Examenos

Official, independent and pricing data

Model profilesv c917915

Inkling 2 Small

Explore Inkling 2 Small from Thinking Machines: published specifications, source-linked vendor benchmarks, independent evaluator coverage and recorded pricing when available.

Compare Inkling 2 Small with other models →Compare subscription plansExplore data coverage

Pricing · OpenRouter

No OpenRouter pricing is recorded for this model. Missing rates are not free.

Official / vendor benchmarks

Default headline records. Own-vendor, peer-vendor and third-party provenance remain visible in evidence; configurations may differ.

Official / vendor headline scores; expand evidence for every record
Benchmark / evaluatorHeadline scoreEvidence
AA Intelligence Index v5.0 (vendor-cited)30.6xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

30.6 · raw 30.6 index

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “AA Index (v5.0)”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “30.6”. Thinking Machines states it uses Artificial Analysis’s reported score for this benchmark, for its own and other models; not an Artificial Analysis record captured by Examenos. Index value, not a percentage. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
Vals Index (vendor reports)56.1%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

56.1% · raw 56.1 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “Vals Index (v2.2)”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “56.1%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Vals AI’s reported score for this benchmark; Vals’ own rows are stored separately under the Vals evaluator. Vals Index v2.2. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
FrontierCode 2.025.4%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

25.4% · raw 25.4 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “FrontierCode v2.0”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “25.4%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Artificial Analysis’s reported score for this benchmark, for its own and other models; not an Artificial Analysis record captured by Examenos. Artificial Analysis’s run of Cognition’s FrontierCode 2.0; Cognition’s own board has no Inkling 2 Small entry at the check. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
DeepSWE v1.172.1%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

72.1% · raw 72.1 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “DeepSWE v1.1”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “72.1%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Datacurve’s reported score. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 (AA, vendor-cited)5.7%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

5.7% · raw 5.7 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “Terminal Bench Science v0.1”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “5.7%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Artificial Analysis’s reported score for this benchmark, for its own and other models; not an Artificial Analysis record captured by Examenos. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
Vibe Code Bench (version unspecified, vendor reports)81.6%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

81.6% · raw 81.6 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “Vibe Code Bench v1.1”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “81.6%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Vals AI’s reported score for this benchmark; Vals’ own rows are stored separately under the Vals evaluator. Version 1.1. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
SWE-bench Pro v2-Hard86.3%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

86.3% · raw 86.3 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “SWEBench Pro v2 (Hard)”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “86.3%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Scale AI’s reported score for this benchmark. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
BioMysteryBench70%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

70% · raw 70 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “BioMysteryBench”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “70.0%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Vals AI’s reported score for this benchmark; Vals’ own rows are stored separately under the Vals evaluator. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
MCP Atlas85.4%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

85.4% · raw 85.4 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “MCP AtlasFull / Public”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “85.4/85.0%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Scale AI’s reported score for this benchmark. Full set (first value of “Full / Public”). Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
MCP Atlas (public split, Scale-cited)85%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

85% · raw 85 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “MCP AtlasFull / Public”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “85.4/85.0%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Scale AI’s reported score for this benchmark. Public split (second value of “Full / Public”). Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
AA-Briefcase v1.1 (vendor reports)1527xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

1527 · raw 1527 Elo

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “AA-Briefcase v1.1”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “1527”. Thinking Machines states it uses Artificial Analysis’s reported score for this benchmark, for its own and other models; not an Artificial Analysis record captured by Examenos. Elo-style rating. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
GDPval-AA v2.1 (vendor reports)1630xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

1630 · raw 1630 Elo

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “GDPVal-AA v2.1”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “1630”. Thinking Machines states it uses Artificial Analysis’s reported score for this benchmark, for its own and other models; not an Artificial Analysis record captured by Examenos. Elo-style rating. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
JobBench70.5%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

70.5% · raw 70.5 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “JobBench”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “70.5%”. Harness unpublished. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
τ³-bench Banking40.4%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

