Inkling 2 Small
Explore Inkling 2 Small from Thinking Machines: published specifications, source-linked vendor benchmarks, independent evaluator coverage and recorded pricing when available.
Compare Inkling 2 Small with other models →Compare subscription plansExplore data coverage
Pricing · OpenRouter
No OpenRouter pricing is recorded for this model. Missing rates are not free.
Official / vendor benchmarks
Default headline records. Own-vendor, peer-vendor and third-party provenance remain visible in evidence; configurations may differ.
| Benchmark / evaluator | Headline score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index v5.0 (vendor-cited) | 30.6xhigh effort | The recorded result & source30.6 · raw 30.6 index Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “AA Index (v5.0)”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “30.6”. Thinking Machines states it uses Artificial Analysis’s reported score for this benchmark, for its own and other models; not an Artificial Analysis record captured by Examenos. Index value, not a percentage. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| Vals Index (vendor reports) | 56.1%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source56.1% · raw 56.1 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “Vals Index (v2.2)”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “56.1%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Vals AI’s reported score for this benchmark; Vals’ own rows are stored separately under the Vals evaluator. Vals Index v2.2. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| FrontierCode 2.0 | 25.4%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source25.4% · raw 25.4 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “FrontierCode v2.0”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “25.4%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Artificial Analysis’s reported score for this benchmark, for its own and other models; not an Artificial Analysis record captured by Examenos. Artificial Analysis’s run of Cognition’s FrontierCode 2.0; Cognition’s own board has no Inkling 2 Small entry at the check. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| DeepSWE v1.1 | 72.1%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source72.1% · raw 72.1 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “DeepSWE v1.1”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “72.1%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Datacurve’s reported score. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 (AA, vendor-cited) | 5.7%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source5.7% · raw 5.7 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “Terminal Bench Science v0.1”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “5.7%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Artificial Analysis’s reported score for this benchmark, for its own and other models; not an Artificial Analysis record captured by Examenos. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| Vibe Code Bench (version unspecified, vendor reports) | 81.6%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source81.6% · raw 81.6 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “Vibe Code Bench v1.1”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “81.6%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Vals AI’s reported score for this benchmark; Vals’ own rows are stored separately under the Vals evaluator. Version 1.1. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| SWE-bench Pro v2-Hard | 86.3%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source86.3% · raw 86.3 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “SWEBench Pro v2 (Hard)”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “86.3%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Scale AI’s reported score for this benchmark. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| BioMysteryBench | 70%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source70% · raw 70 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “BioMysteryBench”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “70.0%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Vals AI’s reported score for this benchmark; Vals’ own rows are stored separately under the Vals evaluator. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| MCP Atlas | 85.4%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source85.4% · raw 85.4 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “MCP AtlasFull / Public”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “85.4/85.0%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Scale AI’s reported score for this benchmark. Full set (first value of “Full / Public”). Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| MCP Atlas (public split, Scale-cited) | 85%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source85% · raw 85 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “MCP AtlasFull / Public”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “85.4/85.0%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Scale AI’s reported score for this benchmark. Public split (second value of “Full / Public”). Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| AA-Briefcase v1.1 (vendor reports) | 1527xhigh effort | The recorded result & source1527 · raw 1527 Elo Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “AA-Briefcase v1.1”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “1527”. Thinking Machines states it uses Artificial Analysis’s reported score for this benchmark, for its own and other models; not an Artificial Analysis record captured by Examenos. Elo-style rating. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| GDPval-AA v2.1 (vendor reports) | 1630xhigh effort | The recorded result & source1630 · raw 1630 Elo Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “GDPVal-AA v2.1”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “1630”. Thinking Machines states it uses Artificial Analysis’s reported score for this benchmark, for its own and other models; not an Artificial Analysis record captured by Examenos. Elo-style rating. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| JobBench | 70.5%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source70.5% · raw 70.5 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “JobBench”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “70.5%”. Harness unpublished. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| τ³-bench Banking | 40.4%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source40.4% · raw 40.4 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “Tau 3 Banking v1.0.1”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “40.4%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Artificial Analysis’s reported score for this benchmark, for its own and other models; not an Artificial Analysis record captured by Examenos. τ³-bench Banking v1.0.1. