMax M3.1 Flash from MiniMax: published specifications, source-linked vendor benchmarks, independent evaluator coverage and recorded pricing when available.

Compare MiniMax M3.1 Flash with other models →Compare subscription plansExplore data coverage

Pricing · OpenRouter

Dated cached OpenRouter rates in USD per 1M tokens. Open the dashboard for live enhancements. Per-metric endpoint minima can refer to different providers; they are not a guaranteed combined rate from one endpoint.

Recorded pricing tiers
TierInput / 1MOutput / 1MCached input / 1MCache write / 1MDate & source
Default$0$0——2026-10-20 · OpenRouter source
Recorded pricing notes

Healthy public Minimax free endpoint; status 0 and 100% 30m uptime at source check. Genuine zero input/output rates, not assumed zero for missing data. Cache read/write tariffs and keyless speed are not published. This router offer is separate from MiniMax direct API $0.15/$0.60/$0.015 per million input/output/cache-read tokens. Endpoint label explicitly identifies the 20261019 release.; min-healthy endpoint minima 2026-10-20

Official / vendor benchmarks

Default headline records. Own-vendor, peer-vendor and third-party provenance remain visible in evidence; configurations may differ.

Official / vendor headline scores; expand evidence for every record
Benchmark / evaluatorHeadline scoreEvidence
AutomationBench v1.0.662.2%unknown effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

62.2% · raw 62.2 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: 600 publicly released AutomationBench tasks; benchmark version 1.0.6, main-table harness and effort unspecified. Not the Claude Code effort sweep. Own vendor launch figure. Main figure contains no per-model effort labels. Execution date, exact checkpoint SHA, generation budget and sampling settings are unpublished. Source checked 2026-10-19.

https://filecdn.minimax.chat/public/m31-flash-en-2-1792403273121.png

62% · raw 62 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: launch-tweet rounded summary; not a distinct evaluation. The detailed launch table remains headline. Effort/configuration is not restated in this summary.

https://x.com/minimax_ai/status/2112150867868541221
BankerToolBench (OpenCode, MiniMax M2.7 judge)76.2%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

76.2% · raw 76.2 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: OpenCode 1.17.18; MiniMax-M2.7 judge. Own vendor launch figure. Main figure contains no per-model effort labels. Execution date, exact checkpoint SHA, generation budget and sampling settings are unpublished. Source checked 2026-10-19.

https://filecdn.minimax.chat/public/m31-flash-en-2-1792403273121.png
GDP.PDF (vendor reports)20.8%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

20.8% · raw 20.8 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: Vendor explicitly attributes this figure to Artificial Analysis. It remains a vendor-cited observation; the exact new model was not found in the checked AA catalog. Own vendor launch figure. Main figure contains no per-model effort labels. Execution date, exact checkpoint SHA, generation budget and sampling settings are unpublished. Source checked 2026-10-19.

https://filecdn.minimax.chat/public/m31-flash-en-2-1792403273121.png
Terminal-Bench 4.038.1%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

38.1% · raw 38.1 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: Codex 0.149.1. Own vendor launch figure. Main figure contains no per-model effort labels. Execution date, exact checkpoint SHA, generation budget and sampling settings are unpublished. Source checked 2026-10-19.

https://filecdn.minimax.chat/public/m31-flash-en-2-1792403273121.png
LOCA-Bench 256K60.3%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

60.3% · raw 60.3 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: Official LOCA implementation at 256K. Own vendor launch figure. Main figure contains no per-model effort labels. Execution date, exact checkpoint SHA, generation budget and sampling settings are unpublished. Source checked 2026-10-19.

https://filecdn.minimax.chat/public/m31-flash-en-2-1792403273121.png
Agents' Last Exam29.6%unknown effort
All 3 recorded results & sources

29.6% · raw 29.6 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: Official ALE Overall full 152-task population, not ALE-CLI or an unlicensed subset. Vendor quotes the public board; direct board results are recorded independently. Own vendor launch figure. Main figure contains no per-model effort labels. Execution date, exact checkpoint SHA, generation budget and sampling settings are unpublished. Source checked 2026-10-19.

https://filecdn.minimax.chat/public/m31-flash-en-2-1792403273121.png

29.6% · raw 29.6 %

Alternative · max effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: Claude Code, max. ALE-v1 Overall 152-task full population. Explicit vendor label; independent public source confirms rounded pass rate. Chart cost estimate is a different metric; board costs are withheld. Source public-model-data date 18 October, evaluation date unknown.

https://filecdn.minimax.chat/public/m31-flash-en-3-1792403273121.png

30% · raw 30 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: launch-tweet rounded summary; not a distinct evaluation. The detailed launch table remains headline. Effort/configuration is not restated in this summary.

https://x.com/minimax_ai/status/2112150867868541221
OSWorld 2.061.7%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

61.7% · raw 61.7 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: Official 0808 full release; source says highest release-time report for peers except the DeepSeek V4.1 in-house reproduction. Reward type and exact action budget unspecified. Own vendor launch figure. Main figure contains no per-model effort labels. Execution date, exact checkpoint SHA, generation budget and sampling settings are unpublished. Source checked 2026-10-19.

https://filecdn.minimax.chat/public/m31-flash-en-2-1792403273121.png
PostTrainBench v1.139.3 scoreunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

39.3 score · raw 39.3 score

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: Claude Code 2.1.251; maximum context 512K; PostTrainBench v1.1, not v1.2. Own vendor launch figure. Main figure contains no per-model effort labels. Execution date, exact checkpoint SHA, generation budget and sampling settings are unpublished. Source checked 2026-10-19.

https://filecdn.minimax.chat/public/m31-flash-en-2-1792403273121.png
DeepSWE v1.173.7%unknown effort
All 5 recorded results & sources

73.7% · raw 73.7 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: mini-swe-agent 2.4.5; maximum context 512K. Own vendor launch figure. Main figure contains no per-model effort labels. Execution date, exact checkpoint SHA, generation budget and sampling settings are unpublished. Source checked 2026-10-19.

https://filecdn.minimax.chat/public/m31-flash-en-2-1792403273121.png

73.7% · raw 73.7 %

Alternative · max effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: mini-swe-agent, explicit labeled effort sweep. Main table states version 2.4.5 and 512K context; chart does not restate those settings. Retain table headline separately. The footnote says public data as of 22 September despite some later-named peers; this does not establish run dates. Only explicit numeric labels are imported, never unlabeled peer scores or dollar coordinates.

https://filecdn.minimax.chat/public/m31-flash-en-4-1792403273121.png

72.1% · raw 72.1 %

Alternative · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: mini-swe-agent, explicit labeled effort sweep. Main table states version 2.4.5 and 512K context; chart does not restate those settings. Retain table headline separately. The footnote says public data as of 22 September despite some later-named peers; this does not establish run dates. Only explicit numeric labels are imported, never unlabeled peer scores or dollar coordinates.

https://filecdn.minimax.chat/public/m31-flash-en-4-1792403273121.png

68.1% · raw 68.1 %

Alternative · high effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: mini-swe-agent, explicit labeled effort sweep. Main table states version 2.4.5 and 512K context; chart does not restate those settings. Retain table headline separately. The footnote says public data as of 22 September despite some later-named peers; this does not establish run dates. Only explicit numeric labels are imported, never unlabeled peer scores or dollar coordinates.

https://filecdn.minimax.chat/public/m31-flash-en-4-1792403273121.png

74% · raw 74 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: launch-tweet rounded summary; not a distinct evaluation. The detailed launch table remains headline. Effort/configuration is not restated in this summary.

https://x.com/minimax_ai/status/2112150867868541221
NL2Repo-Bench (MiniMax corrected task set)61.2%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

61.2% · raw 61.2 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: Claude Code 2.1.233; maximum context 512K; reward hacking assigned zero; two task specification/test inconsistencies corrected. Own vendor launch figure. Main figure contains no per-model effort labels. Execution date, exact checkpoint SHA, generation budget and sampling settings are unpublished. Source checked 2026-10-19.

https://filecdn.minimax.chat/public/m31-flash-en-2-1792403273121.png
SWE Refactor Bench23%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

23% · raw 23 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: Claude Code 2.1.220; maximum context 200K. Own vendor launch figure. Main figure contains no per-model effort labels. Execution date, exact checkpoint SHA, generation budget and sampling settings are unpublished. Source checked 2026-10-19.

https://filecdn.minimax.chat/public/m31-flash-en-2-1792403273121.png
CyberGym82.2%unknown effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

82.2% · raw 82.2 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: Claude Code 2.1.263; maximum context 1M. Own vendor launch figure. Main figure contains no per-model effort labels. Execution date, exact checkpoint SHA, generation budget and sampling settings are unpublished. Source checked 2026-10-19.

https://filecdn.minimax.chat/public/m31-flash-en-2-1792403273121.png

82% · raw 82 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: same launch claim, rounded prose value 82%; the table reports 82.2 with more precision and remains headline. This is not a second independently executed run.

https://www.minimax.io/blog/minimax-m31f
BabyVision (with tools)91%unknown effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

91% · raw 91 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: Claude Code 2.1.285; minimum image side 1,500 pixels; tools enabled. Own vendor launch figure. Main figure contains no per-model effort labels. Execution date, exact checkpoint SHA, generation budget and sampling settings are unpublished. Source checked 2026-10-19.

https://filecdn.minimax.chat/public/m31-flash-en-2-1792403273121.png

91% · raw 91 %

Alternative · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: launch-tweet rounded summary; not a distinct evaluation. The detailed launch table remains headline. Effort/configuration is not restated in this summary.

https://x.com/minimax_ai/status/2112150867868541221
Humanity's Last Exam (text-only, no tools)43.4%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

43.4% · raw 43.4 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: 2,158 text-only HLE questions, no tools. Own vendor launch figure. Main figure contains no per-model effort labels. Execution date, exact checkpoint SHA, generation budget and sampling settings are unpublished. Source checked 2026-10-19.

https://filecdn.minimax.chat/public/m31-flash-en-2-1792403273121.png
CharXiv RQ (GPT-5.5 judge)82.5%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

82.5% · raw 82.5 %

Headline · unknown effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: GPT-5.5 judge. Own vendor launch figure. Main figure contains no per-model effort labels. Execution date, exact checkpoint SHA, generation budget and sampling settings are unpublished. Source checked 2026-10-19.

https://filecdn.minimax.chat/public/m31-flash-en-2-1792403273121.png
AutomationBench v1.0.6 (Claude Code sweep)62.8%max effort
All 5 recorded results & sources