40.4% · raw 40.4 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “Tau 3 Banking v1.0.1”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “40.4%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Artificial Analysis’s reported score for this benchmark, for its own and other models; not an Artificial Analysis record captured by Examenos. τ³-bench Banking v1.0.1. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
Harvey Legal Agent (Vals harness, vendor reports)21.7%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

21.7% · raw 21.7 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “Harvey LAB v1.1”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “21.7%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Vals AI’s reported score for this benchmark; Vals’ own rows are stored separately under the Vals evaluator. The post names Vals’ HLAB-Vals-1.1 as the source. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
Legal Research Bench46.6%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

46.6% · raw 46.6 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “Legal Research Bench”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “46.6%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Vals AI’s reported score for this benchmark; Vals’ own rows are stored separately under the Vals evaluator. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
PerceptionBench64.7%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

64.7% · raw 64.7 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “PerceptionBench”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “64.7%”. Harness unpublished. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
ScreenSpot-Pro83.8%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

83.8% · raw 83.8 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “ScreenSpot Prooriginal / with Python”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “83.8/91.5%”. Original setting without tools (first value of “original / with Python”). Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
BabyVision68.6%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

68.6% · raw 68.6 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “BabyVisionoriginal / with Python”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “68.6/93.7%”. Original setting (first value of “original / with Python”). Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
BabyVision (with tools)93.7%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

93.7% · raw 93.7 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “BabyVisionoriginal / with Python”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “68.6/93.7%”. With a Python tool (second value of “original / with Python”). Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
GDP.PDF (vendor reports)25.2%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

25.2% · raw 25.2 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “GDP.pdf”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “25.2%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Artificial Analysis’s reported score for this benchmark, for its own and other models; not an Artificial Analysis record captured by Examenos. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
MMMU Pro (no tools)81.6%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

81.6% · raw 81.6 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “MMMU Pro (Standard 10)”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “81.6%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Artificial Analysis’s reported score for this benchmark, for its own and other models; not an Artificial Analysis record captured by Examenos. Standard setting with 10 options. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
CharXiv (RQ split)85.6%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

85.6% · raw 85.6 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “Charxiv RQoriginal / with Python”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “85.6/87.7%”. No tools (first value of “original / with Python”). Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
CharXiv RQ with Python (Thinking Machines)87.7%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

87.7% · raw 87.7 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “Charxiv RQoriginal / with Python”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “85.6/87.7%”. With a Python tool (second value). Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
Chartography36.7%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

36.7% · raw 36.7 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “Chartographyoriginal / with Python”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “36.7/80.4%”. No tools (first value of “original / with Python”). Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
Chartography (with tools)80.4%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

80.4% · raw 80.4 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “Chartographyoriginal / with Python”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “36.7/80.4%”. With a Python tool (second value). Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
AA-LCR v1.183.3%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

83.3% · raw 83.3 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “AA-LCR v1.1”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “83.3%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Artificial Analysis’s reported score for this benchmark, for its own and other models; not an Artificial Analysis record captured by Examenos. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
LongBench v270.6%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

70.6% · raw 70.6 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “LongBench v2”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “70.6%”. Harness unpublished. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
AA-Omniscience Index (vendor-cited)16.1xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

16.1 · raw 16.1 index

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “AA-Omniscience v1.1score”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “16.1”. Thinking Machines states it uses Artificial Analysis’s reported score for this benchmark, for its own and other models; not an Artificial Analysis record captured by Examenos. Omniscience v1.1 index (−100 to 100), not an accuracy. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
FORTRESS Adversarial (Thinking Machines; higher is better)83.8%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

83.8% · raw 83.8 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “FORTRESS (adversarial)”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “83.8%”. Higher is better: the rate of refusing harmful requests. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
FORTRESS Benign (Thinking Machines; higher is better)79.7%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

79.7% · raw 79.7 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “FORTRESS (benign)”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “79.7%”. Higher is better: the rate of still answering safe look-alike requests. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
StrongREJECT (Thinking Machines; higher is better)97.1%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