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| Harvey Legal Agent (Vals harness, vendor reports) | 21.7%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source21.7% · raw 21.7 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “Harvey LAB v1.1”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “21.7%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Vals AI’s reported score for this benchmark; Vals’ own rows are stored separately under the Vals evaluator. The post names Vals’ HLAB-Vals-1.1 as the source. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| Legal Research Bench | 46.6%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source46.6% · raw 46.6 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “Legal Research Bench”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “46.6%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Vals AI’s reported score for this benchmark; Vals’ own rows are stored separately under the Vals evaluator. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| PerceptionBench | 64.7%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source64.7% · raw 64.7 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “PerceptionBench”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “64.7%”. Harness unpublished. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| ScreenSpot-Pro | 83.8%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source83.8% · raw 83.8 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “ScreenSpot Prooriginal / with Python”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “83.8/91.5%”. Original setting without tools (first value of “original / with Python”). Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| BabyVision | 68.6%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source68.6% · raw 68.6 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “BabyVisionoriginal / with Python”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “68.6/93.7%”. Original setting (first value of “original / with Python”). Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| BabyVision (with tools) | 93.7%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source93.7% · raw 93.7 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “BabyVisionoriginal / with Python”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “68.6/93.7%”. With a Python tool (second value of “original / with Python”). Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| GDP.PDF (vendor reports) | 25.2%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source25.2% · raw 25.2 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “GDP.pdf”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “25.2%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Artificial Analysis’s reported score for this benchmark, for its own and other models; not an Artificial Analysis record captured by Examenos. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| MMMU Pro (no tools) | 81.6%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source81.6% · raw 81.6 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “MMMU Pro (Standard 10)”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “81.6%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Artificial Analysis’s reported score for this benchmark, for its own and other models; not an Artificial Analysis record captured by Examenos. Standard setting with 10 options. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| CharXiv (RQ split) | 85.6%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source85.6% · raw 85.6 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “Charxiv RQoriginal / with Python”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “85.6/87.7%”. No tools (first value of “original / with Python”). Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| CharXiv RQ with Python (Thinking Machines) | 87.7%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source87.7% · raw 87.7 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “Charxiv RQoriginal / with Python”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “85.6/87.7%”. With a Python tool (second value). Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| Chartography | 36.7%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source36.7% · raw 36.7 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “Chartographyoriginal / with Python”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “36.7/80.4%”. No tools (first value of “original / with Python”). Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| Chartography (with tools) | 80.4%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source80.4% · raw 80.4 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “Chartographyoriginal / with Python”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “36.7/80.4%”. With a Python tool (second value). Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| AA-LCR v1.1 | 83.3%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source83.3% · raw 83.3 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “AA-LCR v1.1”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “83.3%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Artificial Analysis’s reported score for this benchmark, for its own and other models; not an Artificial Analysis record captured by Examenos. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| LongBench v2 | 70.6%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source70.6% · raw 70.6 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “LongBench v2”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “70.6%”. Harness unpublished. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| AA-Omniscience Index (vendor-cited) | 16.1xhigh effort | The recorded result & source16.1 · raw 16.1 index Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “AA-Omniscience v1.1score”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “16.1”. Thinking Machines states it uses Artificial Analysis’s reported score for this benchmark, for its own and other models; not an Artificial Analysis record captured by Examenos. Omniscience v1.1 index (−100 to 100), not an accuracy. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| FORTRESS Adversarial (Thinking Machines; higher is better) | 83.8%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source83.8% · raw 83.8 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “FORTRESS (adversarial)”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “83.8%”. Higher is better: the rate of refusing harmful requests. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| FORTRESS Benign (Thinking Machines; higher is better) | 79.7%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source79.7% · raw 79.7 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “FORTRESS (benign)”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “79.7%”. Higher is better: the rate of still answering safe look-alike requests. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| StrongREJECT (Thinking Machines; higher is better) | 97.1%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source97.1% · raw 97.1 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “StrongREJECT (none)”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “97.1%”. Higher is better; “none” jailbreak setting as labelled. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA, vendor-cited) | 13.1%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source13.1% · raw 13.1 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “Terminal Bench v4.0”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “13.1%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Artificial Analysis’s reported score for this benchmark, for its own and other models; not an Artificial Analysis record captured by Examenos. The post attributes Terminal-Bench v4.0 to Artificial Analysis (Vals’ own Terminal-Bench 4.0 run shows 12.626, a different value). Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/model-card/inkling-2-small/ |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 85.1%xhigh effort | All 2 recorded results & sources85.1% · raw 85.1 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “Terminal Bench 2.1Inkling 2 Small: Pi harness”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “85.1%”. Inkling 2 Small run in the Pi harness, as the row label states. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/model-card/inkling-2-small/81.3% · raw 81.3 % Alternative · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “Terminal Bench v2.1 (Terminus)”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “81.3%”. Terminus harness; kept as an alternative to the Pi-harness row, which is the headline. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/model-card/inkling-2-small/ |
| SWE-Marathon v1.1 | 38.8%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source38.8% · raw 38.8 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “SWE-Marathon v1.1”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “38.8%”. Harness unpublished. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/model-card/inkling-2-small/ |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 81.2%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source81.2% · raw 81.2 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “SWEBench Multilingual”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “81.2%”. Harness unpublished. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/model-card/inkling-2-small/ |
| SWE-bench Verified | 82.2%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source82.2% · raw 82.2 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “SWEBench Verified”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “82.2%”. Harness unpublished. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/model-card/inkling-2-small/ |
| BrowseComp | 90.2%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source90.2% · raw 90.2 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “BrowseCompwith context management”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “90.2%”. With context management; harness unpublished. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/model-card/inkling-2-small/ |
| DeepSearchQA | 90.9%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source90.9% · raw 90.9 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “DeepSearchQA”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “90.9%”. Harness unpublished. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/model-card/inkling-2-small/ |
| Humanity's Last Exam (text-only, no tools) | 44.1%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source44.1% · raw 44.1 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “HLE (text only)”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “44.1%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Artificial Analysis’s reported score for this benchmark, for its own and other models; not an Artificial Analysis record captured by Examenos. Text-only. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/model-card/inkling-2-small/ |
| GPQA Diamond | 93%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source93% · raw 93 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “GPQA Diamond”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “93.0%”. Sampling and repeats unpublished. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/model-card/inkling-2-small/ |
| HMMT February 2026 | 95.8%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source95.8% · raw 95.8 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “HMMT Feb 2026”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “95.8%”. Sampling and repeats unpublished. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/model-card/inkling-2-small/ |
| MathVision | 92.8%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source92.8% · raw 92.8 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “MathVision”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “92.8%”. Split unpublished. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/model-card/inkling-2-small/ |
| AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination | 73.3%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source73.3% · raw 73.3 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (post and model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “AA-Omniscience v1.1non-hallucination rate”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “73.3%”. Thinking Machines states it uses Artificial Analysis’s reported score for this benchmark, for its own and other models; not an Artificial Analysis record captured by Examenos. Omniscience v1.1 non-hallucination rate (1 − hallucination rate). Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small/ |
| AutomationBench v1.0.6 | 45.6%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source45.6% · raw 45.6 % Headline · xhigh effort · Own vendor Source/record date: 2026-11-05 Thinking Machines’ Introducing Inkling 2 Small (model card, 5 November 2026), benchmark table, row “AutomationBench v1.0.6”, column “Inkling 2 Small”, value “45.6%”. Version 1.0.6 as labelled; harness unpublished. Thinking Machines runs its evaluations at effort 0.99, which the post labels “xhigh”, temperature 1.0 and a 1M-token maximum trajectory (256K for Inkling-Small); stored as xhigh because the vendor names it so. Execution date unpublished; the table calls itself an evaluation snapshot. https://thinkingmachines.ai/model-card/inkling-2-small/ |
Independent evaluators