62.8% · raw 62.8 %

Headline · max effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: Claude Code, AutomationBench v1.0.6. Explicit labeled effort sweep; max is the headline. Source footnote public-model-data date 18 October is not an execution date. Main table 62.2 is a different unspecified setup, not silently replaced. No cost coordinate is estimated.

https://filecdn.minimax.chat/public/m31-flash-en-5-1792403273121.png

61.2% · raw 61.2 %

Alternative · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: Claude Code, AutomationBench v1.0.6. Explicit labeled effort sweep; max is the headline. Source footnote public-model-data date 18 October is not an execution date. Main table 62.2 is a different unspecified setup, not silently replaced. No cost coordinate is estimated.

https://filecdn.minimax.chat/public/m31-flash-en-5-1792403273121.png

59.2% · raw 59.2 %

Alternative · high effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: Claude Code, AutomationBench v1.0.6. Explicit labeled effort sweep; max is the headline. Source footnote public-model-data date 18 October is not an execution date. Main table 62.2 is a different unspecified setup, not silently replaced. No cost coordinate is estimated.

https://filecdn.minimax.chat/public/m31-flash-en-5-1792403273121.png

57.7% · raw 57.7 %

Alternative · medium effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: Claude Code, AutomationBench v1.0.6. Explicit labeled effort sweep; max is the headline. Source footnote public-model-data date 18 October is not an execution date. Main table 62.2 is a different unspecified setup, not silently replaced. No cost coordinate is estimated.

https://filecdn.minimax.chat/public/m31-flash-en-5-1792403273121.png

52.8% · raw 52.8 %

Alternative · low effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: Claude Code, AutomationBench v1.0.6. Explicit labeled effort sweep; max is the headline. Source footnote public-model-data date 18 October is not an execution date. Main table 62.2 is a different unspecified setup, not silently replaced. No cost coordinate is estimated.

https://filecdn.minimax.chat/public/m31-flash-en-5-1792403273121.png
ALE v1 Overall estimated total cost (MiniMax launch)$111.00max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

$111.00 · raw 111 USD

Headline · max effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: Claude Code max, ALE v1 Overall 152-task suite. Explicit $111 vendor-estimated total, not an invoice or per-task figure. Independent ALE frontend deliberately hides MiniMax costs; API database numbers are not published as independent costs.

https://filecdn.minimax.chat/public/m31-flash-en-3-1792403273121.png

Independent evaluators

Evaluator harnesses are distinct from vendor measurements. Missing coverage is not a failed test.

Independent evaluator headline scores; expand evidence for every record
Benchmark / evaluatorHeadline scoreEvidence
Vals Index v2.2 · Vals AI53.781%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

53.781% · raw 53.781 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. GDP-weighted aggregate with revised Finance v2.1, EMB v1.1, HLAB v1.1, Code Migration v1.1 and all-pass Tax. Old Index versions are not comparable. Source default includes provider-refusal fallback tasks for Opus/Sonnet; failure-controlled scores are separate. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":2597.835,"stderr":1.067,"cost_per_test":3.866285,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":18180722777,"output_tokens":306409526,"reasoning_tokens":243120444,"cache_read_tokens":17662797762,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index
Vals Index v2.2 · Cost per task · Vals AI$3.866285/taskmax effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

$3.866285/task · raw 3.866285 USD/task

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. GDP-weighted aggregate with revised Finance v2.1, EMB v1.1, HLAB v1.1, Code Migration v1.1 and all-pass Tax. Old Index versions are not comparable. Source default includes provider-refusal fallback tasks for Opus/Sonnet; failure-controlled scores are separate. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":2597.835,"stderr":1.067,"cost_per_test":3.866285,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":18180722777,"output_tokens":306409526,"reasoning_tokens":243120444,"cache_read_tokens":17662797762,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null} Source score standard error describes the benchmark quality score, not uncertainty in cost or latency.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index
Vals Index v2.2 · Task latency · Vals AI2597.835 smax effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

2597.835 s · raw 2597.835 s

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. GDP-weighted aggregate with revised Finance v2.1, EMB v1.1, HLAB v1.1, Code Migration v1.1 and all-pass Tax. Old Index versions are not comparable. Source default includes provider-refusal fallback tasks for Opus/Sonnet; failure-controlled scores are separate. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":2597.835,"stderr":1.067,"cost_per_test":3.866285,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":18180722777,"output_tokens":306409526,"reasoning_tokens":243120444,"cache_read_tokens":17662797762,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null} Source score standard error describes the benchmark quality score, not uncertainty in cost or latency.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index
Vals Index v2.2 · Vibe Code Bench v1.1 · Vals AI73.944%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

73.944% · raw 73.944 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: OpenHands. GDP-weighted aggregate with revised Finance v2.1, EMB v1.1, HLAB v1.1, Code Migration v1.1 and all-pass Tax. Old Index versions are not comparable. Source default includes provider-refusal fallback tasks for Opus/Sonnet; failure-controlled scores are separate. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1263.916,"stderr":4.249,"cost_per_test":8.568544,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":3334725307,"output_tokens":8488142,"reasoning_tokens":2462335,"cache_read_tokens":3318290676,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":"OpenHands"}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index
Vals Index v2.2 · Finance Agent v2.1 · Vals AI58.826%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

58.826% · raw 58.826 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. GDP-weighted aggregate with revised Finance v2.1, EMB v1.1, HLAB v1.1, Code Migration v1.1 and all-pass Tax. Old Index versions are not comparable. Source default includes provider-refusal fallback tasks for Opus/Sonnet; failure-controlled scores are separate. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":904.204,"stderr":2.07,"cost_per_test":0.158978,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":469331836,"output_tokens":54339785,"reasoning_tokens":45403914,"cache_read_tokens":234241552,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index
Vals Index v2.2 · EMB v1.1 · Vals AI67.843%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

67.843% · raw 67.843 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. GDP-weighted aggregate with revised Finance v2.1, EMB v1.1, HLAB v1.1, Code Migration v1.1 and all-pass Tax. Old Index versions are not comparable. Source default includes provider-refusal fallback tasks for Opus/Sonnet; failure-controlled scores are separate. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1847.78,"stderr":2.29,"cost_per_test":0.268958,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":1127000678,"output_tokens":14186544,"reasoning_tokens":10606514,"cache_read_tokens":1112061687,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index
Vals Index v2.2 · Code Migration v1.1 (index subset 50 CLI + 10 COBOL) · Vals AI48.195%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

48.195% · raw 48.195 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. GDP-weighted aggregate with revised Finance v2.1, EMB v1.1, HLAB v1.1, Code Migration v1.1 and all-pass Tax. Old Index versions are not comparable. Source default includes provider-refusal fallback tasks for Opus/Sonnet; failure-controlled scores are separate. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":7363.872,"stderr":3.35,"cost_per_test":12.723188,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":6238818064,"output_tokens":20288643,"reasoning_tokens":12068935,"cache_read_tokens":6202642760,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index
Vals Index v2.2 · Legal Research · Vals AI34.135%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

34.135% · raw 34.135 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. GDP-weighted aggregate with revised Finance v2.1, EMB v1.1, HLAB v1.1, Code Migration v1.1 and all-pass Tax. Old Index versions are not comparable. Source default includes provider-refusal fallback tasks for Opus/Sonnet; failure-controlled scores are separate. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":2911.983,"stderr":3.296,"cost_per_test":2.106744,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":1230685744,"output_tokens":102073269,"reasoning_tokens":90583933,"cache_read_tokens":1135801046,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index
Vals Index v2.2 · HLAB v1.1 · Vals AI7.500%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

7.500% · raw 7.5 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. GDP-weighted aggregate with revised Finance v2.1, EMB v1.1, HLAB v1.1, Code Migration v1.1 and all-pass Tax. Old Index versions are not comparable. Source default includes provider-refusal fallback tasks for Opus/Sonnet; failure-controlled scores are separate. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1497.601,"stderr":2.265,"cost_per_test":0.472848,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":2730849267,"output_tokens":20117381,"reasoning_tokens":6681765,"cache_read_tokens":2703378118,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index
Vals Index v2.2 · Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Vals AI25.253%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

25.253% · raw 25.253 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. GDP-weighted aggregate with revised Finance v2.1, EMB v1.1, HLAB v1.1, Code Migration v1.1 and all-pass Tax. Old Index versions are not comparable. Source default includes provider-refusal fallback tasks for Opus/Sonnet; failure-controlled scores are separate. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":3030.551,"stderr":1.01,"cost_per_test":5.202085,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":2497428556,"output_tokens":16603505,"reasoning_tokens":13158836,"cache_read_tokens":2489516469,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index
Vals Index v2.2 · Tax Agent · Vals AI32.136%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

32.136% · raw 32.136 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. GDP-weighted aggregate with revised Finance v2.1, EMB v1.1, HLAB v1.1, Code Migration v1.1 and all-pass Tax. Old Index versions are not comparable. Source default includes provider-refusal fallback tasks for Opus/Sonnet; failure-controlled scores are separate. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1962.771,"stderr":3.342,"cost_per_test":1.428933,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":551883325,"output_tokens":70312257,"reasoning_tokens":62154212,"cache_read_tokens":466865454,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index
Finance Agent v2.1 · Vals AI58.826%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

58.826% · raw 58.826 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. FAB v2 harness on expert-reviewed FABv2.1 questions/rubrics, revised judge jury and hedged-answer prompt. Partial-credit accuracy differs from all-pass. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":904.204,"stderr":2.07,"cost_per_test":0.158978,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":469331836,"output_tokens":54339785,"reasoning_tokens":45403914,"cache_read_tokens":234241552,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1
Finance Agent v2.1 · Cost per task · Vals AI$0.158978/taskmax effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

$0.158978/task · raw 0.158978 USD/task

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. FAB v2 harness on expert-reviewed FABv2.1 questions/rubrics, revised judge jury and hedged-answer prompt. Partial-credit accuracy differs from all-pass. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":904.204,"stderr":2.07,"cost_per_test":0.158978,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":469331836,"output_tokens":54339785,"reasoning_tokens":45403914,"cache_read_tokens":234241552,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null} Source score standard error describes the benchmark quality score, not uncertainty in cost or latency.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1
Finance Agent v2.1 · Task latency · Vals AI904.204 smax effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