97.1% · raw 97.1 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “StrongREJECT (none)”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “97.1%”. Higher is better; “none” jailbreak setting as labelled. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA, vendor-cited)13.1%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

13.1% · raw 13.1 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “Terminal Bench v4.0”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “13.1%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Artificial Analysis’s reported score for this benchmark, for its own and other models; not an Artificial Analysis record captured by Examenos. The post attributes Terminal-Bench v4.0 to Artificial Analysis (Vals’ own Terminal-Bench 4.0 run shows 12.626, a different value). Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/model-card/inkling-2-small/
Terminal-Bench 2.185.1%xhigh effort
All 2 recorded results & sources

85.1% · raw 85.1 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “Terminal Bench 2.1Inkling 2 Small: Pi harness”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “85.1%”. Inkling 2 Small run in the Pi harness, as the row label states. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/model-card/inkling-2-small/

81.3% · raw 81.3 %

Alternative · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “Terminal Bench v2.1 (Terminus)”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “81.3%”. Terminus harness; kept as an alternative to the Pi-harness row, which is the headline. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/model-card/inkling-2-small/
SWE-Marathon v1.138.8%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

38.8% · raw 38.8 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “SWE-Marathon v1.1”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “38.8%”. Harness unpublished. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/model-card/inkling-2-small/
SWE-bench Multilingual81.2%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

81.2% · raw 81.2 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “SWEBench Multilingual”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “81.2%”. Harness unpublished. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/model-card/inkling-2-small/
SWE-bench Verified82.2%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

82.2% · raw 82.2 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “SWEBench Verified”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “82.2%”. Harness unpublished. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/model-card/inkling-2-small/
BrowseComp90.2%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

90.2% · raw 90.2 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “BrowseCompwith context management”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “90.2%”. With context management; harness unpublished. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/model-card/inkling-2-small/
DeepSearchQA90.9%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

90.9% · raw 90.9 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “DeepSearchQA”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “90.9%”. Harness unpublished. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/model-card/inkling-2-small/
Humanity's Last Exam (text-only, no tools)44.1%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

44.1% · raw 44.1 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “HLE (text only)”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “44.1%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Artificial Analysis’s reported score for this benchmark, for its own and other models; not an Artificial Analysis record captured by Examenos. Text-only. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/model-card/inkling-2-small/
GPQA Diamond93%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

93% · raw 93 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “GPQA Diamond”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “93.0%”. Sampling and repeats unpublished. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/model-card/inkling-2-small/
HMMT February 202695.8%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

95.8% · raw 95.8 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “HMMT Feb 2026”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “95.8%”. Sampling and repeats unpublished. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/model-card/inkling-2-small/
MathVision92.8%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

92.8% · raw 92.8 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “MathVision”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “92.8%”. Split unpublished. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/model-card/inkling-2-small/
AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination73.3%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

73.3% · raw 73.3 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “AA-Omniscience v1.1non-hallucination rate”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “73.3%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Artificial Analysis’s reported score for this benchmark, for its own and other models; not an Artificial Analysis record captured by Examenos. Omniscience v1.1 non-hallucination rate (1 − hallucination rate). Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/
AutomationBench v1.0.645.6%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

45.6% · raw 45.6 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor

Source/record date: 2026-11-05

Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “AutomationBench v1.0.6”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “45.6%”. Version 1.0.6 as labelled; harness unpublished. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot.

https://thinkingmachines.ai/model-card/inkling-2-small/

Independent evaluators

Evaluator harnesses are distinct from vendor measurements. Missing coverage is not a failed test.