Evaluator harnesses are distinct from vendor measurements. Missing coverage is not a failed test.
| Benchmark / evaluator | Headline score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1 · ARC Prize | 96.5%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source96.5% · raw 96.5 % Headline · xhigh effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: Verified Semi-Private. Exact ARC-AGI-1 Semi-Private source configuration thinky-inkling-2-small-xhigh (“Inkling 2 Small (XHigh)”). Raw source fraction ×100; source artifact generation is not an execution date. ARC Prize lists one configuration, labelled XHigh. Published cost is workload evidence, not token tariff. https://arcprize.org/results/thinky-inkling-2-small |
| ARC-AGI-2 · ARC Prize | 81.7%xhigh effort | The recorded result & source81.7% · raw 81.6667 % Headline · xhigh effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: Verified Semi-Private. Exact ARC-AGI-2 Semi-Private source configuration thinky-inkling-2-small-xhigh (“Inkling 2 Small (XHigh)”). Raw source fraction ×100; source artifact generation is not an execution date. ARC Prize lists one configuration, labelled XHigh. Published cost is workload evidence, not token tariff. https://arcprize.org/results/thinky-inkling-2-small |
| Intelligence Index v5.0.1 · Artificial Analysis | 31unknown effort | The recorded result & source31 · raw 31 index Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Manual observation of Artificial Analysis’s public Intelligence Index v5.0.1 evaluation page, “Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: Score” chart, 7 November 2026 (selection inkling-2-small, inkling-small, inkling; research_notes/Model and benchmark news November 7/captures/aa-index-browser.json). Configuration “Inkling 2 Small” (slug inkling-2-small); AA’s label states no reasoning effort. The same reading shows Inkling Small 13 and Inkling (xhigh) 12, equal to the stored rows. AA’s 5 November changelog reports the same 31. AA’s displayed rounding; no API, download, hidden precision or inferred run date. https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/artificial-analysis-intelligence-index |
| MCP Atlas · Task pass rate · MCP Atlas (Scale Labs) | 85.4%unknown effort | The recorded result & source85.4% · raw 85.4 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: Scale MCP Atlas updated April 2026 method, maximum 100 tool calls/task, transient-error retry, updated LLM judge. Exact visible “Inkling Small 2” pass rate 85.40%, 95% interval half-width 2.20 percentage points, marked NEW, rank 9. The board label “Inkling Small 2” is Inkling 2 Small: Thinking Machines’ 5 November post cites Scale’s MCP Atlas full-set value 85.4 for Inkling 2 Small. No effort label shown. Footer update date does not establish execution date. https://labs.scale.com/leaderboard/mcp_atlas |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Vals AI | 69.504%unknown effort | The recorded result & source69.504% · raw 69.504 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Cost per task · Vals AI | $0.529753/taskunknown effort | The recorded result & source$0.529753/task · raw 0.529753 USD/task Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Task latency · Vals AI | 833.925 sunknown effort | The recorded result & source833.925 s · raw 833.925 s Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Template · Vals AI | 71.595%unknown effort | The recorded result & source71.595% · raw 71.595 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Scratch · Vals AI | 67.086%unknown effort | The recorded result & source67.086% · raw 67.086 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · LBO · Vals AI | 55.861%unknown effort | The recorded result & source55.861% · raw 55.861 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · DCF · Vals AI | 62.222%unknown effort | The recorded result & source62.222% · raw 62.222 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · M&A · Vals AI | 73.659%unknown effort | The recorded result & source73.659% · raw 73.659 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Operating · Vals AI | 69.976%unknown effort | The recorded result & source69.976% · raw 69.976 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Comps · Vals AI | 73.120%unknown effort | The recorded result & source73.120% · raw 73.12 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Dataroom · Vals AI | 83.423%unknown effort | The recorded result & source83.423% · raw 83.423 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 · Misc · Vals AI | 68.264%unknown effort | The recorded result & source68.264% · raw 68.264 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/emb-v1-1 |
| Vals Finance Index v1 · Vals AI | 61.470%unknown effort | The recorded result & source61.470% · raw 61.47 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/finance_index |
| Vals Finance Index v1 · Cost per task · Vals AI | $0.283293/taskunknown effort | The recorded result & source$0.283293/task · raw 0.283293 USD/task Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/finance_index |
| Vals Finance Index v1 · Task latency · Vals AI | 514.765 sunknown effort | The recorded result & source514.765 s · raw 514.765 s Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/finance_index |
| Vals Finance Index v1 · Finance Agent v2.1 · Vals AI | 67.536%unknown effort | The recorded result & source67.536% · raw 67.536 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/finance_index |
| Vals Finance Index v1 · EMB v1.1 · Vals AI | 69.504%unknown effort | The recorded result & source69.504% · raw 69.504 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/finance_index |
| Vals Finance Index v1 · Tax Agent all-pass accuracy · Vals AI | 38.909%unknown effort | The recorded result & source38.909% · raw 38.909 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/finance_index |
| Finance Agent v2.1 · Vals AI | 67.536%unknown effort | The recorded result & source67.536% · raw 67.536 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1 |
| Finance Agent v2.1 · Cost per task · Vals AI | $0.175784/taskunknown effort | The recorded result & source$0.175784/task · raw 0.175784 USD/task Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1 |
| Finance Agent v2.1 · Task latency · Vals AI | 296.329 sunknown effort | The recorded result & source296.329 s · raw 296.329 s Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1 |
| Finance Agent v2.1 · All-Pass Accuracy · Vals AI | 56.585%unknown effort | The recorded result & source56.585% · raw 56.585 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1 |
| Finance Agent v2.1 · General Qualitative Analysis · Vals AI | 78.029%unknown effort | The recorded result & source78.029% · raw 78.029 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1 |