904.204 s · raw 904.204 s

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. FAB v2 harness on expert-reviewed FABv2.1 questions/rubrics, revised judge jury and hedged-answer prompt. Partial-credit accuracy differs from all-pass. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":904.204,"stderr":2.07,"cost_per_test":0.158978,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":469331836,"output_tokens":54339785,"reasoning_tokens":45403914,"cache_read_tokens":234241552,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null} Source score standard error describes the benchmark quality score, not uncertainty in cost or latency.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1
Finance Agent v2.1 · All-Pass Accuracy · Vals AI45.595%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

45.595% · raw 45.595 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. FAB v2 harness on expert-reviewed FABv2.1 questions/rubrics, revised judge jury and hedged-answer prompt. Partial-credit accuracy differs from all-pass. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":904.204,"stderr":2.206,"cost_per_test":0.158978,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":469331836,"output_tokens":54339785,"reasoning_tokens":45403914,"cache_read_tokens":234241552,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1
Finance Agent v2.1 · General Qualitative Analysis · Vals AI73.855%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

73.855% · raw 73.855 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. FAB v2 harness on expert-reviewed FABv2.1 questions/rubrics, revised judge jury and hedged-answer prompt. Partial-credit accuracy differs from all-pass. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1265.243,"stderr":5.425,"cost_per_test":0.223672,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1
Finance Agent v2.1 · General Quantitative Analysis · Vals AI73.741%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

73.741% · raw 73.741 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. FAB v2 harness on expert-reviewed FABv2.1 questions/rubrics, revised judge jury and hedged-answer prompt. Partial-credit accuracy differs from all-pass. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":722.092,"stderr":5.482,"cost_per_test":0.142236,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1
Finance Agent v2.1 · Market Analysis · Vals AI55.738%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

55.738% · raw 55.738 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. FAB v2 harness on expert-reviewed FABv2.1 questions/rubrics, revised judge jury and hedged-answer prompt. Partial-credit accuracy differs from all-pass. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":795.075,"stderr":6.969,"cost_per_test":0.125556,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1
Finance Agent v2.1 · Comparables · Vals AI53.008%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

53.008% · raw 53.008 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. FAB v2 harness on expert-reviewed FABv2.1 questions/rubrics, revised judge jury and hedged-answer prompt. Partial-credit accuracy differs from all-pass. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1155.838,"stderr":6.676,"cost_per_test":0.2003,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1
Finance Agent v2.1 · Precedents · Vals AI33.919%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

33.919% · raw 33.919 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. FAB v2 harness on expert-reviewed FABv2.1 questions/rubrics, revised judge jury and hedged-answer prompt. Partial-credit accuracy differs from all-pass. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1225.044,"stderr":6.7,"cost_per_test":0.222412,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1
Finance Agent v2.1 · Adjustments · Vals AI59.658%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

59.658% · raw 59.658 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. FAB v2 harness on expert-reviewed FABv2.1 questions/rubrics, revised judge jury and hedged-answer prompt. Partial-credit accuracy differs from all-pass. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":812.371,"stderr":6.963,"cost_per_test":0.144584,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1
Finance Agent v2.1 · Earnings Analysis · Vals AI82.124%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

82.124% · raw 82.124 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. FAB v2 harness on expert-reviewed FABv2.1 questions/rubrics, revised judge jury and hedged-answer prompt. Partial-credit accuracy differs from all-pass. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":643.947,"stderr":5.244,"cost_per_test":0.078555,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1
Finance Agent v2.1 · Disclosure Analysis · Vals AI70.509%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

70.509% · raw 70.509 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. FAB v2 harness on expert-reviewed FABv2.1 questions/rubrics, revised judge jury and hedged-answer prompt. Partial-credit accuracy differs from all-pass. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1102.958,"stderr":6.171,"cost_per_test":0.19942,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1
Finance Agent v2.1 · Financial Modeling · Vals AI26.881%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

26.881% · raw 26.881 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. FAB v2 harness on expert-reviewed FABv2.1 questions/rubrics, revised judge jury and hedged-answer prompt. Partial-credit accuracy differs from all-pass. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":513.254,"stderr":5.969,"cost_per_test":0.104852,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Vals AI67.843%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

67.843% · raw 67.843 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Seven equally weighted category scores combining Template and Scratch. GPT-6 Luna Scratch judge and Template sheet-name scoring fixes; not comparable with v1.0. Partial credit is not client-ready quality. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1847.78,"stderr":2.29,"cost_per_test":0.268958,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":1127000678,"output_tokens":14186544,"reasoning_tokens":10606514,"cache_read_tokens":1112061687,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Cost per task · Vals AI$0.268958/taskmax effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

$0.268958/task · raw 0.268958 USD/task

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Seven equally weighted category scores combining Template and Scratch. GPT-6 Luna Scratch judge and Template sheet-name scoring fixes; not comparable with v1.0. Partial credit is not client-ready quality. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1847.78,"stderr":2.29,"cost_per_test":0.268958,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":1127000678,"output_tokens":14186544,"reasoning_tokens":10606514,"cache_read_tokens":1112061687,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null} Source score standard error describes the benchmark quality score, not uncertainty in cost or latency.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Task latency · Vals AI1847.780 smax effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

1847.780 s · raw 1847.78 s

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Seven equally weighted category scores combining Template and Scratch. GPT-6 Luna Scratch judge and Template sheet-name scoring fixes; not comparable with v1.0. Partial credit is not client-ready quality. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1847.78,"stderr":2.29,"cost_per_test":0.268958,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":1127000678,"output_tokens":14186544,"reasoning_tokens":10606514,"cache_read_tokens":1112061687,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null} Source score standard error describes the benchmark quality score, not uncertainty in cost or latency.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Template · Vals AI71.645%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

71.645% · raw 71.645 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Seven equally weighted category scores combining Template and Scratch. GPT-6 Luna Scratch judge and Template sheet-name scoring fixes; not comparable with v1.0. Partial credit is not client-ready quality. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1872.953,"stderr":2.773,"cost_per_test":0.295804,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Scratch · Vals AI63.888%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

63.888% · raw 63.888 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Seven equally weighted category scores combining Template and Scratch. GPT-6 Luna Scratch judge and Template sheet-name scoring fixes; not comparable with v1.0. Partial credit is not client-ready quality. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1822.607,"stderr":2.408,"cost_per_test":0.242112,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · LBO · Vals AI58.626%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

58.626% · raw 58.626 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Seven equally weighted category scores combining Template and Scratch. GPT-6 Luna Scratch judge and Template sheet-name scoring fixes; not comparable with v1.0. Partial credit is not client-ready quality. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":3945.157,"stderr":4.241,"cost_per_test":0.546001,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · DCF · Vals AI58.739%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

58.739% · raw 58.739 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Seven equally weighted category scores combining Template and Scratch. GPT-6 Luna Scratch judge and Template sheet-name scoring fixes; not comparable with v1.0. Partial credit is not client-ready quality. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":2759.397,"stderr":6.7,"cost_per_test":0.244351,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · M&A · Vals AI74.391%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

74.391% · raw 74.391 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Seven equally weighted category scores combining Template and Scratch. GPT-6 Luna Scratch judge and Template sheet-name scoring fixes; not comparable with v1.0. Partial credit is not client-ready quality. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":2537.751,"stderr":3.297,"cost_per_test":0.195966,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Operating · Vals AI66.456%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

66.456% · raw 66.456 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Seven equally weighted category scores combining Template and Scratch. GPT-6 Luna Scratch judge and Template sheet-name scoring fixes; not comparable with v1.0. Partial credit is not client-ready quality. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":861.196,"stderr":4.786,"cost_per_test":0.189071,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Comps · Vals AI71.581%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

71.581% · raw 71.581 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Seven equally weighted category scores combining Template and Scratch. GPT-6 Luna Scratch judge and Template sheet-name scoring fixes; not comparable with v1.0. Partial credit is not client-ready quality. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":770.52,"stderr":3.537,"cost_per_test":0.255073,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Dataroom · Vals AI80.223%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

80.223% · raw 80.223 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Seven equally weighted category scores combining Template and Scratch. GPT-6 Luna Scratch judge and Template sheet-name scoring fixes; not comparable with v1.0. Partial credit is not client-ready quality. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":826.821,"stderr":5.877,"cost_per_test":0.175491,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Misc · Vals AI64.885%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

64.885% · raw 64.885 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Seven equally weighted category scores combining Template and Scratch. GPT-6 Luna Scratch judge and Template sheet-name scoring fixes; not comparable with v1.0. Partial credit is not client-ready quality. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1125.671,"stderr":2.834,"cost_per_test":0.247506,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Template · LBO · Vals AI64.846%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

64.846% · raw 64.846 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Seven equally weighted category scores combining Template and Scratch. GPT-6 Luna Scratch judge and Template sheet-name scoring fixes; not comparable with v1.0. Partial credit is not client-ready quality. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1847.78,"stderr":2.29,"cost_per_test":0.268958,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":1127000678,"output_tokens":14186544,"reasoning_tokens":10606514,"cache_read_tokens":1112061687,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Scratch · LBO · Vals AI52.407%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

52.407% · raw 52.407 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Seven equally weighted category scores combining Template and Scratch. GPT-6 Luna Scratch judge and Template sheet-name scoring fixes; not comparable with v1.0. Partial credit is not client-ready quality. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1847.78,"stderr":2.29,"cost_per_test":0.268958,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":1127000678,"output_tokens":14186544,"reasoning_tokens":10606514,"cache_read_tokens":1112061687,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Template · DCF · Vals AI60.973%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

60.973% · raw 60.973 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Seven equally weighted category scores combining Template and Scratch. GPT-6 Luna Scratch judge and Template sheet-name scoring fixes; not comparable with v1.0. Partial credit is not client-ready quality. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1847.78,"stderr":2.29,"cost_per_test":0.268958,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":1127000678,"output_tokens":14186544,"reasoning_tokens":10606514,"cache_read_tokens":1112061687,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Scratch · DCF · Vals AI56.505%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

56.505% · raw 56.505 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Seven equally weighted category scores combining Template and Scratch. GPT-6 Luna Scratch judge and Template sheet-name scoring fixes; not comparable with v1.0. Partial credit is not client-ready quality. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1847.78,"stderr":2.29,"cost_per_test":0.268958,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":1127000678,"output_tokens":14186544,"reasoning_tokens":10606514,"cache_read_tokens":1112061687,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Template · MA · Vals AI76.446%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