Independent evaluator headline scores; expand evidence for every record
Benchmark / evaluatorHeadline scoreEvidence
ARC-AGI-1 · ARC Prize96.5%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

96.5% · raw 96.5 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: Verified Semi-Private. Exact ARC-AGI-1 Semi-Private source configuration thinky-inkling-2-small-xhigh (“Inkling 2 Small (XHigh)”). Raw source fraction ×100; source artifact generation is not an execution date. ARC Prize lists one configuration, labelled XHigh. Published cost is workload evidence, not token tariff.

https://arcprize.org/results/thinky-inkling-2-small
ARC-AGI-2 · ARC Prize81.7%xhigh effort
The recorded result & source

81.7% · raw 81.6667 %

Headline · xhigh effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: Verified Semi-Private. Exact ARC-AGI-2 Semi-Private source configuration thinky-inkling-2-small-xhigh (“Inkling 2 Small (XHigh)”). Raw source fraction ×100; source artifact generation is not an execution date. ARC Prize lists one configuration, labelled XHigh. Published cost is workload evidence, not token tariff.

https://arcprize.org/results/thinky-inkling-2-small
Intelligence Index v5.0.1 · Artificial Analysis31unknown effort
The recorded result & source

31 · raw 31 index

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Manual observation of Artificial Analysis’s public Intelligence Index v5.0.1 evaluation page, “Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: Score” chart, 7 November 2026 (selection inkling-2-small, inkling-small, inkling; research_notes/Model and benchmark news November 7/captures/aa-index-browser.json). Configuration “Inkling 2 Small” (slug inkling-2-small); AA’s label states no reasoning effort. The same reading shows Inkling Small 13 and Inkling (xhigh) 12, equal to the stored rows. AA’s 5 November changelog reports the same 31. AA’s displayed rounding; no API, download, hidden precision or inferred run date.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/artificial-analysis-intelligence-index
MCP Atlas · Task pass rate · MCP Atlas (Scale Labs)85.4%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

85.4% · raw 85.4 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: Scale MCP Atlas updated April 2026 method, maximum 100 tool calls/task, transient-error retry, updated LLM judge. Exact visible “Inkling Small 2” pass rate 85.40%, 95% interval half-width 2.20 percentage points, marked NEW, rank 9. The board label “Inkling Small 2” is Inkling 2 Small: Thinking Machines’ 5 November post cites Scale’s MCP Atlas full-set value 85.4 for Inkling 2 Small. No effort label shown. Footer update date does not establish execution date.

https://labs.scale.com/leaderboard/mcp_atlas
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Vals AI69.504%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

69.504% · raw 69.504 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Cost per task · Vals AI$0.529753/taskunknown effort
The recorded result & source

$0.529753/task · raw 0.529753 USD/task

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Task latency · Vals AI833.925 sunknown effort
The recorded result & source

833.925 s · raw 833.925 s

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Template · Vals AI71.595%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

71.595% · raw 71.595 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Scratch · Vals AI67.086%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

67.086% · raw 67.086 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · LBO · Vals AI55.861%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

55.861% · raw 55.861 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · DCF · Vals AI62.222%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

62.222% · raw 62.222 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · M&A · Vals AI73.659%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

73.659% · raw 73.659 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Operating · Vals AI69.976%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

69.976% · raw 69.976 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Comps · Vals AI73.120%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

73.120% · raw 73.12 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Dataroom · Vals AI83.423%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

83.423% · raw 83.423 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Misc · Vals AI68.264%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

68.264% · raw 68.264 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1
Vals Finance Index v1 · Vals AI61.470%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

61.470% · raw 61.47 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/finance_index
Vals Finance Index v1 · Cost per task · Vals AI$0.283293/taskunknown effort
The recorded result & source

$0.283293/task · raw 0.283293 USD/task

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/finance_index
Vals Finance Index v1 · Task latency · Vals AI514.765 sunknown effort
The recorded result & source

514.765 s · raw 514.765 s

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/finance_index
Vals Finance Index v1 · Finance Agent v2.1 · Vals AI67.536%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

67.536% · raw 67.536 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/finance_index
Vals Finance Index v1 · EMB v1.1 · Vals AI69.504%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

69.504% · raw 69.504 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/finance_index
Vals Finance Index v1 · Tax Agent all-pass accuracy · Vals AI38.909%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

38.909% · raw 38.909 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/finance_index
Finance Agent v2.1 · Vals AI67.536%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

67.536% · raw 67.536 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1
Finance Agent v2.1 · Cost per task · Vals AI$0.175784/taskunknown effort
The recorded result & source