| Finance Agent v2.1 · General Quantitative Analysis · Vals AI | 79.183%unknown effort | The recorded result & source79.183% · raw 79.183 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1 |
| Finance Agent v2.1 · Market Analysis · Vals AI | 58.988%unknown effort | The recorded result & source58.988% · raw 58.988 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1 |
| Finance Agent v2.1 · Comparables · Vals AI | 64.990%unknown effort | The recorded result & source64.990% · raw 64.99 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1 |
| Finance Agent v2.1 · Precedents · Vals AI | 47.091%unknown effort | The recorded result & source47.091% · raw 47.091 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1 |
| Finance Agent v2.1 · Adjustments · Vals AI | 67.402%unknown effort | The recorded result & source67.402% · raw 67.402 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1 |
| Finance Agent v2.1 · Earnings Analysis · Vals AI | 88.936%unknown effort | The recorded result & source88.936% · raw 88.936 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1 |
| Finance Agent v2.1 · Disclosure Analysis · Vals AI | 80.792%unknown effort | The recorded result & source80.792% · raw 80.792 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1 |
| Finance Agent v2.1 · Financial Modeling · Vals AI | 42.417%unknown effort | The recorded result & source42.417% · raw 42.417 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/fabv2-1 |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Vals AI | 21.667%unknown effort | The recorded result & source21.667% · raw 21.667 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Cost per task · Vals AI | $1.234911/taskunknown effort | The recorded result & source$1.234911/task · raw 1.234911 USD/task Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task latency · Vals AI | 1290.908 sunknown effort | The recorded result & source1290.908 s · raw 1290.908 s Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Antitrust Competition · Vals AI | 40.000%unknown effort | The recorded result & source40.000% · raw 40 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Arbitration International Dispute Resolution · Vals AI | 30.000%unknown effort | The recorded result & source30.000% · raw 30 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Banking Finance · Vals AI | 10.000%unknown effort | The recorded result & source10.000% · raw 10 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Bankruptcy Restructuring · Vals AI | 20.000%unknown effort | The recorded result & source20.000% · raw 20 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Capital Markets · Vals AI | 20.000%unknown effort | The recorded result & source20.000% · raw 20 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Corporate Governance · Vals AI | 30.000%unknown effort | The recorded result & source30.000% · raw 30 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Corporate Ma · Vals AI | 20.000%unknown effort | The recorded result & source20.000% · raw 20 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Data Privacy Cybersecurity · Vals AI | 20.000%unknown effort | The recorded result & source20.000% · raw 20 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Emerging Companies Venture Capital · Vals AI | 20.000%unknown effort | The recorded result & source20.000% · raw 20 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Employment Labor · Vals AI | 0.000%unknown effort | The recorded result & source0.000% · raw 0 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Energy Natural Resources · Vals AI | 50.000%unknown effort | The recorded result & source50.000% · raw 50 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Environmental Esg · Vals AI | 0.000%unknown effort | The recorded result & source0.000% · raw 0 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Funds Asset Management · Vals AI | 30.000%unknown effort | The recorded result & source30.000% · raw 30 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Healthcare Life Sciences · Vals AI | 30.000%unknown effort | The recorded result & source30.000% · raw 30 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Immigration · Vals AI | 30.000%unknown effort | The recorded result & source30.000% · raw 30 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Insurance · Vals AI | 0.000%unknown effort | The recorded result & source0.000% · raw 0 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Intellectual Property · Vals AI | 20.000%unknown effort | The recorded result & source20.000% · raw 20 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · International Trade Sanctions · Vals AI | 20.000%unknown effort | The recorded result & source20.000% · raw 20 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Litigation Dispute Resolution · Vals AI | 40.000%unknown effort | The recorded result & source40.000% · raw 40 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Real Estate · Vals AI | 30.000%unknown effort | The recorded result & source30.000% · raw 30 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Structured Finance Securitization · Vals AI | 20.000%unknown effort | The recorded result & source20.000% · raw 20 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Tax · Vals AI | 20.000%unknown effort | The recorded result & source20.000% · raw 20 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · Trusts Estates Private Client · Vals AI | 20.000%unknown effort | The recorded result & source20.000% · raw 20 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Task Pass Rate · White Collar Defense Investigations · Vals AI | 0.000%unknown effort | The recorded result & source0.000% · raw 0 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Vals AI | 93.717%unknown effort | The recorded result & source93.717% · raw 93.717 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Antitrust Competition · Vals AI | 95.471%unknown effort | The recorded result & source95.471% · raw 95.471 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Arbitration International Dispute Resolution · Vals AI | 94.803%unknown effort | The recorded result & source94.803% · raw 94.803 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Banking Finance · Vals AI | 95.522%unknown effort | The recorded result & source95.522% · raw 95.522 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Bankruptcy Restructuring · Vals AI | 92.215%unknown effort | The recorded result & source92.215% · raw 92.215 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Capital Markets · Vals AI | 94.706%unknown effort | The recorded result & source94.706% · raw 94.706 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Corporate Governance · Vals AI | 96.404%unknown effort | The recorded result & source96.404% · raw 96.404 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Corporate