76.446% · raw 76.446 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Seven equally weighted category scores combining Template and Scratch. GPT-6 Luna Scratch judge and Template sheet-name scoring fixes; not comparable with v1.0. Partial credit is not client-ready quality. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1847.78,"stderr":2.29,"cost_per_test":0.268958,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":1127000678,"output_tokens":14186544,"reasoning_tokens":10606514,"cache_read_tokens":1112061687,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Scratch · MA · Vals AI72.337%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

72.337% · raw 72.337 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Seven equally weighted category scores combining Template and Scratch. GPT-6 Luna Scratch judge and Template sheet-name scoring fixes; not comparable with v1.0. Partial credit is not client-ready quality. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1847.78,"stderr":2.29,"cost_per_test":0.268958,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":1127000678,"output_tokens":14186544,"reasoning_tokens":10606514,"cache_read_tokens":1112061687,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Template · OPERATING · Vals AI72.048%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

72.048% · raw 72.048 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Seven equally weighted category scores combining Template and Scratch. GPT-6 Luna Scratch judge and Template sheet-name scoring fixes; not comparable with v1.0. Partial credit is not client-ready quality. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1847.78,"stderr":2.29,"cost_per_test":0.268958,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":1127000678,"output_tokens":14186544,"reasoning_tokens":10606514,"cache_read_tokens":1112061687,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Scratch · OPERATING · Vals AI60.864%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

60.864% · raw 60.864 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Seven equally weighted category scores combining Template and Scratch. GPT-6 Luna Scratch judge and Template sheet-name scoring fixes; not comparable with v1.0. Partial credit is not client-ready quality. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1847.78,"stderr":2.29,"cost_per_test":0.268958,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":1127000678,"output_tokens":14186544,"reasoning_tokens":10606514,"cache_read_tokens":1112061687,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Template · COMPS · Vals AI75.467%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

75.467% · raw 75.467 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Seven equally weighted category scores combining Template and Scratch. GPT-6 Luna Scratch judge and Template sheet-name scoring fixes; not comparable with v1.0. Partial credit is not client-ready quality. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1847.78,"stderr":2.29,"cost_per_test":0.268958,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":1127000678,"output_tokens":14186544,"reasoning_tokens":10606514,"cache_read_tokens":1112061687,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Scratch · COMPS · Vals AI67.695%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

67.695% · raw 67.695 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Seven equally weighted category scores combining Template and Scratch. GPT-6 Luna Scratch judge and Template sheet-name scoring fixes; not comparable with v1.0. Partial credit is not client-ready quality. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1847.78,"stderr":2.29,"cost_per_test":0.268958,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":1127000678,"output_tokens":14186544,"reasoning_tokens":10606514,"cache_read_tokens":1112061687,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Template · DATAROOM · Vals AI84.148%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

84.148% · raw 84.148 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Seven equally weighted category scores combining Template and Scratch. GPT-6 Luna Scratch judge and Template sheet-name scoring fixes; not comparable with v1.0. Partial credit is not client-ready quality. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1847.78,"stderr":2.29,"cost_per_test":0.268958,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":1127000678,"output_tokens":14186544,"reasoning_tokens":10606514,"cache_read_tokens":1112061687,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Scratch · DATAROOM · Vals AI76.298%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

76.298% · raw 76.298 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Seven equally weighted category scores combining Template and Scratch. GPT-6 Luna Scratch judge and Template sheet-name scoring fixes; not comparable with v1.0. Partial credit is not client-ready quality. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1847.78,"stderr":2.29,"cost_per_test":0.268958,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":1127000678,"output_tokens":14186544,"reasoning_tokens":10606514,"cache_read_tokens":1112061687,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Template · MISC · Vals AI67.341%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

67.341% · raw 67.341 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Seven equally weighted category scores combining Template and Scratch. GPT-6 Luna Scratch judge and Template sheet-name scoring fixes; not comparable with v1.0. Partial credit is not client-ready quality. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1847.78,"stderr":2.29,"cost_per_test":0.268958,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":1127000678,"output_tokens":14186544,"reasoning_tokens":10606514,"cache_read_tokens":1112061687,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Scratch · MISC · Vals AI62.430%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

62.430% · raw 62.43 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Seven equally weighted category scores combining Template and Scratch. GPT-6 Luna Scratch judge and Template sheet-name scoring fixes; not comparable with v1.0. Partial credit is not client-ready quality. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1847.78,"stderr":2.29,"cost_per_test":0.268958,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":1127000678,"output_tokens":14186544,"reasoning_tokens":10606514,"cache_read_tokens":1112061687,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Scratch rubric · Numerical · Vals AI55.232%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

55.232% · raw 55.232 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Seven equally weighted category scores combining Template and Scratch. GPT-6 Luna Scratch judge and Template sheet-name scoring fixes; not comparable with v1.0. Partial credit is not client-ready quality. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1847.78,"stderr":2.29,"cost_per_test":0.268958,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":1127000678,"output_tokens":14186544,"reasoning_tokens":10606514,"cache_read_tokens":1112061687,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Scratch rubric · Formula · Vals AI84.866%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

84.866% · raw 84.866 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Seven equally weighted category scores combining Template and Scratch. GPT-6 Luna Scratch judge and Template sheet-name scoring fixes; not comparable with v1.0. Partial credit is not client-ready quality. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1847.78,"stderr":2.29,"cost_per_test":0.268958,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":1127000678,"output_tokens":14186544,"reasoning_tokens":10606514,"cache_read_tokens":1112061687,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Scratch rubric · Presentation · Vals AI73.299%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

73.299% · raw 73.299 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Seven equally weighted category scores combining Template and Scratch. GPT-6 Luna Scratch judge and Template sheet-name scoring fixes; not comparable with v1.0. Partial credit is not client-ready quality. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1847.78,"stderr":2.29,"cost_per_test":0.268958,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":1127000678,"output_tokens":14186544,"reasoning_tokens":10606514,"cache_read_tokens":1112061687,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Vals AI7.500%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

7.500% · raw 7.5 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1497.601,"stderr":2.265,"cost_per_test":0.472848,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":2730849267,"output_tokens":20117381,"reasoning_tokens":6681765,"cache_read_tokens":2703378118,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Cost per task · Vals AI$0.472848/taskmax effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

$0.472848/task · raw 0.472848 USD/task

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1497.601,"stderr":2.265,"cost_per_test":0.472848,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":2730849267,"output_tokens":20117381,"reasoning_tokens":6681765,"cache_read_tokens":2703378118,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null} Source score standard error describes the benchmark quality score, not uncertainty in cost or latency.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task latency · Vals AI1497.601 smax effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

1497.601 s · raw 1497.601 s

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1497.601,"stderr":2.265,"cost_per_test":0.472848,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":2730849267,"output_tokens":20117381,"reasoning_tokens":6681765,"cache_read_tokens":2703378118,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null} Source score standard error describes the benchmark quality score, not uncertainty in cost or latency.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Antitrust Competition · Vals AI0.000%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

0.000% · raw 0 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1602.082,"stderr":0.0,"cost_per_test":0.447689,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Arbitration International Dispute Resolution · Vals AI0.000%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

0.000% · raw 0 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1490.442,"stderr":0.0,"cost_per_test":0.572096,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Banking Finance · Vals AI0.000%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

0.000% · raw 0 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1557.112,"stderr":0.0,"cost_per_test":0.363031,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Bankruptcy Restructuring · Vals AI0.000%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

0.000% · raw 0 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1586.546,"stderr":0.0,"cost_per_test":0.501587,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Capital Markets · Vals AI0.000%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

0.000% · raw 0 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1222.418,"stderr":0.0,"cost_per_test":0.336279,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Corporate Governance · Vals AI20.000%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

20.000% · raw 20 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":2097.538,"stderr":20.0,"cost_per_test":0.628725,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Corporate Ma · Vals AI0.000%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

0.000% · raw 0 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1048.75,"stderr":0.0,"cost_per_test":0.385034,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Data Privacy Cybersecurity · Vals AI20.000%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

20.000% · raw 20 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1603.698,"stderr":12.247,"cost_per_test":0.652971,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Emerging Companies Venture Capital · Vals AI0.000%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

0.000% · raw 0 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1523.606,"stderr":0.0,"cost_per_test":0.437811,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Employment Labor · Vals AI0.000%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

0.000% · raw 0 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1855.334,"stderr":0.0,"cost_per_test":0.426654,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Energy Natural Resources · Vals AI40.000%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

40.000% · raw 40 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1434.758,"stderr":24.495,"cost_per_test":0.616064,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Environmental Esg · Vals AI0.000%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

0.000% · raw 0 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1706.268,"stderr":0.0,"cost_per_test":0.440838,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Funds Asset Management · Vals AI10.000%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

10.000% · raw 10 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1901.926,"stderr":10.0,"cost_per_test":0.565023,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Healthcare Life Sciences · Vals AI20.000%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

20.000% · raw 20 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1851.156,"stderr":20.0,"cost_per_test":0.526994,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Immigration · Vals AI20.000%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

20.000% · raw 20 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1131.4,"stderr":20.0,"cost_per_test":0.37483,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Insurance · Vals AI0.000%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

0.000% · raw 0 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1028.702,"stderr":0.0,"cost_per_test":0.343356,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Intellectual Property · Vals AI20.000%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

20.000% · raw 20 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1452.402,"stderr":20.0,"cost_per_test":0.496673,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · International Trade Sanctions · Vals AI0.000%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

0.000% · raw 0 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1530.654,"stderr":0.0,"cost_per_test":0.355021,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Litigation Dispute Resolution · Vals AI10.000%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

10.000% · raw 10 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1470.038,"stderr":10.0,"cost_per_test":0.48408,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Real Estate · Vals AI0.000%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

0.000% · raw 0 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1428.066,"stderr":0.0,"cost_per_test":0.471568,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Structured Finance Securitization · Vals AI20.000%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

20.000% · raw 20 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1092.26,"stderr":20.0,"cost_per_test":0.430794,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Tax · Vals AI0.000%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

0.000% · raw 0 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1483.114,"stderr":0.0,"cost_per_test":0.548613,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Trusts Estates Private Client · Vals AI0.000%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

0.000% · raw 0 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1486.298,"stderr":0.0,"cost_per_test":0.4795,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · White Collar Defense Investigations · Vals AI0.000%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

0.000% · raw 0 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1357.85,"stderr":0.0,"cost_per_test":0.463122,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Vals AI91.077%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

91.077% · raw 91.077 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1497.601,"stderr":0.343,"cost_per_test":0.472848,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":2730849267,"output_tokens":20117381,"reasoning_tokens":6681765,"cache_read_tokens":2703378118,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Antitrust Competition · Vals AI92.029%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