$0.175784/task · raw 0.175784 USD/task

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1
Finance Agent v2.1 · Task latency · Vals AI296.329 sunknown effort
The recorded result & source

296.329 s · raw 296.329 s

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1
Finance Agent v2.1 · All-Pass Accuracy · Vals AI56.585%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

56.585% · raw 56.585 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1
Finance Agent v2.1 · General Qualitative Analysis · Vals AI78.029%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

78.029% · raw 78.029 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1
Finance Agent v2.1 · General Quantitative Analysis · Vals AI79.183%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

79.183% · raw 79.183 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1
Finance Agent v2.1 · Market Analysis · Vals AI58.988%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

58.988% · raw 58.988 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1
Finance Agent v2.1 · Comparables · Vals AI64.990%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

64.990% · raw 64.99 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1
Finance Agent v2.1 · Precedents · Vals AI47.091%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

47.091% · raw 47.091 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1
Finance Agent v2.1 · Adjustments · Vals AI67.402%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

67.402% · raw 67.402 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1
Finance Agent v2.1 · Earnings Analysis · Vals AI88.936%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

88.936% · raw 88.936 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1
Finance Agent v2.1 · Disclosure Analysis · Vals AI80.792%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

80.792% · raw 80.792 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1
Finance Agent v2.1 · Financial Modeling · Vals AI42.417%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

42.417% · raw 42.417 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Vals AI21.667%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

21.667% · raw 21.667 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Cost per task · Vals AI$1.234911/taskunknown effort
The recorded result & source

$1.234911/task · raw 1.234911 USD/task

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task latency · Vals AI1290.908 sunknown effort
The recorded result & source

1290.908 s · raw 1290.908 s

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Antitrust Competition · Vals AI40.000%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

40.000% · raw 40 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Arbitration International Dispute Resolution · Vals AI30.000%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

30.000% · raw 30 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Banking Finance · Vals AI10.000%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

10.000% · raw 10 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Bankruptcy Restructuring · Vals AI20.000%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

20.000% · raw 20 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Capital Markets · Vals AI20.000%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

20.000% · raw 20 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Corporate Governance · Vals AI30.000%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

30.000% · raw 30 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Corporate Ma · Vals AI20.000%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

20.000% · raw 20 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Data Privacy Cybersecurity · Vals AI20.000%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

20.000% · raw 20 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Emerging Companies Venture Capital · Vals AI20.000%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

20.000% · raw 20 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Employment Labor · Vals AI0.000%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

0.000% · raw 0 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Energy Natural Resources · Vals AI50.000%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

50.000% · raw 50 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Environmental Esg · Vals AI0.000%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

0.000% · raw 0 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Funds Asset Management · Vals AI30.000%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

30.000% · raw 30 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Healthcare Life Sciences · Vals AI30.000%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

30.000% · raw 30 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Immigration · Vals AI30.000%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

30.000% · raw 30 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Insurance · Vals AI0.000%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

0.000% · raw 0 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Intellectual Property · Vals AI20.000%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

20.000% · raw 20 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · International Trade Sanctions · Vals AI20.000%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

20.000% · raw 20 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Litigation Dispute Resolution · Vals AI40.000%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

40.000% · raw 40 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Real Estate · Vals AI30.000%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

30.000% · raw 30 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Structured Finance Securitization · Vals AI20.000%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

20.000% · raw 20 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Tax · Vals AI20.000%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

20.000% · raw 20 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Trusts Estates Private Client · Vals AI20.000%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

20.000% · raw 20 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · White Collar Defense Investigations · Vals AI0.000%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

0.000% · raw 0 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Vals AI93.717%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

93.717% · raw 93.717 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Antitrust Competition · Vals AI95.471%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

95.471% · raw 95.471 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Arbitration International Dispute Resolution · Vals AI94.803%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

94.803% · raw 94.803 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Banking Finance · Vals AI95.522%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

95.522% · raw 95.522 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Bankruptcy Restructuring · Vals AI92.215%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