Ma · Vals AI | 96.463%unknown effort | The recorded result & source96.463% · raw 96.463 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Data Privacy Cybersecurity · Vals AI | 96.820%unknown effort | The recorded result & source96.820% · raw 96.82 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Emerging Companies Venture Capital · Vals AI | 96.587%unknown effort | The recorded result & source96.587% · raw 96.587 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Employment Labor · Vals AI | 92.509%unknown effort | The recorded result & source92.509% · raw 92.509 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Energy Natural Resources · Vals AI | 98.185%unknown effort | The recorded result & source98.185% · raw 98.185 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Environmental Esg · Vals AI | 92.652%unknown effort | The recorded result & source92.652% · raw 92.652 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Funds Asset Management · Vals AI | 93.003%unknown effort | The recorded result & source93.003% · raw 93.003 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Healthcare Life Sciences · Vals AI | 94.799%unknown effort | The recorded result & source94.799% · raw 94.799 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Immigration · Vals AI | 92.364%unknown effort | The recorded result & source92.364% · raw 92.364 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Insurance · Vals AI | 91.176%unknown effort | The recorded result & source91.176% · raw 91.176 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Intellectual Property · Vals AI | 96.619%unknown effort | The recorded result & source96.619% · raw 96.619 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · International Trade Sanctions · Vals AI | 95.618%unknown effort | The recorded result & source95.618% · raw 95.618 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Litigation Dispute Resolution · Vals AI | 95.677%unknown effort | The recorded result & source95.677% · raw 95.677 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Real Estate · Vals AI | 94.752%unknown effort | The recorded result & source94.752% · raw 94.752 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Structured Finance Securitization · Vals AI | 93.387%unknown effort | The recorded result & source93.387% · raw 93.387 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Tax · Vals AI | 93.144%unknown effort | The recorded result & source93.144% · raw 93.144 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · Trusts Estates Private Client · Vals AI | 96.183%unknown effort | The recorded result & source96.183% · raw 96.183 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| HLAB v1.1 (Vals) · Criteria Pass Rate · White Collar Defense Investigations · Vals AI | 71.044%unknown effort | The recorded result & source71.044% · raw 71.044 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab |
| Vals Index v2.2 · Vals AI | 56.081%unknown effort | The recorded result & source56.081% · raw 56.081 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index |
| Vals Index v2.2 · Cost per task · Vals AI | $3.509318/taskunknown effort | The recorded result & source$3.509318/task · raw 3.509318 USD/task Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index |
| Vals Index v2.2 · Task latency · Vals AI | 3034.529 sunknown effort | The recorded result & source3034.529 s · raw 3034.529 s Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index |
| Vals Index v2.2 · Vibe Code Bench v1.1 · Vals AI | 81.546%unknown effort | The recorded result & source81.546% · raw 81.546 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: OpenHands. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index |
| Vals Index v2.2 · Finance Agent v2.1 · Vals AI | 67.536%unknown effort | The recorded result & source67.536% · raw 67.536 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index |
| Vals Index v2.2 · EMB v1.1 · Vals AI | 69.504%unknown effort | The recorded result & source69.504% · raw 69.504 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index |
| Vals Index v2.2 · Code Migration v1.1 (index subset 50 CLI + 10 COBOL) · Vals AI | 39.457%unknown effort | The recorded result & source39.457% · raw 39.457 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Index Code Migration is the 60-task subset (50 CLI + 10 COBOL), not standalone Migration. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index |
| Vals Index v2.2 · Legal Research · Vals AI | 46.635%unknown effort | The recorded result & source46.635% · raw 46.635 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index |
| Vals Index v2.2 · HLAB v1.1 · Vals AI | 21.667%unknown effort | The recorded result & source21.667% · raw 21.667 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index |
| Vals Index v2.2 · Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Vals AI | 12.626%unknown effort | The recorded result & source12.626% · raw 12.626 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-10 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index |
| Vals Index v2.2 · Tax Agent · Vals AI | 38.909%unknown effort | The recorded result & source38.909% · raw 38.909 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index |
| Vals Legal Index v1 · Vals AI | 73.889%unknown effort | The recorded result & source73.889% · raw 73.889 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_index |
| Vals Legal Index v1 · Cost per task · Vals AI | $0.555946/taskunknown effort | The recorded result & source$0.555946/task · raw 0.555946 USD/task Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_index |
| Vals Legal Index v1 · Task latency · Vals AI | 813.380 sunknown effort | The recorded result & source813.380 s · raw 813.38 s Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_index |
| Vals Legal Index v1 · Business & Commercial · Vals AI | 70.622%unknown effort | The recorded result & source70.622% · raw 70.622 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_index |
| Vals Legal Index v1 · Civil Negligence · Vals AI | 73.546%unknown effort | The recorded result & source73.546% · raw 73.546 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_index |
| Vals Legal Index v1 · Other Civil · Vals AI | 74.604%unknown effort | The recorded result & source74.604% · raw 74.604 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_index |
| Vals Legal Index v1 · Real Estate · Vals AI | 94.752%unknown effort | The recorded result & source94.752% · raw 94.752 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_index |
| Vals Legal Index v1 · Labor & Employment · Vals AI | 92.509%unknown effort | The recorded result & source92.509% · raw 92.509 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_index |