92.029% · raw 92.029 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1602.082,"stderr":1.633,"cost_per_test":0.447689,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Arbitration International Dispute Resolution · Vals AI88.351%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

88.351% · raw 88.351 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1490.442,"stderr":1.924,"cost_per_test":0.572096,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Banking Finance · Vals AI93.657%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

93.657% · raw 93.657 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1557.112,"stderr":1.492,"cost_per_test":0.363031,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Bankruptcy Restructuring · Vals AI87.716%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

87.716% · raw 87.716 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1586.546,"stderr":1.934,"cost_per_test":0.501587,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Capital Markets · Vals AI92.353%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

92.353% · raw 92.353 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1222.418,"stderr":1.667,"cost_per_test":0.336279,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Corporate Governance · Vals AI91.438%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

91.438% · raw 91.438 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":2097.538,"stderr":1.64,"cost_per_test":0.628725,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Corporate Ma · Vals AI96.302%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

96.302% · raw 96.302 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1048.75,"stderr":1.072,"cost_per_test":0.385034,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Data Privacy Cybersecurity · Vals AI96.820%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

96.820% · raw 96.82 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1603.698,"stderr":1.045,"cost_per_test":0.652971,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Emerging Companies Venture Capital · Vals AI94.539%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

94.539% · raw 94.539 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1523.606,"stderr":1.33,"cost_per_test":0.437811,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Employment Labor · Vals AI82.210%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

82.210% · raw 82.21 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1855.334,"stderr":2.345,"cost_per_test":0.426654,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Energy Natural Resources · Vals AI95.875%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

95.875% · raw 95.875 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1434.758,"stderr":1.144,"cost_per_test":0.616064,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Environmental Esg · Vals AI89.427%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

89.427% · raw 89.427 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1706.268,"stderr":1.844,"cost_per_test":0.440838,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Funds Asset Management · Vals AI87.901%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

87.901% · raw 87.901 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1901.926,"stderr":1.763,"cost_per_test":0.565023,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Healthcare Life Sciences · Vals AI95.134%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

95.134% · raw 95.134 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1851.156,"stderr":1.248,"cost_per_test":0.526994,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Immigration · Vals AI90.727%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

90.727% · raw 90.727 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1131.4,"stderr":1.752,"cost_per_test":0.37483,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Insurance · Vals AI90.074%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

90.074% · raw 90.074 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1028.702,"stderr":1.816,"cost_per_test":0.343356,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Intellectual Property · Vals AI92.349%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

92.349% · raw 92.349 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1452.402,"stderr":1.589,"cost_per_test":0.496673,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · International Trade Sanctions · Vals AI91.434%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

91.434% · raw 91.434 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1530.654,"stderr":1.77,"cost_per_test":0.355021,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Litigation Dispute Resolution · Vals AI91.917%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

91.917% · raw 91.917 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1470.038,"stderr":1.674,"cost_per_test":0.48408,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Real Estate · Vals AI92.420%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

92.420% · raw 92.42 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1428.066,"stderr":1.431,"cost_per_test":0.471568,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Structured Finance Securitization · Vals AI87.581%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

87.581% · raw 87.581 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1092.26,"stderr":1.876,"cost_per_test":0.430794,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Tax · Vals AI84.281%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

84.281% · raw 84.281 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1483.114,"stderr":2.108,"cost_per_test":0.548613,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Trusts Estates Private Client · Vals AI89.504%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

89.504% · raw 89.504 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1486.298,"stderr":1.897,"cost_per_test":0.4795,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · White Collar Defense Investigations · Vals AI91.414%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

91.414% · raw 91.414 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Harvey held-out legal work protocol, internet disabled, GPT5.5 medium and Sonnet4.6 judges. Task pass requires every criterion; final is mean of two judges. Criteria-pass rate is separate. DOCX tracked-change grading fix. Distinct from AA hallucination-gated LAB. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1357.85,"stderr":1.628,"cost_per_test":0.463122,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
Tax Agent Bench Accuracy (all-pass, citation-adjusted) · Vals AI32.136%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

32.136% · raw 32.136 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Private193-item tax suite. All-pass accuracy and must-pass weighted partial credit are separate; both multiply by citation factor0.7+0.3*citation quality. No inferred tax professional reliability. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1962.771,"stderr":3.342,"cost_per_test":1.428933,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":551883325,"output_tokens":70312257,"reasoning_tokens":62154212,"cache_read_tokens":466865454,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Tax Agent Bench · Cost per task · Vals AI$1.428933/taskmax effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

$1.428933/task · raw 1.428933 USD/task

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Private193-item tax suite. All-pass accuracy and must-pass weighted partial credit are separate; both multiply by citation factor0.7+0.3*citation quality. No inferred tax professional reliability. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1962.771,"stderr":3.342,"cost_per_test":1.428933,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":551883325,"output_tokens":70312257,"reasoning_tokens":62154212,"cache_read_tokens":466865454,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null} Source score standard error describes the benchmark quality score, not uncertainty in cost or latency.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Tax Agent Bench · Task latency · Vals AI1962.771 smax effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

1962.771 s · raw 1962.771 s

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Private193-item tax suite. All-pass accuracy and must-pass weighted partial credit are separate; both multiply by citation factor0.7+0.3*citation quality. No inferred tax professional reliability. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1962.771,"stderr":3.342,"cost_per_test":1.428933,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":551883325,"output_tokens":70312257,"reasoning_tokens":62154212,"cache_read_tokens":466865454,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null} Source score standard error describes the benchmark quality score, not uncertainty in cost or latency.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Tax Agent Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Fact-Pattern Analysis · Vals AI31.860%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

31.860% · raw 31.86 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Private193-item tax suite. All-pass accuracy and must-pass weighted partial credit are separate; both multiply by citation factor0.7+0.3*citation quality. No inferred tax professional reliability. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1831.299,"stderr":7.108,"cost_per_test":1.25238,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Tax Agent Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Rule & Source Lookup · Vals AI36.667%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

36.667% · raw 36.667 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Private193-item tax suite. All-pass accuracy and must-pass weighted partial credit are separate; both multiply by citation factor0.7+0.3*citation quality. No inferred tax professional reliability. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":2279.728,"stderr":8.949,"cost_per_test":1.823243,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Tax Agent Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Current & Temporal Analysis · Vals AI31.202%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

31.202% · raw 31.202 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Private193-item tax suite. All-pass accuracy and must-pass weighted partial credit are separate; both multiply by citation factor0.7+0.3*citation quality. No inferred tax professional reliability. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":2472.42,"stderr":8.292,"cost_per_test":1.70664,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Tax Agent Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Numbers & Calculations · Vals AI59.875%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

59.875% · raw 59.875 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Private193-item tax suite. All-pass accuracy and must-pass weighted partial credit are separate; both multiply by citation factor0.7+0.3*citation quality. No inferred tax professional reliability. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1323.436,"stderr":9.079,"cost_per_test":0.869841,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Tax Agent Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Forms & Filings · Vals AI26.667%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

26.667% · raw 26.667 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Private193-item tax suite. All-pass accuracy and must-pass weighted partial credit are separate; both multiply by citation factor0.7+0.3*citation quality. No inferred tax professional reliability. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1834.474,"stderr":8.212,"cost_per_test":1.399246,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Tax Agent Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Controversy & Precedence Analysis · Vals AI6.667%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

6.667% · raw 6.667 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Private193-item tax suite. All-pass accuracy and must-pass weighted partial credit are separate; both multiply by citation factor0.7+0.3*citation quality. No inferred tax professional reliability. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":2129.255,"stderr":4.632,"cost_per_test":1.598752,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Tax Agent Bench Weighted Pass (citation-adjusted) · Vals AI62.715%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

62.715% · raw 62.715 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Private193-item tax suite. All-pass accuracy and must-pass weighted partial credit are separate; both multiply by citation factor0.7+0.3*citation quality. No inferred tax professional reliability. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1962.771,"stderr":3.255,"cost_per_test":1.428933,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":551883325,"output_tokens":70312257,"reasoning_tokens":62154212,"cache_read_tokens":466865454,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Tax Agent Bench · Weighted Pass · Fact-Pattern Analysis · Vals AI50.785%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

50.785% · raw 50.785 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Private193-item tax suite. All-pass accuracy and must-pass weighted partial credit are separate; both multiply by citation factor0.7+0.3*citation quality. No inferred tax professional reliability. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1831.299,"stderr":7.357,"cost_per_test":1.25238,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Tax Agent Bench · Weighted Pass · Rule & Source Lookup · Vals AI57.664%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

57.664% · raw 57.664 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Private193-item tax suite. All-pass accuracy and must-pass weighted partial credit are separate; both multiply by citation factor0.7+0.3*citation quality. No inferred tax professional reliability. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":2279.728,"stderr":8.78,"cost_per_test":1.823243,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Tax Agent Bench · Weighted Pass · Current & Temporal Analysis · Vals AI58.878%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

58.878% · raw 58.878 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Private193-item tax suite. All-pass accuracy and must-pass weighted partial credit are separate; both multiply by citation factor0.7+0.3*citation quality. No inferred tax professional reliability. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":2472.42,"stderr":8.436,"cost_per_test":1.70664,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Tax Agent Bench · Weighted Pass · Numbers & Calculations · Vals AI84.510%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

84.510% · raw 84.51 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Private193-item tax suite. All-pass accuracy and must-pass weighted partial credit are separate; both multiply by citation factor0.7+0.3*citation quality. No inferred tax professional reliability. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1323.436,"stderr":6.192,"cost_per_test":0.869841,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Tax Agent Bench · Weighted Pass · Forms & Filings · Vals AI75.287%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

75.287% · raw 75.287 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Private193-item tax suite. All-pass accuracy and must-pass weighted partial credit are separate; both multiply by citation factor0.7+0.3*citation quality. No inferred tax professional reliability. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1834.474,"stderr":7.105,"cost_per_test":1.399246,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Tax Agent Bench · Weighted Pass · Controversy & Precedence Analysis · Vals AI54.339%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

54.339% · raw 54.339 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: publisher benchmark protocol. Private193-item tax suite. All-pass accuracy and must-pass weighted partial credit are separate; both multiply by citation factor0.7+0.3*citation quality. No inferred tax professional reliability. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":2129.255,"stderr":8.313,"cost_per_test":1.598752,"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":null}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Vibe Code Bench v1.1 · Vals AI73.944%max effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