92.215% · raw 92.215 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Capital Markets · Vals AI94.706%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

94.706% · raw 94.706 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Corporate Governance · Vals AI96.404%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

96.404% · raw 96.404 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Corporate Ma · Vals AI96.463%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

96.463% · raw 96.463 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Data Privacy Cybersecurity · Vals AI96.820%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

96.820% · raw 96.82 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Emerging Companies Venture Capital · Vals AI96.587%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

96.587% · raw 96.587 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Employment Labor · Vals AI92.509%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

92.509% · raw 92.509 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Energy Natural Resources · Vals AI98.185%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

98.185% · raw 98.185 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Environmental Esg · Vals AI92.652%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

92.652% · raw 92.652 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Funds Asset Management · Vals AI93.003%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

93.003% · raw 93.003 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Healthcare Life Sciences · Vals AI94.799%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

94.799% · raw 94.799 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Immigration · Vals AI92.364%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

92.364% · raw 92.364 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Insurance · Vals AI91.176%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

91.176% · raw 91.176 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Intellectual Property · Vals AI96.619%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

96.619% · raw 96.619 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · International Trade Sanctions · Vals AI95.618%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

95.618% · raw 95.618 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Litigation Dispute Resolution · Vals AI95.677%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

95.677% · raw 95.677 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Real Estate · Vals AI94.752%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

94.752% · raw 94.752 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Structured Finance Securitization · Vals AI93.387%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

93.387% · raw 93.387 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Tax · Vals AI93.144%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

93.144% · raw 93.144 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Trusts Estates Private Client · Vals AI96.183%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

96.183% · raw 96.183 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · White Collar Defense Investigations · Vals AI71.044%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

71.044% · raw 71.044 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab
Vals Index v2.2 · Vals AI56.081%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

56.081% · raw 56.081 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index
Vals Index v2.2 · Cost per task · Vals AI$3.509318/taskunknown effort
The recorded result & source

$3.509318/task · raw 3.509318 USD/task

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index
Vals Index v2.2 · Task latency · Vals AI3034.529 sunknown effort
The recorded result & source

3034.529 s · raw 3034.529 s

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index
Vals Index v2.2 · Vibe Code Bench v1.1 · Vals AI81.546%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

81.546% · raw 81.546 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: OpenHands. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index
Vals Index v2.2 · Finance Agent v2.1 · Vals AI67.536%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

67.536% · raw 67.536 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index
Vals Index v2.2 · EMB v1.1 · Vals AI69.504%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

69.504% · raw 69.504 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index
Vals Index v2.2 · Code Migration v1.1 (index subset 50 CLI + 10 COBOL) · Vals AI39.457%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

39.457% · raw 39.457 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Index Code Migration is the 60-task subset (50 CLI + 10 COBOL), not standalone Migration.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index
Vals Index v2.2 · Legal Research · Vals AI46.635%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

46.635% · raw 46.635 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index
Vals Index v2.2 · HLAB v1.1 · Vals AI21.667%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

21.667% · raw 21.667 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index
Vals Index v2.2 · Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Vals AI12.626%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

12.626% · raw 12.626 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-10

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index
Vals Index v2.2 · Tax Agent · Vals AI38.909%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

38.909% · raw 38.909 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index
Vals Legal Index v1 · Vals AI73.889%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

73.889% · raw 73.889 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_index
Vals Legal Index v1 · Cost per task · Vals AI$0.555946/taskunknown effort
The recorded result & source

$0.555946/task · raw 0.555946 USD/task

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_index
Vals Legal Index v1 · Task latency · Vals AI813.380 sunknown effort
The recorded result & source

813.380 s · raw 813.38 s

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_index
Vals Legal Index v1 · Business & Commercial · Vals AI70.622%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

70.622% · raw 70.622 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_index
Vals Legal Index v1 · Civil Negligence · Vals AI73.546%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

73.546% · raw 73.546 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_index
Vals Legal Index v1 · Other Civil · Vals AI74.604%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