| Vals Legal Index v1 · Wills, Estates & Trusts · Vals AI | 96.183%unknown effort | The recorded result & source96.183% · raw 96.183 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_index |
| Vals Legal Index v1 · Family · Vals AI | 22.727%unknown effort | The recorded result & source22.727% · raw 22.727 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_index |
| Vals Legal Index v1 · Criminal · Vals AI | 53.943%unknown effort | The recorded result & source53.943% · raw 53.943 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_index |
| Vals Legal Index v1 · Tax Agent · Vals AI | 65.752%unknown effort | The recorded result & source65.752% · raw 65.752 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_index |
| Vals Legal Index v1 · Legal Research · Vals AI | 46.635%unknown effort | The recorded result & source46.635% · raw 46.635 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_index |
| Vals Legal Index v1 · HLAB Criteria Pass · Vals AI | 93.717%unknown effort | The recorded result & source93.717% · raw 93.717 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_index |
| Legal Research Bench · Vals AI | 46.635%unknown effort | The recorded result & source46.635% · raw 46.635 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research |
| Legal Research Bench · Cost per task · Vals AI | $0.288586/taskunknown effort | The recorded result & source$0.288586/task · raw 0.288586 USD/task Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research |
| Legal Research Bench · Task latency · Vals AI | 735.191 sunknown effort | The recorded result & source735.191 s · raw 735.191 s Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research |
| Legal Research Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Administrative / Regulatory · Vals AI | 60.606%unknown effort | The recorded result & source60.606% · raw 60.606 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research |
| Legal Research Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Business & Commercial · Vals AI | 46.512%unknown effort | The recorded result & source46.512% · raw 46.512 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research |
| Legal Research Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Civil Litigation · Vals AI | 51.852%unknown effort | The recorded result & source51.852% · raw 51.852 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research |
| Legal Research Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Constitutional / Civil Rights · Vals AI | 39.474%unknown effort | The recorded result & source39.474% · raw 39.474 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research |
| Legal Research Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Criminal · Vals AI | 36.842%unknown effort | The recorded result & source36.842% · raw 36.842 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research |
| Legal Research Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Family · Vals AI | 22.727%unknown effort | The recorded result & source22.727% · raw 22.727 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research |
| Legal Research Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Health · Vals AI | 70.000%unknown effort | The recorded result & source70.000% · raw 70 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research |
| Legal Research Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Immigration · Vals AI | 27.273%unknown effort | The recorded result & source27.273% · raw 27.273 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research |
| Legal Research Bench · Weighted Pass (citation-adjusted) · Vals AI | 87.872%unknown effort | The recorded result & source87.872% · raw 87.872 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research |
| Legal Research Bench · Weighted Pass (citation-adjusted) · Administrative / Regulatory · Vals AI | 92.674%unknown effort | The recorded result & source92.674% · raw 92.674 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research |
| Legal Research Bench · Weighted Pass (citation-adjusted) · Business & Commercial · Vals AI | 91.526%unknown effort | The recorded result & source91.526% · raw 91.526 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research |
| Legal Research Bench · Weighted Pass (citation-adjusted) · Civil Litigation · Vals AI | 88.404%unknown effort | The recorded result & source88.404% · raw 88.404 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research |
| Legal Research Bench · Weighted Pass (citation-adjusted) · Constitutional / Civil Rights · Vals AI | 88.662%unknown effort | The recorded result & source88.662% · raw 88.662 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research |
| Legal Research Bench · Weighted Pass (citation-adjusted) · Criminal · Vals AI | 84.532%unknown effort | The recorded result & source84.532% · raw 84.532 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research |
| Legal Research Bench · Weighted Pass (citation-adjusted) · Family · Vals AI | 79.482%unknown effort | The recorded result & source79.482% · raw 79.482 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research |
| Legal Research Bench · Weighted Pass (citation-adjusted) · Health · Vals AI | 95.589%unknown effort | The recorded result & source95.589% · raw 95.589 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research |
| Legal Research Bench · Weighted Pass (citation-adjusted) · Immigration · Vals AI | 81.821%unknown effort | The recorded result & source81.821% · raw 81.821 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_research |
| Tax Agent Bench Accuracy (all-pass, citation-adjusted) · Vals AI | 38.909%unknown effort | The recorded result & source38.909% · raw 38.909 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench |
| Tax Agent Bench · Cost per task · Vals AI | $0.144342/taskunknown effort | The recorded result & source$0.144342/task · raw 0.144342 USD/task Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench |
| Tax Agent Bench · Task latency · Vals AI | 414.041 sunknown effort | The recorded result & source414.041 s · raw 414.041 s Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench |
| Tax Agent Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Fact-Pattern Analysis · Vals AI | 41.860%unknown effort | The recorded result & source41.860% · raw 41.86 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench |
| Tax Agent Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Rule & Source Lookup · Vals AI | 52.478%unknown effort | The recorded result & source52.478% · raw 52.478 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench |
| Tax Agent Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Current & Temporal Analysis · Vals AI | 46.947%unknown effort | The recorded result & source46.947% · raw 46.947 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench |
| Tax Agent Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Numbers & Calculations · Vals AI | 50.222%unknown effort | The recorded result & source50.222% · raw 50.222 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench |
| Tax Agent Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Forms & Filings · Vals AI | 22.667%unknown effort | The recorded result & source22.667% · raw 22.667 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench |
| Tax Agent Bench · All-Pass Accuracy · Controversy & Precedence Analysis · Vals AI | 18.000%unknown effort | The recorded result & source18.000% · raw 18 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench |
| Tax Agent Bench Weighted Pass (citation-adjusted) · Vals AI | 65.752%unknown effort | The recorded result & source65.752% · raw 65.752 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench |
| Tax Agent Bench · Weighted Pass · Fact-Pattern Analysis · Vals AI | 61.101%unknown effort | The recorded result & source61.101% · raw 61.101 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench |
| Tax Agent Bench · Weighted Pass · Rule & Source Lookup · Vals AI | 68.164%unknown effort | The recorded result & source68.164% · raw 68.164 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench |
| Tax Agent Bench · Weighted Pass · Current & Temporal Analysis · Vals AI | 72.395%unknown effort | The recorded result & source72.395% · raw 72.395 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench |
| Tax Agent Bench · Weighted Pass · Numbers & Calculations · Vals AI | 73.880%unknown effort | The recorded result & source73.880% · raw 73.88 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench |
| Tax Agent Bench · Weighted Pass · Forms & Filings · Vals AI | 63.331%unknown effort | The recorded result & source63.331% · raw 63.331 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench |
| Tax Agent Bench · Weighted Pass · Controversy & Precedence Analysis · Vals AI | 57.658%unknown effort | The recorded result & source57.658% · raw 57.658 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/tax_agent_bench |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Vals AI | 12.626%unknown effort | The recorded result & source12.626% · raw 12.626 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-10 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/terminal-bench-4 |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Cost per task · Vals AI | $8.218043/taskunknown effort | The recorded result & source$8.218043/task · raw 8.218043 USD/task Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-10 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/terminal-bench-4 |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Task latency · Vals AI | 6062.689 sunknown effort | The recorded result & source6062.689 s · raw 6062.689 s Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-10 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/terminal-bench-4 |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Software · Vals AI | 18.519%unknown effort | The recorded result & source18.519% · raw 18.519 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/terminal-bench-4 |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Science · Vals AI | 16.667%unknown effort | The recorded result & source16.667% · raw 16.667 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/terminal-bench-4 |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 · ML · Vals AI | 21.212%unknown effort | The recorded result & source21.212% · raw 21.212 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/terminal-bench-4 |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Operations · Vals AI | 3.704%unknown effort | The recorded result & source3.704% · raw 3.704 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/terminal-bench-4 |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Hardware · Vals AI | 0.000%unknown effort | The recorded result & source0.000% · raw 0 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/terminal-bench-4 |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Security · Vals AI | 0.000%unknown effort | The recorded result & source0.000% · raw 0 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/terminal-bench-4 |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Media · Vals AI | 0.000%unknown effort | The recorded result & source0.000% · raw 0 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: published Vals component protocol. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/terminal-bench-4 |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 · Vals AI | 81.546%unknown effort | The recorded result & source81.546% · raw 81.546 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: OpenHands. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vibe-code |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 cost per task · Vals AI | $1.901278/taskunknown effort | The recorded result & source$1.901278/task · raw 1.901278 USD/task Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: OpenHands. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vibe-code |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 · Task latency · Vals AI | 1537.412 sunknown effort | The recorded result & source1537.412 s · raw 1537.412 s Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-07 Harness: OpenHands. Exact Vals task/version and source model. Requested effort, provider and diagnostics are retained with this observation; evaluation date and checkpoint hash are unpublished. Source update date is not execution date. Quality standard error is not a confidence interval. A source revision does not by itself establish a model update. Workload diagnostic; quality uncertainty does not describe its uncertainty. Not a token tariff or controlled efficiency ranking. https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vibe-code |
| Humanity's Sixth Sense (HSS) · Humanity's Sixth Sense (Scale Labs / Elorian) | 33.3%unknown effort | The recorded result & source33.3% · raw 33.3 % Headline · unknown effort · Independent evaluator Source/record date: 2026-11-09 Scale Labs / Elorian primary live HSS board, frozen 522-task suite (288 images, 234 silent videos). Main pass@1 averages three attempts and requires all rubric criteria. Board label "Inkling Small 2", company Thinking Machines, rank 11, no effort label (version empty), so effort is unknown; ±4.20 is the board's confidence half-width. Mapped to Thinking Machines' Inkling 2 Small, the only second-generation Small checkpoint. Exact inference endpoint, output ceiling and frame configuration are not published. Entry createdAt 2026-11-09T00:51:46Z is source metadata, not proof of evaluation date. Public-media contamination and judge dependence apply. https://labs.scale.com/leaderboard/hss |
Read how we select and source scores or the comparison guide.