73.944% · raw 73.944 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: OpenHands. Independent model-plus-harness web-application evaluation. Preserve OpenHands versus other agent variants; source costs/runtime are task observations, not API tariffs. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1263.916,"stderr":4.249,"cost_per_test":8.568544,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":3334725307,"output_tokens":8488142,"reasoning_tokens":2462335,"cache_read_tokens":3318290676,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":"OpenHands"}

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vibe-code
Vibe Code Bench v1.1 cost per task · Vals AI$8.568544/taskmax effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

$8.568544/task · raw 8.568544 USD/task

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: OpenHands. Independent model-plus-harness web-application evaluation. Preserve OpenHands versus other agent variants; source costs/runtime are task observations, not API tariffs. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1263.916,"stderr":4.249,"cost_per_test":8.568544,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":3334725307,"output_tokens":8488142,"reasoning_tokens":2462335,"cache_read_tokens":3318290676,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":"OpenHands"} Source score standard error describes the benchmark quality score, not uncertainty in cost or latency.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vibe-code
Vibe Code Bench v1.1 · Task latency · Vals AI1263.916 smax effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

1263.916 s · raw 1263.916 s

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: OpenHands. Independent model-plus-harness web-application evaluation. Preserve OpenHands versus other agent variants; source costs/runtime are task observations, not API tariffs. Published summary updated 19 October 2026; exact run dates and serving weight SHA unpublished. Requested effort from published reasoning_effort/compute_effort is not a common compute budget. Raw source diagnostics: {"latency":1263.916,"stderr":4.249,"cost_per_test":8.568544,"token_totals":{"input_tokens":3334725307,"output_tokens":8488142,"reasoning_tokens":2462335,"cache_read_tokens":3318290676,"cache_write_tokens":0},"temperature":1.0,"top_p":0.95,"max_output_tokens":262144,"reasoning":null,"reasoning_effort":null,"verbosity":null,"compute_effort":"max","provider":"MiniMax","harness":"OpenHands"} Source score standard error describes the benchmark quality score, not uncertainty in cost or latency.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vibe-code
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Acronyms · Artificial Analysis2.59 acronyms/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

2.59 acronyms/response · raw 2.59 acronyms/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Acronyms: Two or more capital letters in a row (AI, USA) or dotted forms (U.S.). Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 2.59.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Avg. sentence length · Artificial Analysis15.50 words/sentenceunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

15.50 words/sentence · raw 15.5 words/sentence

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Avg. sentence length: Words divided by sentences. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 15.5.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Bold text · Artificial Analysis10.60 bold spans/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

10.60 bold spans/response · raw 10.6 bold spans/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Bold text: Uses of bold: each unbroken run of bold text counts once, so a single bolded word and a fully bolded sentence both count as 1. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 10.6.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Characters · Artificial Analysis3361 characters/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

3361 characters/response · raw 3361 characters/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Characters: Characters in the prose, spaces included, after code and URLs are removed. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 3,361.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Colons · Artificial Analysis7.63 colons/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

7.63 colons/response · raw 7.63 colons/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Colons: Colons. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 7.63.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Contractions · Artificial Analysis3.42 contractions/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

3.42 contractions/response · raw 3.42 contractions/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Contractions: Contractions such as “don’t”, “you’re” and “it’s”; possessives such as “John’s” do not count. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 3.42.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Ellipses · Artificial Analysis0.06 ellipses/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

0.06 ellipses/response · raw 0.06 ellipses/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Ellipses: Three periods (...) or the ellipsis character (…). Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 0.06.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Em dashes · Artificial Analysis2.85 em dashes/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

2.85 em dashes/response · raw 2.85 em dashes/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Em dashes: The em dash character (—); double hyphens do not count. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 2.85.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Emojis · Artificial Analysis0.01 emojis/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

0.01 emojis/response · raw 0.01 emojis/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Emojis: Each emoji as the reader sees it. An emoji built from several characters, such as a family (👨‍👩‍👧), still counts as one emoji. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 0.01.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Ends with a question · Artificial Analysis2%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

2% · raw 2 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Ends with a question: Whether the answer’s last character is a question mark, reported as the share of responses that do. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 2%.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Exclamations · Artificial Analysis0.02 exclamations/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

0.02 exclamations/response · raw 0.02 exclamations/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Exclamations: Exclamation marks. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 0.02.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Headings · Artificial Analysis3.51 headings/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

3.51 headings/response · raw 3.51 headings/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Headings: Headings of any level. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 3.51.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Italics · Artificial Analysis0.56 italic spans/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

0.56 italic spans/response · raw 0.56 italic spans/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Italics: Uses of italics: each unbroken run of italic text counts once, so a single italicized word and a fully italicized sentence both count as 1. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 0.56.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Lists · Artificial Analysis3.04 lists/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

3.04 lists/response · raw 3.04 lists/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Lists: Top-level bulleted or numbered lists; nested sub-lists do not count separately. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 3.04.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Paragraphs · Artificial Analysis11.10 paragraphs/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

11.10 paragraphs/response · raw 11.1 paragraphs/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Paragraphs: Paragraphs of prose; headings, code and the items of a single-spaced list do not count. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 11.1.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Parentheses · Artificial Analysis0.47 parenthesis pairs/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

0.47 parenthesis pairs/response · raw 0.47 parenthesis pairs/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Parentheses: Closed pairs of parentheses, nested pairs included; unmatched parentheses do not count. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 0.47.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Questions · Artificial Analysis2.05 question marks/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

2.05 question marks/response · raw 2.05 question marks/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Questions: Question marks. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 2.05.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Quotes · Artificial Analysis7.74 quotation marks/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

7.74 quotation marks/response · raw 7.74 quotation marks/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Quotes: Quotation marks of any style, such as straight, curly, « » and „ “; apostrophes do not count. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 7.74.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Sentences · Artificial Analysis33.10 sentences/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

33.10 sentences/response · raw 33.1 sentences/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Sentences: Sentences found by a rule-based splitter that handles abbreviations such as “Dr.”. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 33.1.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Tables · Artificial Analysis0.22 tables/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

0.22 tables/response · raw 0.22 tables/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Tables: Tables. Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 0.22.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-PersonalityBench Oct2026 · Communication · Words · Artificial Analysis484 words/responseunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

484 words/response · raw 484 words/response

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Public rendered chart labels manually captured by the root agent, then transcribed once from those captures. Published 19 October 2026; source checked 20 October 2026; execution dates unpublished. No system prompt: one response to each of 900 English questions, 30 questions per each of 30 traits. This describes default communication style and trait prominence, not objective answer quality or accuracy. No AA API, internal app-state access, automated collector, paid export or inference was used. Programmatically measured Words: Tokens that contain a letter or digit; each Chinese, Japanese or Korean character counts as one word (but all questions are in English). Source-native average over responses to the same900questions; heatmap colors use pool-relative percentiles, but the visible cell numbers here are native quantities, not those color percentiles. The Characters definition explicitly removes code and URLs; exact feature-specific handling follows the methodology. Average sentence length is words per sentence, not per response. Ends with a question is the share of responses (%); bold/italic count spans, not words or characters. Descriptive communication style, not a quality ranking. Source label: 484.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-personalitybench
AA-Briefcase v1.1 Elo · Artificial Analysis1474unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

1474 · raw 1474 Elo

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: Artificial Analysis published model evaluation. Native combined analytical-quality, presentation and rubric Elo; separate from old unversioned AA-Briefcase records. Manually checked rendered chart/summary, not an API import. Displayed rounding is preserved; no hidden precision, confidence interval, inference date or weight SHA is inferred. Source says reasoning enabled but does not publish an effort label. Promised weights remain unavailable; no license/size is inferred.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/minimax-m3-1-flash
AA-Briefcase v1.1 rubric pass rate · Artificial Analysis47.8%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

47.8% · raw 47.8 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: Artificial Analysis published model evaluation. Task-level binary rubric pass rate; separate from analytical/presentation preference Elo. Manually checked rendered chart/summary, not an API import. Displayed rounding is preserved; no hidden precision, confidence interval, inference date or weight SHA is inferred. Source says reasoning enabled but does not publish an effort label. Promised weights remain unavailable; no license/size is inferred.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/minimax-m3-1-flash
AA-Briefcase v1.1 analytical quality Elo · Artificial Analysis1652unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

1652 · raw 1652 Elo

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: Artificial Analysis published model evaluation. Analytical quality preference Elo, separate from presentation and combined Elo. Manually checked rendered chart/summary, not an API import. Displayed rounding is preserved; no hidden precision, confidence interval, inference date or weight SHA is inferred. Source says reasoning enabled but does not publish an effort label. Promised weights remain unavailable; no license/size is inferred.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/minimax-m3-1-flash
AA-Briefcase v1.1 presentation Elo · Artificial Analysis1425unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

1425 · raw 1425 Elo

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: Artificial Analysis published model evaluation. Presentation preference Elo, separate from analytical quality and combined Elo. Manually checked rendered chart/summary, not an API import. Displayed rounding is preserved; no hidden precision, confidence interval, inference date or weight SHA is inferred. Source says reasoning enabled but does not publish an effort label. Promised weights remain unavailable; no license/size is inferred.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/minimax-m3-1-flash
AA-Omniscience Index · Artificial Analysis16unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

16 · raw 16 index

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: Artificial Analysis published model evaluation. Signed knowledge reliability index, not percent accuracy; correct answers rewarded and hallucinations penalized. Rounded public chart observation. Manually checked rendered chart/summary, not an API import. Displayed rounding is preserved; no hidden precision, confidence interval, inference date or weight SHA is inferred. Source says reasoning enabled but does not publish an effort label. Promised weights remain unavailable; no license/size is inferred.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/minimax-m3-1-flash
AA-Omniscience accuracy · Artificial Analysis56%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

56% · raw 56 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: Artificial Analysis published model evaluation. Share of all questions answered correctly in AA’s own knowledge evaluation. Rounded public chart label, not the vendor’s public-set test. Manually checked rendered chart/summary, not an API import. Displayed rounding is preserved; no hidden precision, confidence interval, inference date or weight SHA is inferred. Source says reasoning enabled but does not publish an effort label. Promised weights remain unavailable; no license/size is inferred.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/minimax-m3-1-flash
AA-Omniscience hallucination rate · Artificial Analysis93%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

93% · raw 93 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: Artificial Analysis published model evaluation. Incorrect / (incorrect + partial + not attempted), as defined by the source. Lower is better; not overall error fraction. Manually checked rendered chart/summary, not an API import. Displayed rounding is preserved; no hidden precision, confidence interval, inference date or weight SHA is inferred. Source says reasoning enabled but does not publish an effort label. Promised weights remain unavailable; no license/size is inferred.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/minimax-m3-1-flash
AutomationBench (AA) · Artificial Analysis73%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