74.604% · raw 74.604 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_index
Vals Legal Index v1 · Real Estate · Vals AI94.752%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

94.752% · raw 94.752 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_index
Vals Legal Index v1 · Labor & Employment · Vals AI92.509%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

92.509% · raw 92.509 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_index
Vals Legal Index v1 · Wills, Estates & Trusts · Vals AI96.183%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

96.183% · raw 96.183 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_index
Vals Legal Index v1 · Family · Vals AI22.727%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

22.727% · raw 22.727 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_index
Vals Legal Index v1 · Criminal · Vals AI53.943%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

53.943% · raw 53.943 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_index
Vals Legal Index v1 · Tax Agent · Vals AI65.752%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

65.752% · raw 65.752 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_index
Vals Legal Index v1 · Legal Research · Vals AI46.635%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

46.635% · raw 46.635 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_index
Vals Legal Index v1 · HLAB Criteria Pass · Vals AI93.717%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

93.717% · raw 93.717 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_index
Legal Research Bench · Vals AI46.635%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

46.635% · raw 46.635 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research
Legal Research Bench · Cost per task · Vals AI$0.288586/taskunknown effort
The recorded result & source

$0.288586/task · raw 0.288586 USD/task

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research
Legal Research Bench · Task latency · Vals AI735.191 sunknown effort
The recorded result & source

735.191 s · raw 735.191 s

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research
Legal Research Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Administrative / Regulatory · Vals AI60.606%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

60.606% · raw 60.606 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research
Legal Research Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Business & Commercial · Vals AI46.512%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

46.512% · raw 46.512 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research
Legal Research Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Civil Litigation · Vals AI51.852%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

51.852% · raw 51.852 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research
Legal Research Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Constitutional / Civil Rights · Vals AI39.474%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

39.474% · raw 39.474 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research
Legal Research Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Criminal · Vals AI36.842%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

36.842% · raw 36.842 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research
Legal Research Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Family · Vals AI22.727%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

22.727% · raw 22.727 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research
Legal Research Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Health · Vals AI70.000%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

70.000% · raw 70 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research
Legal Research Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Immigration · Vals AI27.273%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

27.273% · raw 27.273 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research
Legal Research Bench · Weighted Pass (citation-adjusted) · Vals AI87.872%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

87.872% · raw 87.872 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research
Legal Research Bench · Weighted Pass (citation-adjusted) · Administrative / Regulatory · Vals AI92.674%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

92.674% · raw 92.674 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research
Legal Research Bench · Weighted Pass (citation-adjusted) · Business & Commercial · Vals AI91.526%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

91.526% · raw 91.526 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research
Legal Research Bench · Weighted Pass (citation-adjusted) · Civil Litigation · Vals AI88.404%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

88.404% · raw 88.404 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research
Legal Research Bench · Weighted Pass (citation-adjusted) · Constitutional / Civil Rights · Vals AI88.662%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

88.662% · raw 88.662 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research
Legal Research Bench · Weighted Pass (citation-adjusted) · Criminal · Vals AI84.532%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

84.532% · raw 84.532 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research
Legal Research Bench · Weighted Pass (citation-adjusted) · Family · Vals AI79.482%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

79.482% · raw 79.482 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research
Legal Research Bench · Weighted Pass (citation-adjusted) · Health · Vals AI95.589%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

95.589% · raw 95.589 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research
Legal Research Bench · Weighted Pass (citation-adjusted) · Immigration · Vals AI81.821%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

81.821% · raw 81.821 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research
Tax Agent Bench Accuracy (all-pass, citation-adjusted) · Vals AI38.909%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

38.909% · raw 38.909 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Tax Agent Bench · Cost per task · Vals AI$0.144342/taskunknown effort
The recorded result & source

$0.144342/task · raw 0.144342 USD/task

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Tax Agent Bench · Task latency · Vals AI414.041 sunknown effort
The recorded result & source

414.041 s · raw 414.041 s

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Tax Agent Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Fact-Pattern Analysis · Vals AI41.860%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

41.860% · raw 41.86 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Tax Agent Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Rule & Source Lookup · Vals AI52.478%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

52.478% · raw 52.478 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Tax Agent Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Current & Temporal Analysis · Vals AI46.947%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

46.947% · raw 46.947 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Tax Agent Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Numbers & Calculations · Vals AI50.222%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

50.222% · raw 50.222 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Tax Agent Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Forms & Filings · Vals AI22.667%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

22.667% · raw 22.667 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Tax Agent Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Controversy & Precedence Analysis · Vals AI18.000%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

18.000% · raw 18 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Tax Agent Bench Weighted Pass (citation-adjusted) · Vals AI65.752%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

65.752% · raw 65.752 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Tax Agent Bench · Weighted Pass · Fact-Pattern Analysis · Vals AI61.101%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

61.101% · raw 61.101 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Tax Agent Bench · Weighted Pass · Rule & Source Lookup · Vals AI68.164%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

68.164% · raw 68.164 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Tax Agent Bench · Weighted Pass · Current & Temporal Analysis · Vals AI72.395%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

72.395% · raw 72.395 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Tax Agent Bench · Weighted Pass · Numbers & Calculations · Vals AI73.880%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

73.880% · raw 73.88 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Tax Agent Bench · Weighted Pass · Forms & Filings · Vals AI63.331%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

63.331% · raw 63.331 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Tax Agent Bench · Weighted Pass · Controversy & Precedence Analysis · Vals AI57.658%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

57.658% · raw 57.658 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Vals AI12.626%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

12.626% · raw 12.626 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-10

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/terminal-bench-4
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Cost per task · Vals AI$8.218043/taskunknown effort
The recorded result & source

$8.218043/task · raw 8.218043 USD/task

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-10

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/terminal-bench-4
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Task latency · Vals AI6062.689 sunknown effort
The recorded result & source

6062.689 s · raw 6062.689 s

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-10

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/terminal-bench-4
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Software · Vals AI18.519%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

18.519% · raw 18.519 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/terminal-bench-4
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Science · Vals AI16.667%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

16.667% · raw 16.667 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/terminal-bench-4
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · ML · Vals AI21.212%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

21.212% · raw 21.212 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/terminal-bench-4
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Operations · Vals AI3.704%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

3.704% · raw 3.704 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/terminal-bench-4
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Hardware · Vals AI0.000%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

0.000% · raw 0 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/terminal-bench-4
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Security · Vals AI0.000%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

0.000% · raw 0 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/terminal-bench-4
Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Media · Vals AI0.000%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

0.000% · raw 0 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/terminal-bench-4
Vibe Code Bench v1.1 · Vals AI81.546%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

81.546% · raw 81.546 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: OpenHands. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vibe-code
Vibe Code Bench v1.1 cost per task · Vals AI$1.901278/taskunknown effort
The recorded result & source

$1.901278/task · raw 1.901278 USD/task

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: OpenHands. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vibe-code
Vibe Code Bench v1.1 · Task latency · Vals AI1537.412 sunknown effort
The recorded result & source

1537.412 s · raw 1537.412 s

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-07

Harness: OpenHands. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking.

https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vibe-code
Humanity's Sixth Sense (HSS) · Humanity's Sixth Sense (Scale Labs / Elorian)33.3%unknown effort
The recorded result & source

33.3% · raw 33.3 %

Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator

Source/record date: 2026-11-09

Scale Labs / Elorian primary live HSS board, frozen 522-task suite (288 images, 234 silent videos). Main pass@1 averages three attempts and requires all rubric criteria. Board label "Inkling Small 2", company Thinking Machines, rank 11, no effort label (version empty), so effort is unknown; ±4.20 is the board's confidence half-width. Mapped to Thinking Machines' Inkling 2 Small, the only second-generation Small checkpoint. Exact inference endpoint, output ceiling and frame configuration are not published. Entry createdAt 2026-11-09T00:51:46Z is source metadata, not proof of evaluation date. Public-media contamination and judge dependence apply.

https://labs.scale.com/leaderboard/hss

Read how we select and source scores or the comparison guide.