73% · raw 73 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: Artificial Analysis published model evaluation. AA agentic SaaS workflow objective reward. Separate from a vendor’s strict all-assertion task pass rate. Manually checked rendered chart/summary, not an API import. Displayed rounding is preserved; no hidden precision, confidence interval, inference date or weight SHA is inferred. Source says reasoning enabled but does not publish an effort label. Promised weights remain unavailable; no license/size is inferred.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/minimax-m3-1-flash
Humanity's Last Exam (AA harness) · Artificial Analysis48%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

48% · raw 48 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: Artificial Analysis published model evaluation. AA’s published Humanity’s Last Exam observation; exact tools/population details are not restated on the captured model chart. Manually checked rendered chart/summary, not an API import. Displayed rounding is preserved; no hidden precision, confidence interval, inference date or weight SHA is inferred. Source says reasoning enabled but does not publish an effort label. Promised weights remain unavailable; no license/size is inferred.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/minimax-m3-1-flash
GDP.PDF (AA) · Artificial Analysis21%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

21% · raw 21 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: Artificial Analysis published model evaluation. AA professional-document reasoning all-pass rate. Distinct from GDPval work-product Elo. Manually checked rendered chart/summary, not an API import. Displayed rounding is preserved; no hidden precision, confidence interval, inference date or weight SHA is inferred. Source says reasoning enabled but does not publish an effort label. Promised weights remain unavailable; no license/size is inferred.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/minimax-m3-1-flash
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) · Artificial Analysis26%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

26% · raw 26 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: Artificial Analysis published model evaluation. AA’s Terminal-Bench4.0 model-plus-agent setup, separate from vendor harness observations. Manually checked rendered chart/summary, not an API import. Displayed rounding is preserved; no hidden precision, confidence interval, inference date or weight SHA is inferred. Source says reasoning enabled but does not publish an effort label. Promised weights remain unavailable; no license/size is inferred.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/minimax-m3-1-flash
AA-LCR v1.1 (AA) · Artificial Analysis80%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

80% · raw 80 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: Artificial Analysis published model evaluation. Version1.1 of AA long-context reasoning. Separate from old unversioned AA-LCR observations. Manually checked rendered chart/summary, not an API import. Displayed rounding is preserved; no hidden precision, confidence interval, inference date or weight SHA is inferred. Source says reasoning enabled but does not publish an effort label. Promised weights remain unavailable; no license/size is inferred.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/minimax-m3-1-flash
SciCode (AA) · Artificial Analysis53%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

53% · raw 53 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: Artificial Analysis published model evaluation. AA scientist-authored coding evaluation. Source currently labels this benchmark under review; preserve that uncertainty. Manually checked rendered chart/summary, not an API import. Displayed rounding is preserved; no hidden precision, confidence interval, inference date or weight SHA is inferred. Source says reasoning enabled but does not publish an effort label. Promised weights remain unavailable; no license/size is inferred.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/minimax-m3-1-flash
CritPt (AA) · Artificial Analysis22%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

22% · raw 22 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: Artificial Analysis published model evaluation. AA research-level physics evaluation. Source currently labels this benchmark under review; preserve that uncertainty. Manually checked rendered chart/summary, not an API import. Displayed rounding is preserved; no hidden precision, confidence interval, inference date or weight SHA is inferred. Source says reasoning enabled but does not publish an effort label. Promised weights remain unavailable; no license/size is inferred.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/minimax-m3-1-flash
MMMU-Pro (AA) · Artificial Analysis79%unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

79% · raw 79 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: Artificial Analysis published model evaluation. AA visual-reasoning observation for the exact named hosted model; serving precision, image pathway and execution date unpublished. Manually checked rendered chart/summary, not an API import. Displayed rounding is preserved; no hidden precision, confidence interval, inference date or weight SHA is inferred. Source says reasoning enabled but does not publish an effort label. Promised weights remain unavailable; no license/size is inferred.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/minimax-m3-1-flash
Intelligence Index · Artificial Analysis43unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

43 · raw 43 index

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: Artificial Analysis published model evaluation. AA Intelligence Index v4.3.2; public rounded summary. Exact measurement date and serving configuration remain unknown. Manually checked rendered chart/summary, not an API import. Displayed rounding is preserved; no hidden precision, confidence interval, inference date or weight SHA is inferred. Source says reasoning enabled but does not publish an effort label. Promised weights remain unavailable; no license/size is inferred.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/minimax-m3-1-flash
Output speed · Artificial Analysis120.1 tok/sunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

120.1 tok/s · raw 120.1 tok/s

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: Artificial Analysis published model evaluation. AA observed output speed, separate from OpenRouter endpoint measurements or vendor throughput. Manually checked rendered chart/summary, not an API import. Displayed rounding is preserved; no hidden precision, confidence interval, inference date or weight SHA is inferred. Source says reasoning enabled but does not publish an effort label. Promised weights remain unavailable; no license/size is inferred.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/minimax-m3-1-flash
Cost per Intelligence Index task · Artificial Analysis$0.22unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

$0.22 · raw 0.22 USD

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: Artificial Analysis published model evaluation. AA usage-priced task cost, not an API token tariff, invoice or subscription coefficient. Manually checked rendered chart/summary, not an API import. Displayed rounding is preserved; no hidden precision, confidence interval, inference date or weight SHA is inferred. Source says reasoning enabled but does not publish an effort label. Promised weights remain unavailable; no license/size is inferred.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/minimax-m3-1-flash
Output tokens from Intelligence Index (millions) · Artificial Analysis180 M tokensunknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

180 M tokens · raw 180 M tokens

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: Artificial Analysis published model evaluation. Source-rounded total output-token use for the AA Intelligence Index, in millions; not per-request output allowance. Manually checked rendered chart/summary, not an API import. Displayed rounding is preserved; no hidden precision, confidence interval, inference date or weight SHA is inferred. Source says reasoning enabled but does not publish an effort label. Promised weights remain unavailable; no license/size is inferred. Summary uses a source-rounded millions-of-output-tokens unit.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/minimax-m3-1-flash
AA Industry Index Oct2026 · Finance & Accounting · Artificial Analysis49unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

49 · raw 49 index

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: Artificial Analysis published model evaluation. Manual native chart observation, current source industry aggregate; no computed average or hidden precision inferred. Components: 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf. Displayed index is not percent task success; current snapshot remains separate from older unversioned industry observations.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/minimax-m3-1-flash
AA Industry Index Oct2026 · Strategy & Ops · Artificial Analysis55unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

55 · raw 55 index

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: Artificial Analysis published model evaluation. Manual native chart observation, current source industry aggregate; no computed average or hidden precision inferred. Components: 6 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf. Displayed index is not percent task success; current snapshot remains separate from older unversioned industry observations.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/minimax-m3-1-flash
AA Industry Index Oct2026 · Legal · Artificial Analysis47unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

47 · raw 47 index

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: Artificial Analysis published model evaluation. Manual native chart observation, current source industry aggregate; no computed average or hidden precision inferred. Components: 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA. Displayed index is not percent task success; current snapshot remains separate from older unversioned industry observations.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/minimax-m3-1-flash
AA Industry Index Oct2026 · Engineering · Artificial Analysis43unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

43 · raw 43 index

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: Artificial Analysis published model evaluation. Manual native chart observation, current source industry aggregate; no computed average or hidden precision inferred. Components: 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0. Displayed index is not percent task success; current snapshot remains separate from older unversioned industry observations.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/minimax-m3-1-flash
AA Industry Index Oct2026 · Economics · Artificial Analysis50unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

50 · raw 50 index

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Harness: Artificial Analysis published model evaluation. Manual native chart observation, current source industry aggregate; no computed average or hidden precision inferred. Components: 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-LCR v1.1. Displayed index is not percent task success; current snapshot remains separate from older unversioned industry observations.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/minimax-m3-1-flash
GDPval-AA v2.1 Elo · Artificial Analysis1458unknown effort
All 1 recorded result & sources

1458 · raw 1458 Elo

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-20

Manually observed public GDPval-AA v2.1 leaderboard table, full 298-configuration pool checked 20 October 2026. Exact source configuration: MiniMax-M3.1-Flash; creator: MiniMax; source rank 59; source release-month label Oct 2026 is model release metadata, not execution date. Published rounded native Elo 1458; literal displayed CI -20 / +20. Native Elo is not a percentage and is not the normalized (Elo−500)/2000 chart quantity. This versioned metric is separate from older generic GDPval-AA Elo and vendor GDPval/GDPval-AA results; no old evidence is overwritten. Execution date, inference precision, unprinted effort budgets and task costs are unpublished in this captured table. Elo is relative to the dated comparison pool; drift from an earlier observation does not prove a new evaluation run. Source does not label an effort; unknown is preserved rather than copying a vendor default. Headline: highest published native Elo for this exact approved model; tied values prefer existing featured effort then source order.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/gdpval-aa
ALE v1 Overall · Unlicensed · Pass Rate · Agents’ Last Exam (Berkeley RDI)31.2%max effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

31.2% · raw 31.20567375886525 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: claude_code; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Overall · Unlicensed. Perfect-score pass rate, not partial credit. Raw fraction converted to percent. 44 passes; 140 tasks with submissions out of 141 split tasks; 140 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard

28.4% · raw 28.368794326241137 %

Alternative · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: codex; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Overall · Unlicensed. Perfect-score pass rate, not partial credit. Raw fraction converted to percent. 40 passes; 137 tasks with submissions out of 141 split tasks; 137 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard
ALE v1 Overall · Unlicensed · Partial-credit Score · Agents’ Last Exam (Berkeley RDI)57%max effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

57% · raw 56.99078106759686 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: claude_code; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Overall · Unlicensed. Published average partial-credit score, not perfect-score pass rate. Raw fraction converted to percent. 44 passes; 140 tasks with submissions out of 141 split tasks; 140 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard

54.3% · raw 54.33797644719029 %

Alternative · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: codex; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Overall · Unlicensed. Published average partial-credit score, not perfect-score pass rate. Raw fraction converted to percent. 40 passes; 137 tasks with submissions out of 141 split tasks; 137 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard
ALE v1 Near-term · Unlicensed · Pass Rate · Agents’ Last Exam (Berkeley RDI)46.3%max effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

46.3% · raw 46.26865671641791 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: claude_code; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Near-term · Unlicensed. Perfect-score pass rate, not partial credit. Raw fraction converted to percent. 31 passes; 67 tasks with submissions out of 67 split tasks; 67 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard

40.3% · raw 40.298507462686565 %

Alternative · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: codex; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Near-term · Unlicensed. Perfect-score pass rate, not partial credit. Raw fraction converted to percent. 27 passes; 67 tasks with submissions out of 67 split tasks; 67 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard
ALE v1 Near-term · Unlicensed · Partial-credit Score · Agents’ Last Exam (Berkeley RDI)77.2%max effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

77.2% · raw 77.2285154161045 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: claude_code; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Near-term · Unlicensed. Published average partial-credit score, not perfect-score pass rate. Raw fraction converted to percent. 31 passes; 67 tasks with submissions out of 67 split tasks; 67 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard

73.3% · raw 73.33131926155338 %

Alternative · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: codex; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Near-term · Unlicensed. Published average partial-credit score, not perfect-score pass rate. Raw fraction converted to percent. 27 passes; 67 tasks with submissions out of 67 split tasks; 67 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard
ALE v1 Last-Exam · Unlicensed · Pass Rate · Agents’ Last Exam (Berkeley RDI)6.7%max effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

6.7% · raw 6.666666666666667 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: claude_code; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Last-Exam · Unlicensed. Perfect-score pass rate, not partial credit. Raw fraction converted to percent. 2 passes; 29 tasks with submissions out of 30 split tasks; 29 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard

3.3% · raw 3.3333333333333335 %

Alternative · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: codex; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Last-Exam · Unlicensed. Perfect-score pass rate, not partial credit. Raw fraction converted to percent. 1 passes; 27 tasks with submissions out of 30 split tasks; 27 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard
ALE v1 Last-Exam · Unlicensed · Partial-credit Score · Agents’ Last Exam (Berkeley RDI)20.7%max effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

20.7% · raw 20.65754794594124 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: claude_code; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Last-Exam · Unlicensed. Published average partial-credit score, not perfect-score pass rate. Raw fraction converted to percent. 2 passes; 29 tasks with submissions out of 30 split tasks; 29 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard

16.3% · raw 16.261682814635485 %

Alternative · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: codex; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Last-Exam · Unlicensed. Published average partial-credit score, not perfect-score pass rate. Raw fraction converted to percent. 1 passes; 27 tasks with submissions out of 30 split tasks; 27 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard
ALE v1 Full-Spectrum · Unlicensed · Pass Rate · Agents’ Last Exam (Berkeley RDI)26%max effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

26% · raw 26 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: codex; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Full-Spectrum · Unlicensed. Perfect-score pass rate, not partial credit. Raw fraction converted to percent. 13 passes; 48 tasks with submissions out of 50 split tasks; 48 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard

24% · raw 24 %

Alternative · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: claude_code; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Full-Spectrum · Unlicensed. Perfect-score pass rate, not partial credit. Raw fraction converted to percent. 12 passes; 50 tasks with submissions out of 50 split tasks; 50 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard
ALE v1 Full-Spectrum · Unlicensed · Partial-credit Score · Agents’ Last Exam (Berkeley RDI)48.6%max effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

48.6% · raw 48.552116081813764 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: codex; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Full-Spectrum · Unlicensed. Published average partial-credit score, not perfect-score pass rate. Raw fraction converted to percent. 13 passes; 48 tasks with submissions out of 50 split tasks; 48 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard

49.5% · raw 49.4692479090425 %

Alternative · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: claude_code; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Full-Spectrum · Unlicensed. Published average partial-credit score, not perfect-score pass rate. Raw fraction converted to percent. 12 passes; 50 tasks with submissions out of 50 split tasks; 50 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard
ALE v1 ALE-CLI · Full · Pass Rate · Agents’ Last Exam (Berkeley RDI)26.7%max effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

26.7% · raw 26.666666666666668 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: claude_code; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 ALE-CLI · Full. Perfect-score pass rate, not partial credit. Raw fraction converted to percent. 28 passes; 104 tasks with submissions out of 105 split tasks; 104 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard

25.7% · raw 25.71428571428571 %

Alternative · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: codex; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 ALE-CLI · Full. Perfect-score pass rate, not partial credit. Raw fraction converted to percent. 27 passes; 102 tasks with submissions out of 105 split tasks; 102 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard
ALE v1 ALE-CLI · Full · Partial-credit Score · Agents’ Last Exam (Berkeley RDI)53.9%max effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

53.9% · raw 53.91510889246521 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: claude_code; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 ALE-CLI · Full. Published average partial-credit score, not perfect-score pass rate. Raw fraction converted to percent. 28 passes; 104 tasks with submissions out of 105 split tasks; 104 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard

53% · raw 53.0244505351067 %

Alternative · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: codex; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 ALE-CLI · Full. Published average partial-credit score, not perfect-score pass rate. Raw fraction converted to percent. 27 passes; 102 tasks with submissions out of 105 split tasks; 102 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard
ALE v1 Overall · Full · Pass Rate · Agents’ Last Exam (Berkeley RDI)29.6%max effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

29.6% · raw 29.605263157894733 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: claude_code; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Overall · Full. Perfect-score pass rate, not partial credit. Raw fraction converted to percent. 45 passes; 149 tasks with submissions out of 152 split tasks; 149 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard

27% · raw 26.973684210526315 %

Alternative · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: codex; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Overall · Full. Perfect-score pass rate, not partial credit. Raw fraction converted to percent. 41 passes; 147 tasks with submissions out of 152 split tasks; 147 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard
ALE v1 Overall · Full · Partial-credit Score · Agents’ Last Exam (Berkeley RDI)55%max effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

55% · raw 54.95140832888198 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: claude_code; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Overall · Full. Published average partial-credit score, not perfect-score pass rate. Raw fraction converted to percent. 45 passes; 149 tasks with submissions out of 152 split tasks; 149 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard

52.9% · raw 52.927944585323175 %

Alternative · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: codex; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Overall · Full. Published average partial-credit score, not perfect-score pass rate. Raw fraction converted to percent. 41 passes; 147 tasks with submissions out of 152 split tasks; 147 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard
ALE v1 Near-term · Full · Pass Rate · Agents’ Last Exam (Berkeley RDI)46.3%max effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

46.3% · raw 46.26865671641791 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: claude_code; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Near-term · Full. Perfect-score pass rate, not partial credit. Raw fraction converted to percent. 31 passes; 67 tasks with submissions out of 67 split tasks; 67 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard

40.3% · raw 40.298507462686565 %

Alternative · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: codex; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Near-term · Full. Perfect-score pass rate, not partial credit. Raw fraction converted to percent. 27 passes; 67 tasks with submissions out of 67 split tasks; 67 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard
ALE v1 Near-term · Full · Partial-credit Score · Agents’ Last Exam (Berkeley RDI)77.2%max effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

77.2% · raw 77.2285154161045 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: claude_code; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Near-term · Full. Published average partial-credit score, not perfect-score pass rate. Raw fraction converted to percent. 31 passes; 67 tasks with submissions out of 67 split tasks; 67 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard

73.3% · raw 73.33131926155338 %

Alternative · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: codex; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Near-term · Full. Published average partial-credit score, not perfect-score pass rate. Raw fraction converted to percent. 27 passes; 67 tasks with submissions out of 67 split tasks; 67 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard
ALE v1 Last-Exam · Full · Pass Rate · Agents’ Last Exam (Berkeley RDI)5.3%max effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

5.3% · raw 5.263157894736842 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: claude_code; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Last-Exam · Full. Perfect-score pass rate, not partial credit. Raw fraction converted to percent. 2 passes; 35 tasks with submissions out of 38 split tasks; 35 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard

5.3% · raw 5.263157894736842 %

Alternative · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: codex; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Last-Exam · Full. Perfect-score pass rate, not partial credit. Raw fraction converted to percent. 2 passes; 34 tasks with submissions out of 38 split tasks; 34 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard
ALE v1 Last-Exam · Full · Partial-credit Score · Agents’ Last Exam (Berkeley RDI)19.7%max effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

19.7% · raw 19.7010624693984 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: claude_code; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Last-Exam · Full. Published average partial-credit score, not perfect-score pass rate. Raw fraction converted to percent. 2 passes; 35 tasks with submissions out of 38 split tasks; 35 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard

18% · raw 18.032720588272515 %

Alternative · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: codex; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Last-Exam · Full. Published average partial-credit score, not perfect-score pass rate. Raw fraction converted to percent. 2 passes; 34 tasks with submissions out of 38 split tasks; 34 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard
ALE v1 Full-Spectrum · Full · Pass Rate · Agents’ Last Exam (Berkeley RDI)25.5%max effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

25.5% · raw 25.454545454545453 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: claude_code; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Full-Spectrum · Full. Perfect-score pass rate, not partial credit. Raw fraction converted to percent. 14 passes; 55 tasks with submissions out of 55 split tasks; 55 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard

25.5% · raw 25.454545454545453 %

Alternative · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: codex; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Full-Spectrum · Full. Perfect-score pass rate, not partial credit. Raw fraction converted to percent. 14 passes; 53 tasks with submissions out of 55 split tasks; 53 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard
ALE v1 Full-Spectrum · Full · Partial-credit Score · Agents’ Last Exam (Berkeley RDI)50.2%max effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

50.2% · raw 50.20840719003864 %

Headline · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: claude_code; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Full-Spectrum · Full. Published average partial-credit score, not perfect-score pass rate. Raw fraction converted to percent. 14 passes; 55 tasks with submissions out of 55 split tasks; 55 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard

49.3% · raw 49.33828734710342 %

Alternative · max effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-10-19

Harness: codex; API variant reasoning-max; board effort label max. ALE-v1 Full-Spectrum · Full. Published average partial-credit score, not perfect-score pass rate. Raw fraction converted to percent. 14 passes; 53 tasks with submissions out of 55 split tasks; 53 runs. Missing submissions do not prove a different task population. The publisher default configuration ranks pass rate, then partial score, coverage and effort; both headline metrics share it. Different agents/efforts remain separate alternatives. Runtime totals exclude queue/setup/grading/sync. No executed weight SHA or run date published; source check is 2026-10-19. MiniMax total costs are hidden by the public board; API DB amounts are not imported.

https://agents-last-exam.org/leaderboard

Read how we select and source scores or the comparison guide.